IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/founma/v1y2009i2p25-44n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Realization Scheduling and its Multi Criteria Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Witkowski Tadeusz

    (Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Antczak Paweł

    (Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Antczak Arkadiusz

    (Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, 02-524 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

The paper focuses on project scheduling classification issues according to the type of constraints and optimization directions. Special attention was paid to production scheduling, presenting the basic issues in relation with product flow organizational criterion. Open-cluster issue was formulated and analyzed with the use of modern heuristics. Solution was evaluated with multiple criteria, mainly on the basis of time characteristics. Production process flow relations, in coordinates determined by operation sequence at particular workplaces, as well as the production type factor were presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Witkowski Tadeusz & Antczak Paweł & Antczak Arkadiusz, 2009. "Project Realization Scheduling and its Multi Criteria Evaluation," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 25-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:25-44:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/v10238-012-0009-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10238-012-0009-8
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10238-012-0009-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hapke, Maciej & Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej & Slowinski, Roman, 1998. "Interactive analysis of multiple-criteria project scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 315-324, June.
    2. Viana, Ana & Pinho de Sousa, Jorge, 2000. "Using metaheuristics in multiobjective resource constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 359-374, January.
    3. Lova, Antonio & Maroto, Concepcion & Tormos, Pilar, 2000. "A multicriteria heuristic method to improve resource allocation in multiproject scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 408-424, December.
    4. Tsai, Ying-Wei & D. Gemmill, Douglas, 1998. "Using tabu search to schedule activities of stochastic resource-constrained projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 129-141, November.
    5. Jacek Błażewicz & Klaus H. Ecker & Erwin Pesch & Günter Schmidt & Jan Węglarz, 2007. "Handbook on Scheduling," International Handbooks on Information Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-32220-7, November.
    6. W. J. Gutjahr & C. Strauss & E. Wagner, 2000. "A Stochastic Branch-and-Bound Approach to Activity Crashing in Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 125-135, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    2. He, Zhengwen & Liu, Renjing & Jia, Tao, 2012. "Metaheuristics for multi-mode capital-constrained project payment scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 605-613.
    3. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    4. Bogumiła Krzeszowska, 2013. "Three step procedure for a multiple criteria problem of project portfolio scheduling," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 23(4), pages 55-74.
    5. Zhengwen He & Nengmin Wang & Pengxiang Li, 2014. "Simulated annealing for financing cost distribution based project payment scheduling from a joint perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 203-220, February.
    6. Li, Haitao & Womer, Norman K., 2015. "Solving stochastic resource-constrained project scheduling problems by closed-loop approximate dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 20-33.
    7. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    8. Zhang, Cai Wen & Ong, Hoon Liong, 2004. "Solving the biobjective zero-one knapsack problem by an efficient LP-based heuristic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 545-557, December.
    9. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    10. Al-Fawzan, M. A. & Haouari, Mohamed, 2005. "A bi-objective model for robust resource-constrained project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 175-187, May.
    11. KIlIç, Murat & Ulusoy, Gündüz & Serifoglu, Funda Sivrikaya, 2008. "A bi-objective genetic algorithm approach to risk mitigation in project scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 202-216, March.
    12. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    13. Xiao, Jing & Wu, Zhou & Hong, Xi-Xi & Tang, Jian-Chao & Tang, Yong, 2016. "Integration of electromagnetism with multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for RCPSP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 22-35.
    14. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    15. Deng, Qichen & Santos, Bruno F., 2022. "Lookahead approximate dynamic programming for stochastic aircraft maintenance check scheduling optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 814-833.
    16. Malgorzata Sterna & Kateryna Czerniachowska, 2017. "Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme for Two Parallel Machines Scheduling with a Common Due Date to Maximize Early Work," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 927-944, September.
    17. Bredael, Dries & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2023. "Multi-project scheduling: A benchmark analysis of metaheuristic algorithms on various optimisation criteria and due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 54-75.
    18. Tien-Fu Liang & Tien-Shou Huang & Ming-Feng Yang, 2012. "Application of fuzzy mathematical programming to imprecise project management decisions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1451-1470, August.
    19. Cédric Verbeeck & Vincent Peteghem & Mario Vanhoucke & Pieter Vansteenwegen & El-Houssaine Aghezzaf, 2017. "A metaheuristic solution approach for the time-constrained project scheduling problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 353-371, March.
    20. Beşikci, Umut & Bilge, Ümit & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2015. "Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 22-31.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:founma:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:25-44:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.