IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mosaro/v36y2020i2p1-18n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Searching for and Perception of Information by Consumers in the Light of the Sustainable Consumption Idea — On the Example of Food Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Gorynska-Goldmann Elzbieta

    (Poznan University of Life Sciences, Facuty of Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Economics and Economics Policy in Agribusiness, Poland, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637Poznan)

  • Gazdecki Michał

    (Poznan University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Economics and Economics Policy in Agribusiness)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the sources of information about food, the cost of collecting the information and the perception of messages by consumers in the light of the sustainable food consumption idea. We used primary materials from a direct, personal survey which were later analyzed with the use of Berelson’s content analysis method. We found that a consumer shows low interest in sourcing the information about sustainable food consumption. The most credible, from the consumer’s point of view, information about food, consumption and the food market, comes from reports and scientific papers, as well as from the consumers’ families or friends. Gathering information is connected with devoting time which we spend on finding the right content. The information connected to environmental issues was the most distinctive for the respondents; other categories of information concerned the waste of food, shopping planning, the direction of changes, personal health issues and the influence of food products on one’s health, as well as consumption in connection with recommendations concerning health (among others, in the scope of nutrition, recommendations and specialistic advices). The knowledge of the most credible sources of the information about food consumption, the frequency of acquiring such knowledge, the costs of gathering information and the perception of messages should be reflected in properly chosen communication channels for the promotion of sustainable food consumption. In the research over sustainable food consumption we should focus more on our information needs. The network approach and the perspective of active engagement of consumers in the process of creating innovations in food products give us a new approach for the market analysis, popularization of the idea of sustainable food consumption and let us change some deeply rooted habits and behaviors of consumers. As a result of such engagement, consumers will be more willing to cooperate and trust one another, and thanks to the feeling of social effectiveness, they will be more interested in the development of the sustainable food consumption model and food policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Gorynska-Goldmann Elzbieta & Gazdecki Michał, 2020. "Searching for and Perception of Information by Consumers in the Light of the Sustainable Consumption Idea — On the Example of Food Markets," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:36:y:2020:i:2:p:1-18:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/minib-2020-0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2020-0013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/minib-2020-0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulf Schrader & John Thøgersen, 2011. "Putting Sustainable Consumption into Practice," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 3-8, March.
    2. Goryńska-Goldmann, Elżbieta & Adamczyk, Grażyna & Gazdecki, Michał, 2016. "Awareness Of Sustainable Consumption And Its Implications For The Selection Of Food Products," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 41(3).
    3. Isabel Richter & John Thøgersen & Christian A. Klöckner, 2017. "Sustainable Seafood Consumption in Action: Relevant Behaviors and their Predictors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Anna Lewandowska & Joanna Witczak & Pasquale Giungato & Christian Dierks & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Katarzyna Pawlak-Lemanska, 2018. "Inclusion of Life Cycle Thinking in a Sustainability-Oriented Consumer’s Typology: A Proposed Methodology and an Assessment Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michał Gazdecki & Elżbieta Goryńska-Goldmann & Marietta Kiss & Zoltán Szakály, 2021. "Segmentation of Food Consumers Based on Their Sustainable Attitude," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    2. Roberto Calisti & Primo Proietti & Andrea Marchini, 2019. "Promoting Sustainable Food Consumption: An Agent-Based Model About Outcomes of Small Shop Openings," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 22(1), pages 1-2.
    3. Iulia C. Muresan & Rezhen Harun & Felix H. Arion & Anca Monica Brata & Ioan Aurel Chereches & Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Diana E. Dumitras & Camelia F. Oroian & Olivia Paula Tirpe, 2021. "Consumers’ Attitude towards Sustainable Food Consumption during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Barkemeyer, Ralf & Young, C. William & Chintakayala, Phani Kumar & Owen, Anne, 2023. "Eco-labels, conspicuous conservation and moral licensing: An indirect behavioural rebound effect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    5. Moruzzi, R. & Sirieix, L., 2014. "Paradoxes of sustainable food and consumer coping strategies," Working Papers MoISA 201404, UMR MoISA : Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems (social and nutritional sciences): CIHEAM-IAMM, CIRAD, INRAE, L'Institut Agro, Montpellier SupAgro, IRD - Montpellier, France.
    6. Agata Niemczyk & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Donata Adler & Michał Niewiadomski & Eva Benková, 2023. "Green Entrepreneurship: Knowledge and Perception of Students and Professionals from Poland and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Jing Zhu & Muhammad Awais Shakir Goraya & Yu Cai, 2018. "Retailer–Consumer Sustainable Business Environment: How Consumers’ Perceived Benefits Are Translated by the Addition of New Retail Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Michael Luchs & Todd Mooradian, 2012. "Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: Elucidating the Gender Effect," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 127-144, March.
    9. Maria B. Forleo & Nadia Palmieri, 2023. "Environmental Attributes of Wild versus Farmed Tuna: Beliefs, Knowledge and Purchasing Choices of Italian Consumers of Canned Tuna," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Cristina Ciliberto & Katarzyna Szopik‐Depczyńska & Małgorzata Tarczyńska‐Łuniewska & Alessandro Ruggieri & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Enabling the Circular Economy transition: a sustainable lean manufacturing recipe for Industry 4.0," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3255-3272, November.
    11. Bong-Tae Kim & Min-Kyu Lee, 2018. "Consumer Preference for Eco-Labeled Seafood in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, September.
    12. Massimiliano Scopelliti & Daniela Barni & Elena Rinallo, 2022. "My Parents Taught…Green Was My Growth! The Role of Intergenerational Transmission of Ecological Values in Young Adults’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors and Their Psychosocial Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Isabel Richter & John Thøgersen & Christian A. Klöckner, 2018. "A Social Norms Intervention Going Wrong: Boomerang Effects from Descriptive Norms Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Jaroslaw Korpysa, 2013. "Buyer behaviour in the context of sustainable consumption policy pursued in Poland," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(Special 7), pages 702-713, November.
    15. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Mirosława Malinowska & Barbara Kucharska & Michał Kucia & Beata Kolny, 2021. "Sustainable Development as a Factor Differentiating Consumer Behavior: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 934-948.
    16. Sonia Abed-Elgani & Tamar Trop & Saher Ali & Boris A. Portnov, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Willingness of Arab Residents in Israel to Pay for Green Buildings: Results of a Survey among Potential Homebuyers in Acre and Nazareth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Yongsheng Zhang & Ilan Chabay, 2020. "How “Green Knowledge” Influences Sustainability through Behavior Change: Theory and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Marthe Austgulen, 2014. "Environmentally Sustainable Meat Consumption: An Analysis of the Norwegian Public Debate," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 45-66, March.
    19. Vasile Gherheș & Marcela Alina Fărcașiu, 2021. "Sustainable Behavior among Romanian Students: A Perspective on Electricity Consumption in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Ilaria Mancuso & Angelo Natalicchio & Umberto Panniello & Paolo Roma, 2021. "Understanding the Purchasing Behavior of Consumers in Response to Sustainable Marketing Practices: An Empirical Analysis in the Food Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable consumption; education; information; perception; messages;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:36:y:2020:i:2:p:1-18:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.