IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p3-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Process Maturity of Logistics Operators: Theoretical Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Jedrzej Charlampowicz
  • Cezary Mankowski

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to present a reference model for assessing the environmental process maturity of logistics operators, thereby providing a systematic framework for evaluating and enhancing sustainability practices within the logistics sector. Design/Methodology/Approach: The model is developed based on a comprehensive review of existing literature and best practices in environmental management, logistics, and organizational maturity models. The framework delineates maturity levels across six key dimensions: Environmental Policy, Operational Practices, Performance Measurement, Stakeholder Engagement, Digital Integration, and Continuous Improvement. Each maturity level represents a progressive stage of integration and sophistication in environmental management practices. Findings: The proposed model offers a diagnostic tool for logistics operators to assess their current environmental maturity levels and identify specific areas for improvement. By following a structured approach, operators can systematically enhance their environmental process maturity. The model emphasizes the importance of adopting best practices, leveraging advanced technologies, and fostering stakeholder engagement to achieve higher levels of sustainability. Practical implications: Logistics operators can use the model to develop targeted action plans, track progress, and make data-driven decisions to improve environmental performance. The framework provides a roadmap for progressive development, guiding operators from initial ad hoc practices to optimized, continuously improving processes. The adoption of this model can lead to significant improvements in operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation, as well as cost savings through resource optimization and waste reduction. Originality: This paper addresses a gap in the literature by proposing a specialized reference model tailored specifically to the logistics sector. The model integrates various dimensions of environmental process maturity, providing a holistic approach to sustainability in logistics operations. The inclusion of digital integration and continuous improvement as key dimensions highlights the model's relevance in the context of technological advancements and the dynamic nature of logistics operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jedrzej Charlampowicz & Cezary Mankowski, 2024. "Environmental Process Maturity of Logistics Operators: Theoretical Aspects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 3-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:3-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3419/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Libiao Bai & Hailing Wang & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang, 2018. "An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Jedrzej Charlampowicz & Andrzej S. Grzelakowski, 2022. "Maritime Container Terminal Process Maturity: A Methodological Approach and Empirical Evidence," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 636-644.
    3. Corbett, Charles J. & Pan, Jeh-Nan, 2002. "Evaluating environmental performance using statistical process control techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 68-83, May.
    4. A. Van Looy & M. De Backer & G. Poels, 2011. "Defining Business Process Maturity. A Journey towards Excellence," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 11/725, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Marta Kadłubek & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Joanna Domagała & Sandra Grabowska & Sebastian Saniuk, 2022. "Intelligent Transportation System Applications and Logistics Resources for Logistics Customer Service in Road Freight Transport Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajko Novak & Aleksander Janes, 2017. "Merjenje zrelosti procesne usmerjenosti," UPP Monograph Series, University of Primorska Press, number 978-961-7023-55-8.
    2. Malgorzata Gorzalczynska-Koczkodaj, 2023. "Intelligent Specializations as an Opportunity for Regional Development on the Example of the West Pomeranian Voivodeship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 446-455.
    3. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Yaoyao Wang & Yuanpei Kuang, 2023. "Evaluation, Regional Disparities and Driving Mechanisms of High-Quality Agricultural Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Tomasz Rokicki & Piotr Borawski & Aneta Beldycka-Borawska & Andras Szeberenyi & Luiza Ochnio & Bogdan Klepacki, 2024. "Resilience of Supply Chains in the Automotive Industry during the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Example of Polish Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 238-252.
    6. Fuyi Yao & Guiwen Liu & Yingbo Ji & Wenjing Tong & Xiaoyun Du & Kaijian Li & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek, 2020. "Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Construction within the Industrialized Building Process: A Monetization and Building Information Modelling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Tomasz Smutek & Jan Sikora & Sylwester Bogacki & Marek Rutkowski & Dariusz Wozniak, 2024. "Use of Autoencoder and One-Hot Encoding for Customer Segmentation," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special A), pages 72-82.
    8. Ilona Jacyna-Gołda & Nadiia Shmygol & Nataliia Gavkalova & Mariusz Salwin, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Intermodal Freight Transportation—Through the Integration of Logistics Flows in Ukraine and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Shamsuzzaman, Mohammad & Shamsuzzoha, Ahm & Maged, Ahmed & Haridy, Salah & Bashir, Hamdi & Karim, Azharul, 2021. "Effective monitoring of carbon emissions from industrial sector using statistical process control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    10. Xiaomin Zhao & Jiahui Li & Yang Li, 2022. "Impact of Environmental Tax on Corporate Sustainable Performance: Insights from High-Tech Firms in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Beata Meyer, 2023. "Use of Green and Water Areas in the Process of City Image Creation on the Example of Szczecin," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 553-562.
    12. Julia Nowicka & Zbigniew Ciekanowski & Mariusz Czternastek & Agnieszka Krol & Marzena Kacprzak, 2024. "Navigating Hybrid Threats: Advanced Security Solutions for Modern Organizations," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 488-499.
    13. Jedrzej Charlampowicz & Adrianna Karas, 2024. "Smart Ports Process Maturity Model – Theoretical Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 893-903.
    14. Mehrnaz Khalaj Hedayati & Dara G. Schniederjans, 2022. "Energy Management in Manufacturing: A Knowledge Management Perspective," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2014. "Process Maturity Of Short Food Supply Chains," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 2(4), pages 1-15.
    16. Luqi Wang & Xiaolong Xue & Yue Shi & Zeyu Wang & Ankang Ji, 2018. "A Dynamic Analysis to Evaluate the Environmental Performance of Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Aizenchtadt, Elena & Ingman, Dov & Friedler, Eran, 2008. "Quality control of wastewater treatment: A new approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(2), pages 445-458, September.
    18. Ambreen Shafqat & Qurat ul An Sabir & Su-Fen Yang & Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam & Kashif Abbas, 2024. "Monitoring and Comparing Air and Green House Gases Emissions of Various Countries," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(3), pages 621-644, September.
    19. Ying Ye & Kwok Hung Lau, 2022. "Competitive Green Supply Chain Transformation with Dynamic Capabilities—An Exploratory Case Study of Chinese Electronics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    20. J. N. Pan & Sheau-Chiann Chen, 2013. "Correlated Risk Assessment and Its Managerial Applications," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inland transport; process management; environmental process maturity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration
    • R49 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:3-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.