IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v20y2004i1p81-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delaware farmers' adoption of GE soybeans in a time of uncertain U.S. adoption

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Bernard

    (229 Townsend Hall, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: jbernard@udel.edu)

  • John D. Pesek, Jr.

    (227 Townsend Hall, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: pesek@udel.edu)

  • Chunbo Fan

    (223 Townsend Hall, Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. E-mail: fchunbo@udel.edu)

Abstract

Soybeans genetically engineered to withstand the herbicide Roundup became available to farmers in 1996 and rapidly became the most popular of the new biotechnology crops. However, rising concerns over consumer acceptance late in 1999 created a climate of uncertainty over national markets and put continuing adoption in question. This study models Delaware farmers' adoption patterns and decisions, and examines accompanying changes in their operations at the start of the 2000 season. Model results show adoption to have continued upward in terms of farmers and acreage, with age, soybean income, computer use, and labeling opinion identifying major adopters. Adopters were expanding operations and utilizing accompanying new techniques at a high rate. With much of the state farmers' market assured by the local broiler industry, farmers appeared unconcerned over national market uncertainties. The research thus demonstrates the need to consider local conditions and potential for variations in adoption patterns and adopter characteristics. [EconLit citations: Q160, O330]. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Agribusiness 20: 81-94, 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Bernard & John D. Pesek, Jr. & Chunbo Fan, 2004. "Delaware farmers' adoption of GE soybeans in a time of uncertain U.S. adoption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 81-94.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:20:y:2004:i:1:p:81-94
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.10085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.10085
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.10085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander E. Saak & David A. Hennessy, 2002. "Planting Decisions and Uncertain Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Crop Varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 308-319.
    2. Carlson, Gerald A. & Marra, Michele C. & Hubbell, Bryan J., 1997. "Transgenic Technology for Crop Protection: The New "Super Seeds"," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 12(3), pages 1-6.
    3. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & McBride, William D., 2002. "Adoption Of Bioengineered Crops," Agricultural Economic Reports 33957, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. William D. McBride & Nora Books, 2000. "Survey evidence on producer use and costs of genetically modified seed," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 6-20.
    5. Mary K. Knudson, 1991. "Incorporating Technological Change in Diffusion Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(3), pages 724-733.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard, John C. & Pesek, John D. Jr. & Parish, Amy, 2015. "Potential Farmer Adoption of High Available Phosphorus Corn over a Three-year Period," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 44(3), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Carlberg, Jared G. & Ward, Clement E. & Holcomb, Rodney B., 2006. "Success Factors for New Generation Cooperatives," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20.
    3. Rossi, Fabiana Ribeiro & Filho, Hildo Meirelles de Souza & Miranda, Bruno Varella & Carrer, Marcelo José, 2020. "The role of contracts in the adoption of irrigation by Brazilian orange growers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. repec:ags:afjare:225655 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvie Bonny, 2011. "Herbicide-tolerant Transgenic Soybean over 15 Years of Cultivation: Pesticide Use, Weed Resistance, and Some Economic Issues. The Case of the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Anchal Arora & Sangeeta Bansal, "undated". "Diffusion of Bt Cotton in India: Impact of Seed Prices and Technological Development," Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Discussion Papers 11-01, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
    3. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth James, 2011. "Revisiting the Impact of Bt Corn Adoption by U.S. Farmers," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103327, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth James, 2012. "Fifteen Years Later: Examining the Adoption of Bt Corn Varieties by U.S. Farmers," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124257, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Aultman, Stephen & Hurley, Terrance M. & Mitchell, Paul D. & Frisvold, George B., 2009. "Valuing the Roundup Ready® Soybean Weed Management Program," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49342, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Eric Tollens, 2004. "Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beet: the one euro question," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Qiao, Fangbin, 2015. "Fifteen Years of Bt Cotton in China: The Economic Impact and its Dynamics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 177-185.
    8. Huffman, Wallace E., 1999. "Finance, Organization, and Impacts of U.S. Agricultural Research: Future Prospects," ISU General Staff Papers 199903010800001315, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Michel Fok & Marnus Gouse & Jean-Luc Hofs & Johann Kirsten, 2007. "Contextual appraisal of GM cotton diffusion in South Africa," Post-Print halshs-00176546, HAL.
    10. Fausti, Scott W. & Van der Sluis, Evert & Qasmi, Bashir A. & Lundgren, Jonathan, 2014. "The Effect of Biotechnology and Biofuels on U.S. Corn Belt Cropping Systems: Updated Version," Economics Staff Papers 168202, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Consmuller, Nicola & Beckmann, Volker & Petrick, Martin, 2009. "The Adoption of Bt-Maize - An Econometric Analysis," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51630, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 1999. "The Economics Of Agricultural Biotechnology: Historical And Analytical Framework," Working Papers 31845, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    13. Jonas Kathage & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo, 2016. "Framework for assessing the socio-economic impacts of Bt maize cultivation," JRC Research Reports JRC103197, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Christopher J. Shanahan & Neal H. Hooker & Thomas L. Sporleder, 2008. "The diffusion of organic food products: toward a theory of adoption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 369-387.
    15. Roberts, Roland K. & English, Burton C. & Gao, Qi & Larson, James A., 2006. "Adoption of Conservation-Tillage Methods and Genetically Modified Cotton," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35293, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth J. & Milkove, Daniel, 2016. "The Adoption of Genetically Engineered Alfalfa, Canola and Sugarbeets in the United States," Economic Information Bulletin 262136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Roberts, Roland K. & English, Burton C. & Gao, Qi & Larson, James A., 2006. "Simultaneous Adoption of Herbicide-Resistance and Conservation-Tillage Cotton Technologies," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Dixon, Peter B., 2007. "Evidence-based Trade Policy Decision Making in Australia and the Development of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling," Conference papers 331643, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. D.S. Bullock, 2001. "Who pays the costs of non-GMO segregation and identity preservation ?," Post-Print hal-02283458, HAL.
    20. Huffman, Wallace E., 1999. "New Insights on the Organization of Agricultural Research: Theory and Evidence for Western Developed Countries," ISU General Staff Papers 199907010700001319, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:20:y:2004:i:1:p:81-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.