IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v40y2017i6p706-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study

Author

Listed:
  • Nam Seok Kim
  • Seung Sub Yoon
  • Donghyung Yook

Abstract

Walking has been highlighted as an independent transportation mode as well as an access/egress mode to/from public transit to encourage the use of more sustainable transport systems. However, walking does not seem to have priority over other transportation modes, especially in areas where various modes of movement are in conflict. The pedestrian push-button system seems to be a solution to distribute the right of way. The focus of this study is on the performance issue of the pedestrian push-button. Specifically, this study deals with issues related to mid-block crossings and attempts to answer two questions: whose waiting time is longer at pre-timed and push-button crossings, pedestrians, or vehicles? and which system – pre-timed or push-button – is better in terms of total waiting time? According to our simulation analyses, if the pedestrian flow rate is less than 120, 85, and 70 ped/h for two-, three-, and four-lane roads, respectively, the push-button system is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam Seok Kim & Seung Sub Yoon & Donghyung Yook, 2017. "Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 706-721, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:6:p:706-721
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2017.1325146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2017.1325146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2017.1325146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Yannis & E. Papadimitriou & A. Theofilatos, 2013. "Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 450-462, July.
    2. Ishaque, Muhammad Moazzam & Noland, Robert B., 2007. "Trade-offs between vehicular and pedestrian traffic using micro-simulation methods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 124-138, March.
    3. Andrew Hamilton & Ben Waterson & Tom Cherrett & Andrew Robinson & Ian Snell, 2013. "The evolution of urban traffic control: changing policy and technology," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 24-43, February.
    4. Hugo Pietrantonio & Luiz Fernando Bizerril Tourinho, 2006. "A Decision-based Criterion for Selecting Parameters in the Evaluation of Pedestrian Safety Problems with the Traffic Conflict Analysis Technique," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 183-216, January.
    5. J. D. Griffiths, 1981. "A Mathematical Model of a Nonsignalized Pedestrian Crossing," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 222-232, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuedong Hua & YinHai Wang & Weijie Yu & Wenbo Zhu & Wei Wang, 2019. "Control Strategy Optimization for Two-Lane Highway Lane-Closure Work Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Evers, Ruth & Proost, Stef, 2015. "The myth of traffic-responsive signal control: Why common sense does not always make sense," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 350-357.
    3. Wafaa Saleh & Monika Grigorova & Samia Elattar, 2020. "Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Grote, Matt & Waterson, Ben & Rudolph, Felix, 2021. "The impact of strategic transport policies on future urban traffic management systems," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 402-414.
    5. Yu, Hao & Ma, Rui & Zhang, H. Michael, 2018. "Optimal traffic signal control under dynamic user equilibrium and link constraints in a general network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 302-325.
    6. Jiaming Shi & Changxu Wu & Xiuying Qian, 2020. "The Effects of Multiple Factors on Elderly Pedestrians’ Speed Perception and Stopping Distance Estimation of Approaching Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Jia Shi & Xuesong Guo & Xiangnan Hu, 2019. "Engaging Stakeholders in Urban Traffic Restriction Policy Assessment Using System Dynamics: The Case Study of Xi’an City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Kun Wang & Liang Xu & Han Jiang, 2022. "Analysis of the Effect of Human-Machine Co-Driving Vehicle on Pedestrian Crossing Speed at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Road Sections: A VR-Based Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Chen, Qun & Wang, Yan, 2015. "Cellular automata (CA) simulation of the interaction of vehicle flows and pedestrian crossings on urban low-grade uncontrolled roads," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 43-57.
    10. Li, Xiang & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2015. "Studies of vehicle lane-changing to avoid pedestrians with cellular automata," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 251-271.
    11. Arshad Jamal & Muhammad Ijaz & Meshal Almosageah & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Zahid & Irfan Ullah & Rabia Emhamed Al Mamlook, 2022. "Implementing the Maximum Likelihood Method for Critical Gap Estimation under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Lachapelle, Ugo & Cloutier, Marie-Soleil, 2017. "On the complexity of finishing a crossing on time: Elderly pedestrians, timing and cycling infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 54-63.
    13. Li, Xiang & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2016. "Effects of vehicle–pedestrian interaction and speed limit on traffic performance of intersections," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 335-347.
    14. Farzaneh Montazeri & Fausto Errico & Luc Pellecuer, 2022. "Comparison of the Performance of Hybrid Traffic Signal Patterns and Conventional Alternatives When Accounting for Both Pedestrians and Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-33, October.
    15. Li, Xiang & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2014. "Effect of interactions between vehicles and pedestrians on fuel consumption and emissions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 416(C), pages 661-675.
    16. Vladimir NEMTINOV & Yulia NEMTINOVA & Andrey BORISENKO & Vladimir MOKROZUB, 2017. "Information Support Of Decision Making In Urban Passenger Transport Management," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 12(4), pages 83-90, December.
    17. Meneguzzer, C. & Rossi, R., 2013. "Analysis and control of the interaction between vehicular and pedestrian flows on roundabout approaches," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 53, pages 1-9.
    18. Fadyushin Alexey & Zakharov Dmitrii, 2020. "Influence of the Parameters of the Bus Lane and the Bus Stop on the Delays of Private and Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Nadine Schuurman & Blake Byron Walker & David Swanlund & Ofer Amram & Natalie L. Yanchar, 2020. "Qualitative Field Observation of Pedestrian Injury Hotspots: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Developing Built- and Socioeconomic-Environmental Risk Signatures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Hou, Yue & Zhang, Di & Li, Da & Deng, Zhiyuan, 2024. "Regional traffic flow combination prediction model considering virtual space of the road network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 637(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:6:p:706-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.