IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i4p2158244013511259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preventing Cooperative Knowledge Production From Falling Apart

Author

Listed:
  • Christer Theandersson
  • Bertil Rolandsson

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze why work life representatives are engaging themselves in joint knowledge production with academia. We intend to deepen our understanding of how the practitioners’ trust in academia is constituted, that is what trust-building practices conditions their trust. The article is based on interviews with practitioners who are cooperating with a Swedish research center. The result indicates that practitioners’ trust in cooperation is based on a combination of different trust-building practices, among which the academy as a dependable supplier of objective and authoritative knowledge production is still important. At the same time, practitioners’ trust is also dependent on the existence of shared and integrated knowledge production relevant to their professions. The main conclusion of the study is that academia has to manage a set of different conditions demanding that different trust-building practices be combined and managed for trust to be maintained.

Suggested Citation

  • Christer Theandersson & Bertil Rolandsson, 2013. "Preventing Cooperative Knowledge Production From Falling Apart," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:2158244013511259
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013511259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013511259
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013511259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Hartley & John Benington, 2006. "Copy and Paste, or Graft and Transplant? Knowledge Sharing Through Inter-Organizational Networks," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 101-108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luc Bernier & Taïeb Hafsi & Carl Deschamps, 2015. "Environmental Determinants of Public Sector Innovation: A study of innovation awards in Canada," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 834-856, July.
    2. Lummina Horlings & Chris Collinge & John Gibney, 2017. "Relational knowledge leadership and local economic development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(2), pages 95-109, March.
    3. Jean Hartley, 2014. "New development: Eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 227-232, May.
    4. Jean Hartley, 2017. "Optimism of the will in the cocreation and use of research by academics and practitioners," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 236-239, June.
    5. Tønnessen, Øystein & Dhir, Amandeep & Flåten, Bjørn-Tore, 2021. "Digital knowledge sharing and creative performance: Work from home during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Cheng, Jao-Hong, 2011. "Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing in green supply chains—Moderating by relational benefits and guanxi," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 837-849.
    7. Allen, April D. & Hyde, Justeen & Leslie, Laurel K., 2012. "“I Don't Know What They Know”: Knowledge transfer in mandated referral from child welfare to early intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1050-1059.
    8. Patrick Reichert & Marek Hudon & Ariane Szafarz & Robert K. Christensen, 2021. "Crowding-In or Crowding-Out? How Subsidies Signal the Path to Financial Independence of Social Enterprises," Working Papers CEB 21-014, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Weber, K. Matthias & Heller-Schuh, Barbara & Godoe, Helge & Roeste, Rannveig, 2014. "ICT-enabled system innovations in public services: Experiences from intelligent transport systems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 539-557.
    10. Havas, Attila & Weber, K. Matthias, 2017. "The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 327-337.
    11. Jäkel Tim, 2019. "Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 27-53, June.
    12. Arwin van Buuren & Jasper Eshuis & Nanny Bressers, 2015. "The Governance of Innovation in Dutch Regional Water Management: Organizing fit between organizational values and innovative concepts," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 679-697, May.
    13. Jenke, Michael & Pretzsch, Jürgen, 2021. "Network administrators facilitate information sharing among communal forest organizations in Thailand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    14. Leonor Barroca & Helen Sharp & Dina Salah & Katie Taylor & Peggy Gregory, 2018. "Bridging the gap between research and agile practice: an evolutionary model," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 323-334, April.
    15. Fussell, Cathy, 2023. "What at power-with looks like and why we should choose it," SocArXiv fky6t, Center for Open Science.
    16. Cheng, Jao-Hong & Fu, Ya-Chi, 2013. "Inter-organizational relationships and knowledge sharing through the relationship and institutional orientations in supply chains," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 473-484.
    17. Cheng, Jao-Hong, 2011. "Inter-organizational relationships and information sharing in supply chains," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 374-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:2158244013511259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.