IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v16y2021i2p152-166n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the level of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian nuclear energy producers

Author

Listed:
  • Grishnova Olena

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Bereziuk Kateryna

    (Institute of Industrial Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Bilan Yuriy

    (Tomas Bata University of Zlin, Czech Republic; Sumy State University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The paper considers the role of the development of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian nuclear energy producers to ensure the effective functioning of this industry. National sustainable development in all social and economic spheres depends heavily on effective employee management where safety plays the main role. The purpose of the article is to evaluate the development of corporate social responsibility in NNEGC “Energoatom” and identify reserves for improving enterprise employee management. To achieve this goal, the method of SPACE analysis has been modified, because this tool is traditionally used as a method of strategic management. A system of 23 indicators has been developed to evaluate the level of corporate social responsibility in NNEGC Energoatom. Four groups of factors were identified, each of them was assessed by a set of relevant indicators. The article covers the activities of the enterprise during 2016-2020. On the basis of mathematical calculations, the SPACE-analysis matrix is constructed and the strategy of corporate social responsibility development is defined. The evaluation of the level of corporate social responsibility in NNEGC Energoatom indicates a high level of CSR. Despite the effective corporate social responsibility policy in NNEGC Energoatom, some problems still exist. The analysis allowed identifying the ways to improve the corporate social responsibility of nuclear energy producers, particularly to ensure a competitive salary, increase the level of occupational safety, improve the internal communication system. The practical value of the analysis lies in the fact that the modified method of SPACE-analysis can be used to evaluate the corporate social responsibility in different types of enterprises with different aims and objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Grishnova Olena & Bereziuk Kateryna & Bilan Yuriy, 2021. "Evaluation of the level of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian nuclear energy producers," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 152-166, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:152-166:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2021-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2021-0010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2021-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina-Mihaela Dima & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu & Gabriela Țigu, 2019. "Sustainable Social and Individual Implications of Telework: A New Insight into the Romanian Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Margaret Lindorff & Elizabeth Prior Jonson & Linda McGuire, 2012. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Controversial Industry Sectors: The Social Value of Harm Minimisation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(4), pages 457-467, November.
    3. Ye Cai & Hoje Jo & Carrie Pan, 2012. "Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 467-480, July.
    4. Kolk, Ans & van Tulder, Rob, 2010. "International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 119-125, April.
    5. Yates, Mariah & Hollensbe, Elaine, 2013. "On the Positives of Peripheral Corporate Social Responsibility," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 368-372, December.
    6. Bryan W. Husted & David B. Allen, 2009. "Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 781-799, December.
    7. Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee & Annabel‐Mauve Bonnefous, 2011. "Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 124-140, February.
    8. Teofana Dimitrova, 2017. "Evaluating The Strategic Position Of An Organisation Through Space Analysis," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 19-32.
    9. Grougiou, Vassiliki & Dedoulis, Emmanouil & Leventis, Stergios, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Organizational Stigma: The Case of “Sin” Industries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 905-914.
    10. Halyna MISHCHUK & Natalia SAMOLIUK & Yuriy BILAN, 2019. "Measuring Social Justice In The Light Of Effectiveness Of Public Distributive Policy," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2019(32), pages 63-76, June.
    11. Kato, Takaaki & Takahara, Shogo & Nishikawa, Masashi & Homma, Toshimitsu, 2013. "A case study of economic incentives and local citizens' attitudes toward hosting a nuclear power plant in Japan: Impacts of the Fukushima accident," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 808-818.
    12. Gennaioli, Caterina & Tavoni, Massimo, 2016. "Clean or dirty energy: evidence of corruption in the renewable energy sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65173, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Jiayuan Qiao & Siqin Yao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption: Implications for the Sustainable Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Michael K. Lindell & Ronald W. Perry, 1990. "Effects of the Chernobyl Accident on Public Perceptions of Nuclear Plant Accident Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 393-399, September.
    15. Streimikiene, Dalia & Simanaviciene, Zaneta & Kovaliov, Ruslan, 2009. "Corporate social responsibility for implementation of sustainable energy development in Baltic States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 813-824, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saif Ullah & Ravi S. Mateti, 2021. "Do appearances deceive? The curious case of CSR activities and shunned companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 11-29, January.
    2. Abubakr Saeed & Muhammad Saad Baloch & Hammad Riaz, 2022. "Global Insights on TMT Gender Diversity in Controversial Industries: A Legitimacy Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 711-731, September.
    3. Domenico Sardanelli & Francesca Conte & Agostino Vollero & Alfonso Siano, 2021. "CSR signals: exploring their use in controversial industries," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2021(3), pages 249-266, September.
    4. Heather Markham Kim & Kyuha Cho & Younggin Choi & Junghoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Casino Industry: A Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Jiayuan Qiao & Siqin Yao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption: Implications for the Sustainable Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Agostino Vollero & Francesca Conte & Alfonso Siano & Claudia Covucci, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 141-151, January.
    7. Yongqiang Gao & Miaohan Zhang & Haibin Yang, 2023. "Looking Good in the Eyes of Stakeholders: Corporate Giving and Corporate Acquisitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 375-396, June.
    8. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_013 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    10. Tomasz L. Nawrocki & Danuta Szwajca, 2021. "A Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of Involvement in CSR Activities of Energy Companies in the Context of Sustainable Development Challenges: Evidence from Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Alanda Venter & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2021. "Does institutional quality affect electricity supply? A panel SUR estimation," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 77-99.
    13. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    14. Ajay Kumar & Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3231-3253, November.
    15. Guidi, Marco & Sogiakas, Vasilios & Vagenas-Nanos, Evangelos & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2020. "Spreading the sin: An empirical assessment from corporate takeovers," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Leventis, Stergios & Hasan, Iftekhar & Dedoulis, Emmanouil, 2013. "The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 152-165.
    17. Agata JURKOWSKA-GOMULKA & Kamilla KURCZEWSKA & Yuriy BILAN, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility In Public Administration. Case Of Polish Central Administrative Institutions," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2021(36), pages 116-133, June.
    18. Ioannis Dokas & Georgios Oikonomou & Minas Panagiotidis & Eleftherios Spyromitros, 2023. "Macroeconomic and Uncertainty Shocks’ Effects on Energy Prices: A Comprehensive Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, February.
    19. Asriansyah Siran Mawung & Bambang Mantikei Jaya Budi & Lelo Sintani & Agus Satrya Wibowo, 2019. "Effects of Employee Commitment on Collectivism in the Workplace: Further Evidence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 504-513.
    20. Yang Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Governance Effects on Risk Management and Shareholder Wealth: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 4-2018, January-A.
    21. Tiffany Cheng Han Leung & Robin Stanley Snell, 2017. "Attraction or Distraction? Corporate Social Responsibility in Macao’s Gambling Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 637-658, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:16:y:2021:i:2:p:152-166:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.