IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i21-22p3430-3441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh
  • Catherine McCabe
  • Sheila Payne

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of action learning for improving cancer related pain management in the acute healthcare settings. Background Despite the prevalent use of action learning in private, public, clinical and non‐clinical settings, no studies were found in the literature that either examined cancer pain management or used action learning as an approach to improve patient care in acute healthcare settings. Methods An intervention pre – posttest design was adopted using an action learning programme (ALPs) as the intervention. Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practice were assessed and evaluated before and after the implementation of the six‐month ALPs. A pre and post audit and survey were conducted for data collection. The data were collected from the entire population of 170 healthcare professionals in one healthcare organisation. Results The management of cancer related pain improved significantly following the intervention. Significant improvement were also seen in healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes with improved cancer related pain management as a consequence of this. Conclusion Despite many organisational challenges to practice development and collaborative working in healthcare settings there is evidence that action learning can achieve positive outcomes for improving CRP and supporting collaborative working. Relevance to clinical practice Action learning needs to be considered as a strategy for achieving high quality standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Ali Mohammed Kasasbeh & Catherine McCabe & Sheila Payne, 2017. "Action learning: an effective way to improve cancer‐related pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3430-3441, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3430-3441
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfhild Dihle & Gunnar Bjølseth & Sølvi Helseth, 2006. "The gap between saying and doing in postoperative pain management," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 469-479, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsten Kaptain & Vibeke Bregnballe & Pia Dreyer, 2017. "Patient participation in postoperative pain assessment after spine surgery in a recovery unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2986-2994, October.
    2. Joanne Harmon & Peter Summons & Isabel Higgins, 2019. "Experiences of the older hospitalised person on nursing pain care: An ethnographic insight," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4447-4459, December.
    3. Anna‐Clara Rullander & Mats Lundström & Marie Lindkvist & Bruno Hägglöf & Viveca Lindh, 2016. "Stress symptoms among adolescents before and after scoliosis surgery: correlations with postoperative pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1086-1094, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:21-22:p:3430-3441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.