IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/41782.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agent-Based Modeling in Supply Chain Management:A Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Logic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Djennas, Meriem
  • Benbouziane, Mohamed
  • Djennas, Mustapha

Abstract

In today’s global market, reaching a competitive advantage by integrating firms in a supply chain management strategy becomes a key success for any firm seeking to survive in a complex environment. However, as interactions among agents in the supply chain management (SCM) remain unpredictable, simulation appears as a powerful tool aiming to predict market behavior and agents’ performance levels. This paper discusses the issues of supply chain management and the requirements for supply chain simulation modeling. It reviews the relationships amongArtificial Intelligence (AI) and SCM and concludes that under some conditions, SCM models exhibit some inadequacies that may be enriched by the use of AI tools. This approach aims to test the supply chain activities of nine companies in the crude oil market. The objective is to tackle the issues under which agents can coexist in a competitive environment. Furthermore, we will specify the supply chain management trading interaction amongagents by using an optimization approach based on a Genetic Algorithm (AG), Clustering and Fuzzy Logic (FL).Results support the view that the structured model provides a good tool for modeling the supply chain activities using AI methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Djennas, Meriem & Benbouziane, Mohamed & Djennas, Mustapha, 2012. "Agent-Based Modeling in Supply Chain Management:A Genetic Algorithm and Fuzzy Logic Approach," MPRA Paper 41782, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:41782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41782/1/MPRA_paper_41782.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87438/1/MPRA_paper_41782.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andersson, Par & Aronsson, Hakan & Storhagen, Nils G., 1989. "Measuring logistics performance," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1-4), pages 253-262, August.
    2. Evans, G. N. & Naim, M. M. & Towill, D. R., 1998. "Application of a simulation methodology to the redesign of a logistical control system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 157-168, September.
    3. Byrne, M. D. & Bakir, M. A., 1999. "Production planning using a hybrid simulation - analytical approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 305-311, March.
    4. Kim, Bokang & Kim, Sooyoung, 2001. "Extended model for a hybrid production planning approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 165-173, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Taghizadeh & M. Bagherpour & I. Mahdavi, 2011. "An interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for multi-period multi-product production planning problem," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 393-410, December.
    2. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    3. Gopalswamy, Karthick & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Conic programming models for production planning with clearing functions: Formulations and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 953-966.
    4. Tian, Feng & Willems, Sean P. & Kempf, Karl G., 2011. "An iterative approach to item-level tactical production and inventory planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 439-450, September.
    5. Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Srikant Gupta & Aquil Ahmed & Irfan Ali, 2024. "An integrated multi-objective multi-product inventory managed production planning problem under uncertain environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1679-1723, August.
    6. Diaz, Juan Esteban & Handl, Julia & Xu, Dong-Ling, 2018. "Integrating meta-heuristics, simulation and exact techniques for production planning of a failure-prone manufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 976-989.
    7. Vasant, Pandian M. & Barsoum, Nader N. & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2008. "Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 664-675, February.
    8. Jaime Miranda & Pablo A. Rey & Antoine Sauré & Richard Weber, 2018. "Metro Uses a Simulation-Optimization Approach to Improve Fare-Collection Shift Scheduling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 529-542, November.
    9. Jakob Asmundsson & Ronald L. Rardin & Can Hulusi Turkseven & Reha Uzsoy, 2009. "Production planning with resources subject to congestion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 142-157, March.
    10. Byrne, M.D. & Hossain, M.M., 2005. "Production planning: An improved hybrid approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 225-229, January.
    11. Phillip O. Kriett & Sebastian Eirich & Martin Grunow, 2017. "Cycle time-oriented mid-term production planning for semiconductor wafer fabrication," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4662-4679, August.
    12. Amirteimoori, Alireza & Kordrostami, Sohrab, 2012. "Production planning in data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 212-218.
    13. Emenike, Scholastica N. & Falcone, Gioia, 2020. "A review on energy supply chain resilience through optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Lin, J. & Naim, M.M. & Purvis, L. & Gosling, J., 2017. "The extension and exploitation of the inventory and order based production control system archetype from 1982 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 135-152.
    15. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2016. "Workload control in job shops with re-entrant flows: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5136-5150, September.
    16. Aggelogiannaki, Eleni & Sarimveis, Haralambos, 2008. "Design of a novel adaptive inventory control system based on the online identification of lead time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 781-792, August.
    17. Jitender Madaan & Felix T.S. Chan & Ben Niu, 2016. "Strategies for evaluating performance of flexibility in product recovery system," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2895-2906, May.
    18. Hsiao, H.I. & Kemp, R.G.M. & van der Vorst, J.G.A.J. & (Onno) Omta, S.W.F., 2010. "A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 75-86, March.
    19. Pürgstaller, Peter & Missbauer, Hubert, 2012. "Rule-based vs. optimisation-based order release in workload control: A simulation study of a MTO manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 670-680.
    20. Chen-Fu Chien & Chung-Jen Kuo & Chih-Min Yu, 2020. "Tool allocation to smooth work-in-process for cycle time reduction and an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 1009-1033, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Supply Chain Management; Genetic Algorithm; Fuzzy Logic; Clustering; Optimization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:41782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.