IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v53y2015i24p7226-7237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A co-availability scheduling model for coordinating multi-disciplinary care teams

Author

Listed:
  • Serpil Mutlu
  • James Benneyan
  • John Terrell
  • Victoria Jordan
  • Ayten Turkcan

Abstract

We introduce a co-availability scheduling problem that arises in various healthcare settings in which personnel from different disciplines work together as care teams and for which synchronisation of their availability impacts scheduling flexibility and procedure timeliness. Examples include breast cancer surgery involving oncologic and plastic surgeons, primary and specialty care integrated visits, and vascular interventions involving cardiac surgeons, radiologists and radiology technicians. We develop an integer programming model to help create optimal schedules that maximise the amount of co-available time across the scheduling templates of the desired team members, while still satisfying each of their clinic coverage, preference and extraneous responsibilities constraints. Application to breast surgery at a major cancer centre increased team co-availability by 94%, with sensitivity analysis in other scenarios producing 64--152%, increases in favourable team assignments, and without negatively affecting operating room neither utilisation nor surgery delays.

Suggested Citation

  • Serpil Mutlu & James Benneyan & John Terrell & Victoria Jordan & Ayten Turkcan, 2015. "A co-availability scheduling model for coordinating multi-disciplinary care teams," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7226-7237, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:24:p:7226-7237
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1018452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2015.1018452
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2015.1018452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst, A. T. & Jiang, H. & Krishnamoorthy, M. & Sier, D., 2004. "Staff scheduling and rostering: A review of applications, methods and models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(1), pages 3-27, February.
    2. Cardoen, Brecht & Demeulemeester, Erik & Beliën, Jeroen, 2010. "Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 921-932, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean Harris & David Claudio, 2022. "Current Trends in Operating Room Scheduling 2015 to 2020: a Literature Review," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-42, March.
    2. A. G. Leeftink & I. M. H. Vliegen & E. W. Hans, 2019. "Stochastic integer programming for multi-disciplinary outpatient clinic planning," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 53-67, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young-Chae Hong & Amy Cohn & Stephen Gorga & Edmond O’Brien & William Pozehl & Jennifer Zank, 2019. "Using Optimization Techniques and Multidisciplinary Collaboration to Solve a Challenging Real-World Residency Scheduling Problem," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 201-212, May.
    2. Lotfi Hidri & Achraf Gazdar & Mohammed M. Mabkhot, 2020. "Optimized Procedure to Schedule Physicians in an Intensive Care Unit: A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Knut Haase & Mathias Kasper & Matthes Koch & Sven Müller, 2019. "A Pilgrim Scheduling Approach to Increase Safety During the Hajj," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 376-406, March.
    4. H. Romero & N. Dellaert & S. Geer & M. Frunt & M. Jansen-Vullers & G. Krekels, 2013. "Admission and capacity planning for the implementation of one-stop-shop in skin cancer treatment using simulation-based optimization," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 75-86, March.
    5. Van den Bergh, Jorne & Beliën, Jeroen & De Bruecker, Philippe & Demeulemeester, Erik & De Boeck, Liesje, 2013. "Personnel scheduling: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 367-385.
    6. Maenhout, Broos & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A hybrid scatter search heuristic for personalized crew rostering in the airline industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 155-167, October.
    7. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    8. Ellen Bockstal & Broos Maenhout, 2019. "A study on the impact of prioritising emergency department arrivals on the patient waiting time," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 589-614, December.
    9. repec:ipg:wpaper:2013-014 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Michael R. Miller & Robert J. Alexander & Vincent A. Arbige & Robert F. Dell & Steven R. Kremer & Brian P. McClune & Jane E. Oppenlander & Joshua P. Tomlin, 2017. "Optimal Allocation of Students to Naval Nuclear-Power Training Units," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 320-335, August.
    11. Sandeep Rath & Kumar Rajaram, 2022. "Staff Planning for Hospitals with Implicit Cost Estimation and Stochastic Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    12. Schmid, Verena & Doerner, Karl F. & Laporte, Gilbert, 2013. "Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 435-448.
    13. Song, Kwonsik & Kim, Sooyoung & Park, Moonseo & Lee, Hyun-Soo, 2017. "Energy efficiency-based course timetabling for university buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 394-405.
    14. Steffen Heider & Jan Schoenfelder & Thomas Koperna & Jens O. Brunner, 2022. "Balancing control and autonomy in master surgery scheduling: Benefits of ICU quotas for recovery units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 311-332, June.
    15. Sebastian Rachuba & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for robust operating room schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 325-350, April.
    16. Gréanne Leeftink & Erwin W. Hans, 2018. "Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 17-33, February.
    17. X Zhang & A Chakravarthy & Q Gu, 2009. "Equipment scheduling problem under disruptions in mail processing and distribution centres," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(5), pages 598-610, May.
    18. Zhang, Yu & Wang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu & Lim, Andrew, 2020. "Mitigating overtime risk in tactical surgical scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Saravanan Kesavan & Susan J. Lambert & Joan C. Williams & Pradeep K. Pendem, 2022. "Doing Well by Doing Good: Improving Retail Store Performance with Responsible Scheduling Practices at the Gap, Inc," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7818-7836, November.
    20. Şeyda Gür & Mehmet Pınarbaşı & Hacı Mehmet Alakaş & Tamer Eren, 2023. "Operating room scheduling with surgical team: a new approach with constraint programming and goal programming," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1061-1085, December.
    21. Patrik Eveborn & Mikael Rönnqvist & Helga Einarsdóttir & Mats Eklund & Karin Lidén & Marie Almroth, 2009. "Operations Research Improves Quality and Efficiency in Home Care," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 18-34, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:24:p:7226-7237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.