IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecothe/v53y2015i3p398-414n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Orientation as a Basis for increasing supply chain Management Maturity

Author

Listed:
  • Radosavljević Marija

    (Univerzitet u Nišu, Ekonomski fakultet, Srbija)

Abstract

Process management is an essential element of modern management models, at the enterprise level, but also at the supply chain level. However, the importance of process management is explicitly indicated by the process management maturity models, through analysis of the level of process orientation, or through analysis of the level of quality of process orientation components. Starting from the fact that competition in modern conditions often takes place between supply chains, process management maturity grows into supply chain management maturity. Some of the supply chain management maturity models are SCMAT model, S(CM)2 model and SCPM3 model. In this paper the framework of another supply chain management maturity is formulated, by upgrading the SCOR model with process orientation, or SCORBPO model. This model involves analysis of the presence of supply chain management best practice, on one hand, and the presence of process orientation components, on the other hand. The aim of the research was to identify the maturity of enterprises in Serbia in applying supply chain management best practice, as well as process orientation components that are potential sources of competitive advantage or constraints for enterprises and supply chains. Analysis of justification of hypotheses is done by using correlation and regression analysis. The general conclusion is that between the presence of best practices and process orientation components there is a positive correlation, and that most of the process orientation components affect the implementation of supply chain management best practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Radosavljević Marija, 2015. "Process Orientation as a Basis for increasing supply chain Management Maturity," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 53(3), pages 398-414, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:53:y:2015:i:3:p:398-414:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/ethemes-2015-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2015-0023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ethemes-2015-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Van Looy & M. De Backer & G. Poels, 2011. "Defining Business Process Maturity. A Journey towards Excellence," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/725, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajko Novak & Aleksander Janes, 2017. "Merjenje zrelosti procesne usmerjenosti," UPP Monograph Series, University of Primorska Press, number 978-961-7023-55-8.
    2. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2014. "Process Maturity Of Short Food Supply Chains," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15.
    3. Ana Maria Magalhães Correia & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga & Carlos Otávio Senff & Luiz Carlos Duclós, 2021. "Analysis of the Maturity Level of Business Processes for Science and Technology Parks," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    4. Adamik Anna & Ghinea Valentina Mihaela & Ghinea Mihalache & Nowicki Michał, 2022. "Mapping the maturity of SMART WORLD trends as a tool for developing business excellence and reducing organizational complexity," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 193-219, June.
    5. Ma³gorzata Okrêglicka & Monika Mynarzova & Radomir Kana, 2015. "Business Process Maturity In Small And Mediumsized Enterprises," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 12(1), pages 121-131, DEcember.
    6. Jedrzej Charlampowicz & Andrzej S. Grzelakowski, 2022. "Maritime Container Terminal Process Maturity: A Methodological Approach and Empirical Evidence," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 636-644.
    7. Aleksander Janes & Rajko Novak, 2017. "Process Maturity Orientation Measurement," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    8. Marek Szelągowski & Justyna Berniak-Woźny, 2022. "How to improve the assessment of BPM maturity in the era of digital transformation," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 171-198, March.
    9. Adámek, Pavel, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of the Czech Excellence Award Winners," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2018), Split, Croatia, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Split, Croatia, 6-8 September 2018, pages 7-16, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    10. Jarosław Stanisław Kardas, 2023. "Job Crafting Competences and the Levels of Self-Organization, Job Satisfaction and Job Redesign in a Mature Organization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Farnoosh Bagheri & Rassoul Noorossana & Manoochehr Najmi, 2019. "The extent of EFQM effectiveness in routine and non-routine organizations based on multivariate techniques: an empirical study," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 237-267, March.
    12. Bag, Surajit & Yadav, Gunjan & Wood, Lincoln C. & Dhamija, Pavitra & Joshi, Sudhanshu, 2020. "Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: Resource melioration in logistics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:53:y:2015:i:3:p:398-414:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.