IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v54y2016i10p2895-2906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for evaluating performance of flexibility in product recovery system

Author

Listed:
  • Jitender Madaan
  • Felix T.S. Chan
  • Ben Niu

Abstract

In view of the increasing business opportunities with changing customer attitudes and stricter legislations, the handling of returns has become a daunting challenge. The need for decision models for evaluating return performance has been observed in the academia and the corporate world. To improve return system performance, integrated flexible reverse enterprise systems have attracted attention from researchers as well as practitioners. This paper addresses these critical issues and proposes a novel integrated and Flexible recovery system decision model. The proposed model aims to facilitate enterprises in assessing their product recovery system capability, and in improving overall performance. The proposed model is a natural extension of several well-grounded policies for conventional reverse supply chains and can be verified on a simulation platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Jitender Madaan & Felix T.S. Chan & Ben Niu, 2016. "Strategies for evaluating performance of flexibility in product recovery system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2895-2906, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:10:p:2895-2906
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1120899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2015.1120899
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2015.1120899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byrne, M. D. & Bakir, M. A., 1999. "Production planning using a hybrid simulation - analytical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 305-311, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iuan-Yuan Lu & Tsuanq Kuo & Ting-Syuan Lin & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2016. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Develop Effective Sustainable Development Strategies for Enhancing Competitive Advantages: Case of the TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-31, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Taghizadeh & M. Bagherpour & I. Mahdavi, 2011. "An interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for multi-period multi-product production planning problem," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 393-410, December.
    2. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    3. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    4. Manda, A.B. & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Managing product transitions with learning and congestion effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Gopalswamy, Karthick & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Conic programming models for production planning with clearing functions: Formulations and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 953-966.
    6. Tien-Fu Liang, 2012. "Integrated manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multiple imprecise goals in an uncertain environment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-153, January.
    7. Tian, Feng & Willems, Sean P. & Kempf, Karl G., 2011. "An iterative approach to item-level tactical production and inventory planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 439-450, September.
    8. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    9. Kim, Bokang & Kim, Sooyoung, 2001. "Extended model for a hybrid production planning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 165-173, September.
    10. Vasant, Pandian M. & Barsoum, Nader N. & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2008. "Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 664-675, February.
    11. Jaime Miranda & Pablo A. Rey & Antoine Sauré & Richard Weber, 2018. "Metro Uses a Simulation-Optimization Approach to Improve Fare-Collection Shift Scheduling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 529-542, November.
    12. Julian Englberger & Frank Herrmann & Michael Manitz, 2016. "Two-stage stochastic master production scheduling under demand uncertainty in a rolling planning environment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6192-6215, October.
    13. Jakob Asmundsson & Ronald L. Rardin & Can Hulusi Turkseven & Reha Uzsoy, 2009. "Production planning with resources subject to congestion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 142-157, March.
    14. Djennas, Meriem & Benbouziane, Mohamed & Djennas, Mustapha, 2012. "Agent-Based Modeling in Supply Chain Management:A Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Logic Approach," MPRA Paper 41782, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Byrne, M.D. & Hossain, M.M., 2005. "Production planning: An improved hybrid approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 225-229, January.
    16. Gnoni, M. G. & Iavagnilio, R. & Mossa, G. & Mummolo, G. & Di Leva, A., 2003. "Production planning of a multi-site manufacturing system by hybrid modelling: A case study from the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 251-262, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:10:p:2895-2906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.