IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v77y2015icp350-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The myth of traffic-responsive signal control: Why common sense does not always make sense

Author

Listed:
  • Evers, Ruth
  • Proost, Stef

Abstract

Intuitively, one is inclined to think that traffic-responsive signal control is the most efficient control policy. In this paper, however, we show that for an intersection of two routes connecting one origin–destination pair where only one route is subject to congestion, anticipatory signal control performs better than traffic-responsive signal control. Furthermore, the unfolded logic behind this result suggests that the superiority of anticipatory signal control also extends to other networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Evers, Ruth & Proost, Stef, 2015. "The myth of traffic-responsive signal control: Why common sense does not always make sense," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 350-357.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:77:y:2015:i:c:p:350-357
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585641500124X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Hai & Yagar, Sam, 1995. "Traffic assignment and signal control in saturated road networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-139, March.
    2. Noland, Robert B., 2001. "Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 47-72, January.
    3. Andrew Hamilton & Ben Waterson & Tom Cherrett & Andrew Robinson & Ian Snell, 2013. "The evolution of urban traffic control: changing policy and technology," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 24-43, February.
    4. Dickson, Thomas J., 1981. "A note on traffic assignment and signal timings in a signal-controlled road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 267-271, August.
    5. Suh-Wen Chiou, 1999. "Optimization of Area Traffic Control for Equilibrium Network Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 279-289, August.
    6. Gartner, Nathan H. & Gershwin, Stanley B. & Little, John D. C. & Ross, Paul, 1980. "Pilot study of computer-based urban traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 203-217.
    7. Fisk, C. S., 1984. "Game theory and transportation systems modelling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(4-5), pages 301-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo & Qu, Zhuohua, 2018. "A risk-based game model for rational inspections in port state control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 477-495.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evers, Ruth & Proost, Stef, 2015. "Optimizing intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 100-119.
    2. Bielli, Maurizio & Reverberi, Pierfrancesco, 1996. "New operations research and artificial intelligence approaches to traffic engineering problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 550-572, August.
    3. Yang, Hai & Yagar, Sam, 1995. "Traffic assignment and signal control in saturated road networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-139, March.
    4. Ennio Cascetta & Mariano Gallo & Bruno Montella, 2006. "Models and algorithms for the optimization of signal settings on urban networks with stochastic assignment models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 301-328, April.
    5. Yu, Hao & Ma, Rui & Zhang, H. Michael, 2018. "Optimal traffic signal control under dynamic user equilibrium and link constraints in a general network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 302-325.
    6. Ceylan, Halim & Bell, Michael G. H., 2005. "Genetic algorithm solution for the stochastic equilibrium transportation networks under congestion," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 169-185, February.
    7. Yang, Hai, 1995. "Heuristic algorithms for the bilevel origin-destination matrix estimation problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 231-242, August.
    8. Smith, Mike & Mounce, Richard, 2011. "A splitting rate model of traffic re-routeing and traffic control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1389-1409.
    9. Smith, M.J. & Liu, R. & Mounce, R., 2015. "Traffic control and route choice: Capacity maximisation and stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 863-885.
    10. Gallo, Mariano & D'Acierno, Luca & Montella, Bruno, 2010. "A meta-heuristic approach for solving the Urban Network Design Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 144-157, February.
    11. Maher, Michael J. & Zhang, Xiaoyan & Vliet, Dirck Van, 2001. "A bi-level programming approach for trip matrix estimation and traffic control problems with stochastic user equilibrium link flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 23-40, January.
    12. Castillo González, Rodrigo & Clempner, Julio B. & Poznyak, Alexander S., 2019. "Solving traffic queues at controlled-signalized intersections in continuous-time Markov games," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 283-297.
    13. Meneguzzer, Claudio, 1995. "An equilibrium route choice model with explicit treatment of the effect of intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 329-356, October.
    14. Chiou, Suh-Wen, 2005. "Bilevel programming for the continuous transport network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 361-383, May.
    15. Les Foulds & Daniel Duarte & Hugo Nascimento & Humberto Longo & Bryon Hall, 2014. "Turning restriction design in traffic networks with a budget constraint," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 351-371, October.
    16. Liu, Ronghui & Smith, Mike, 2015. "Route choice and traffic signal control: A study of the stability and instability of a new dynamical model of route choice and traffic signal control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 123-145.
    17. Chiou, Suh-Wen, 2003. "TRANSYT derivatives for area traffic control optimisation with network equilibrium flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 263-290, March.
    18. D’Acierno, Luca & Gallo, Mariano & Montella, Bruno, 2012. "An Ant Colony Optimisation algorithm for solving the asymmetric traffic assignment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 459-469.
    19. Ying, Jiang Qian & Lu, Huapu & Shi, Jing, 2007. "An algorithm for local continuous optimization of traffic signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1189-1197, September.
    20. Josefsson, Magnus & Patriksson, Michael, 2007. "Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 4-31, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:77:y:2015:i:c:p:350-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.