IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v49y2015i6p1074-1086.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Devolution Increase Accountability? Empirical Evidence from the Implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Polverari

Abstract

P olverari L. Does devolution increase accountability? Empirical evidence from the implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy, Regional Studies . The period from the late 1990s to the early 2000s witnessed trends of decentralization, deconcentration or devolution of competencies from the national to the sub-national levels in a variety of countries. Implicit or explicit in many of the discussions about devolution is the assumption that by bringing the design and delivery of policy 'closer to the people', it increases accountability. The main proposition of this paper is to test this common assumption. Focusing, as a test case, on the implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy in two meso-level territorial units with recent experience of devolution, the paper investigates empirically whether the new, devolved institutional framework within which the policy operates is indeed more conducive to accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Polverari, 2015. "Does Devolution Increase Accountability? Empirical Evidence from the Implementation of European Union Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 1074-1086, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:1074-1086
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.1001351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00343404.2014.1001351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343404.2014.1001351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Mendez & John Bachtler, 2017. "Financial Compliance in the European Union: A Cross-National Assessment of Financial Correction Patterns and Causes in Cohesion Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 569-592, May.
    2. Ekaterina Domorenok & Paolo Graziano & Laura Polverari, 2021. "Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy [Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature rev," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(1), pages 58-78.
    3. Eirini Aivazidou & Giovanni Cunico & Edoardo Mollona, 2020. "Beyond the EU Structural Funds’ Absorption Rate: How Do Regions Really Perform?," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Cunico, Giovanni & Aivazidou, Eirini & Mollona, Edoardo, 2021. "Beyond financial proxies in Cohesion Policy inputs’ monitoring: A system dynamics approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    2. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484.
    3. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.
    4. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Rebora, Gianfranco & Turri, Matteo, 2013. "The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1657-1666.
    6. Ahmed Huque, 2013. "Can Public Management Contribute to Governance in Developing Countries?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 397-409, December.
    7. Odeck, James & Høyem, Harald, 2021. "The impact of competitive tendering on operational costs and market concentration in public transport: The Norwegian car ferry services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    9. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    10. Chanida Jittaruttha, 2017. "Public Trust and Governance in Public Administration in Thailand," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5808123, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    11. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.
    12. Gentiana Kraja, 2013. "Managing Human Resources in Albanian Public Administration," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, March.
    13. Ishchenko M.P. & Samoilenko L.Y., 2016. "Contemporary Issues Of Public Management And Administration In Ukraine," Management, Academy of Municipal Administration, vol. 9(2), pages 7-15, May.
    14. Andrews, Matt, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," Working Paper Series 15-063, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    15. Koen Verhoest & Paola Mattei, 2010. "Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-171, March.
    16. Imre Gergely Szabó & Marta Kahancová, 2012. "Acting on the Edge of Public Sector: Hospital Corporatization and Collective Bargaining in Hungary and Slovakia," Discussion Papers 1, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    17. Nizar Al-Sharif & Nazha Bourquia, 2011. "Les systèmes de mesure de performance en collectivités territoriales : un éclairage à la lecture du processus d'institutionnalisation," Post-Print hal-00645365, HAL.
    18. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2017. "Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Peter Taylor-Gooby, 2008. "Sociological approaches to risk: strong in analysis but weak in policy influence in recent UK developments," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 863-876, October.
    20. Gyorgy JENEI, 2012. "Challenges For Governance And Shortcomings At The Answers In Central Europe," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 48, pages 13-20, March.
    21. Villani, Salvatore, 2010. "Elementi ai fini della definizione della nozione di costo standard: una rassegna della letteratura e delle principali esperienze estere [Basic elements defining the standard cost concept. A survey ," MPRA Paper 29683, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:49:y:2015:i:6:p:1074-1086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.