IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i8p719-730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Clustering and State/County Legislation: The Case of Hog Production in Missouri

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Matisziw
  • James Hipple

Abstract

This work investigates the spatial dynamics currently at work in the Missouri hog production industry with regard to confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs). Through a quantitative analysis of enterprise size and an interpretation of legal and social pressures in the area, clustering of production facilities within the industry is examined. State legislation was found to influence various sizes of CAFOs in how they cluster. As a whole, the largest CAFOs were found to be the most influenced due to their heavily restricted geography while smaller CAFOs were less influenced by state laws. Cette etude cherche a examiner la dynamique spatiale qui joue a l'heure actuelle dans l'elevage porcin dans le Missouri pour ce qui concerne la delimitation geographique de l'alimentation des animaux (confined animal feeding operation; CAFO). A partir d'une analyse quantitative de la taille d'entreprise et d'une interpretation des forces juridiques et sociales locales, on examine la tendance a la concentration geographique des installations de production de cette industrie. Il s'avere que la legislation d'etat influence la tendance a la concentration geographique des CAFO en fonction de leur taille. Dans l'ensemble, il s'avere que les plus grandes CAFO sont les plus influencees acause de leur delimitation geographique restreinte, tandis que les plus petites CAFO sont moins inflencees par la legislation d'etat. Diese Arbeit untersucht die raumliche Dynamik, die z.Z. bei der Schweinezucht im Missouri bezuglich Durchfuhrung der Futterung von in Stall gezuchteten Tieren (Confined Animal Feeding Operations - CAFOs) zu beobachten ist. Kluster von Zuchtanlagen in diesem Industriezweig werden sowohl einer quantitiven Analyse der Grosse der jeweiligen Unternehmen unterworfen als auch einer Interpretation des gesetzlichen und des gesellschaftlichen Druckes, die auf diesem Gebiet auftreten. Es stellt sich heraus, dass staatliche Gesetzgebung sich auf den unterschiedlichen Umfang der CAFOs bezuglich Art und Weise ihrer Ballung auswirkt. Im Grossen und Ganzen ergab sich, dass die grossten CAFOs dank ihrer sehr beschrankten Ausdehnung am sta¨rksten beeinflusst, wa¨hrend kleinere CAFOs weniger von staatlichen Verordungen betroffen werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Matisziw & James Hipple, 2001. "Spatial Clustering and State/County Legislation: The Case of Hog Production in Missouri," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(8), pages 719-730.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:8:p:719-730
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400120084704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400120084704
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400120084704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. James Rhodes, 1995. "The Industrialization of Hog Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 107-118.
    2. Alan Barkema & Michael L. Cook, 1993. "The changing U.S. pork industry: a dilemma for public policy," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, vol. 78(Q II), pages 49-65.
    3. Martin, Laura L. & Norris, Patricia E., 1998. "Environmental Quality, Environmental Regulation And The Structure Of Animal Agriculture," Agricultural Outlook Forum 1998 33267, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adhikari, Bishwa B. & Harsh, Stephen B. & Cheney, Laura Martin, 2003. "Factors Affecting Regional Shifts Of U.S Pork Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22200, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Weersink, Alfons, 2004. "The Locational Determinants Of Large Livestock Operations: Evidence From The U.S. Hog, Dairy, And Fed-Cattle Sectors," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19927, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Martinez, Stephen W., 1999. "Vertical Coordination in the Pork and Broiler Industries: Implications for Pork and Chicken Products," Agricultural Economic Reports 34031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Gary L. Benjamin, 1997. "Industrialization in hog production: implications for Midwest agriculture," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 21(Jan), pages 2-13.
    5. Pritchett, James G. & Liu, Donald J., 1998. "Estimating Backward Integration In A Primary Input Market: The Case Of U.S. Hog Industry," Conference Papers 14480, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    6. Park, Dooho & Seidl, Andrew F. & Davies, Stephen P. & Frasier, W. Marshall, 2000. "Environmental Policy Influences On Livestock Stocking And Location Decisions," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36340, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Anderson, David P. & Mintert, James R. & Brester, Gary W., 1998. "The North American Livestock Industry: A U.S. Perspective," Proceedings of the 4th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop 1998: Economic Harmonization in the Canadian\U.S.\Mexican Grain-Livestock Subsector; 16765, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    8. Sneeringer Stacy E, 2009. "Effects of Environmental Regulation on Economic Activity and Pollution in Commercial Agriculture," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, July.
    9. Goodhue, Rachael E., 1997. "Production Control and Production Contracts: Why Do Integrators Control Inputs?," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35908, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Castle, Emery N., 1998. "Agricultural Industrialization in the American Countryside," Policy Studies Program Reports, Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, number 134118, January.
    11. Blemings, Benjamin T. & Bock, Margaret & Scarcioffolo, Alexandre, 2022. "Hoggin' the Road: Negative Road Externalities of Pork Slaughterhouses," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322466, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Dimitri, Carolyn & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2001. "Cash Market Or Contract? How Technology And Consumer Demand Influence The Decision," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20723, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Sanjib Bhuyan, 2002. "Impact of Vertical Mergers on Industry Profitability: An Empirical Evaluation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 20(1), pages 61-79, February.
    14. McBride, William D. & Key, Nigel D., 2003. "Economic And Structural Relationships In U.S. Hog Production," Agricultural Economic Reports 33971, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Herath, Deepananda P.B. & Weersink, Alfons & Carpentier, Chantal Line, 2005. "Spatial Dynamics of the Livestock Sector in the United States: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Franken, Jason & Parcell, Joe & Patterson, David & Smith, Michael & Poock, Scott, 2010. "Cow-Calf Producer Interest in Retained Ownership," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 28(1).
    17. Miller, Gay Y. & Liu, Xuanli & McNamara, Paul E. & Bush, Eric J., 2003. "Producer Incentives For Antibiotic Use In U.S. Pork Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21931, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Thurow, Amy Purvis & Holt, John, 1997. "Induced Policy Innovation: Enivronmental Compliance Requirements For Dairies In Texas And Florida," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-20, July.
    19. McBride, William D. & Key, Nigel D., 2001. "Factors Affecting Contractor And Grower Success In Hog Contracting," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20552, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Algozin, Kenneth A. & Miller, Gay Y. & McNamara, Paul E., 2001. "An Econometric Analysis Of The Economic Contribution Of Subtherapeutic Antibiotic Use In Pork Production," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20633, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:8:p:719-730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.