IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ijcoma/v59y2023i4p18-33n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Remote Work Revolution: A Managerial View of the Tech Sector’s Response to the New Normal

Author

Listed:
  • Colak Murat

    (AGH University of Krakow, Krakow, Poland)

  • Saridogan Berkay C.

    (Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract

Background The global work landscape has undergone a significant transformation in the aftermath of the pandemic in 2019, resulting in the widespread adoption of remote working or working from home (WFH) practices. This paradigm shift has necessitated the adaptation of business strategies and the implementation of novel remote work policies by human resources (HR) and management departments within technology companies. Nevertheless, this rapid transition in the work model has introduced a range of benefits and drawbacks that warrant careful examination in terms of their impact on efficiency, challenges, recruitment processes, training, and psychological well-being. Research aims The primary objective of this study is to investigate and comprehend the impact of remote work applications within technology companies, specifically focusing on the changes experienced by management departments, challenges, recruitment practices, communication and engagement strategies, performance evaluation methods, and training programs. Methodology The study sample comprised of nine executives/managers who were currently employed in five distinct multinational technology companies. The research approach employed was qualitative in nature, utilizing a combination of interview, document review, and observation techniques. Findings The findings reveal varied impacts of remote work on organizational functioning in technology companies. Challenges in functions, responsibilities, and employee engagement were observed. Online evaluation systems and meetings were commonly adopted. The research supports the hypothesis and emphasizes the need for adaptation and tailored approaches in remote work environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Colak Murat & Saridogan Berkay C., 2023. "Exploring the Remote Work Revolution: A Managerial View of the Tech Sector’s Response to the New Normal," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 59(4), pages 18-33, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:59:y:2023:i:4:p:18-33:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/ijcm-2023-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcm-2023-0011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ijcm-2023-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suen, Hung-Yue & Hung, Kuo-En, 2024. "Revealing the influence of AI and its interfaces on job candidates' honest and deceptive impression management in asynchronous video interviews," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Chenfeng Yan & Quan Chen & Xinyue Zhou & Xin Dai & Zhilin Yang, 2024. "When the Automated fire Backfires: The Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer’s Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(4), pages 841-859, April.
    3. Zhang, Lixuan & Yencha, Christopher, 2022. "Examining perceptions towards hiring algorithms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Mallory Avery & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2023. "Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech," Monash Economics Working Papers 2023-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    5. Mahmut Ozer & Matjaz Perc & Hayri Eren Suna, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Bias and the Amplification of Inequalities in the Labor Market," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 69(69), pages 159-168, June.
    6. Leyer, Michael & Schneider, Sabrina, 2021. "Decision augmentation and automation with artificial intelligence: Threat or opportunity for managers?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 711-724.
    7. Hayley Clatterbuck & Clinton Castro & Arvo Mu~noz Mor'an, 2024. "Risk Alignment in Agentic AI Systems," Papers 2410.01927, arXiv.org.
    8. Roanne Voorst & Tanja Ahlin, 2024. "Key points for an ethnography of AI: an approach towards crucial data," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, December.
    9. Jing Wang & Zeyu Xing & Rui Zhang, 2023. "AI technology application and employee responsibility," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Weisman, Hannah & Wu, Chia-Huei & Yoshikawa, Katsuhiko & Lee, Hyun-Jung, 2022. "Antecedents of organizational identification: a review and agenda for future research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117626, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Mehdi Barati & Bahareh Ansari, 2022. "Effects of algorithmic control on power asymmetry and inequality within organizations," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 525-544, December.
    12. Fumagalli, Elena & Rezaei, Sarah & Salomons, Anna, 2022. "OK computer: Worker perceptions of algorithmic recruitment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(2).
    13. Jian Zhu & Bin Zhang & Hui Wang, 2024. "The double-edged sword effects of perceived algorithmic control on platform workers’ service performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ijcoma:v:59:y:2023:i:4:p:18-33:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.