IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v44y2017i3p373-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heuristic estimation of container stacking and reshuffling operations under the containership delay factor and mega-ship challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Gharehgozli
  • Joan P. Mileski
  • Okan Duru

Abstract

This paper addresses a highly researched area, the reshuffling problem in ports, using a new paradigm-modified containership service order in light of credit risk assessment. Container stacking and reshuffling operations can cause ship delays and additional risk. In deep-sea terminals, outbound containers are tightly stacked according to the retrieval sequence. Due to lack of space, terminals stack containers in multiple tiers. This means any delay in the arrival of a ship can impose extra handlings and reshuffling of containers delaying future cargo handling. This paper addresses the reshuffling problem with a concept similar to the credit scoring and rating of creditworthiness used in the banking industry. By utilizing this comparison to the banking credit risk concept, a heuristic estimation model is proposed that illustrates the side effects of unscheduled modifications in containership service order. Further, the mega-ship trend amplifies the reshuffling debate. Probability of delay, reshuffles given delay, and call size at delay are introduced as the three-point risk metrics of the model. Numerical simulations illustrate the functionality to develop terminal stacking strategies as well as emphasize the mega-ship phenomenon and its side effects on terminals (i.e. yard operation deadlock).

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Gharehgozli & Joan P. Mileski & Okan Duru, 2017. "Heuristic estimation of container stacking and reshuffling operations under the containership delay factor and mega-ship challenge," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 373-391, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:373-391
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1295328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2017.1295328
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2017.1295328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Itf, 2015. "The Impact of Mega-Ships," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milan Janić, 2018. "Multidimensional examination of the performances of a liner shipping network: trunk line/route operated by conventional (Panamax Max) and mega (ULC - ultra large container) ships," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-35, December.
    2. Amir Gharehgozli & Debjit Roy & Suruchika Saini & Jan-Kees Ommeren, 2023. "Loading and unloading trains at the landside of container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 549-575, September.
    3. Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Jorge Barnett Lawton & Morten Svindland, 2024. "An evolution of the Global Container Shipping Network: port connectivity and trading community structure (2011–2017)," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 283-306, June.
    4. Gharehgozli, Amir Hossein & Vernooij, Floris Gerardus & Zaerpour, Nima, 2017. "A simulation study of the performance of twin automated stacking cranes at a seaport container terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 108-128.
    5. Alexandros M. Goulielmos, 2018. "“After End-2008 Structural Changes in Containership Market” and Their Impact on Industry’s Policy," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Zhou, Chenhao & Wang, Wencheng & Li, Haobin, 2020. "Container reshuffling considered space allocation problem in container terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    8. Nima Zaerpour & Amir Gharehgozli & René De Koster, 2019. "Vertical Expansion: A Solution for Future Container Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1235-1251, September.
    9. Gharehgozli, Amir & Yu, Yugang & de Koster, René & Du, Shaofu, 2019. "Sequencing storage and retrieval requests in a container block with multiple open locations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 261-284.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athanasios A. Pallis & Aimilia A. Papachristou & Charalampos Platias, 2017. "Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(1), pages 54-70, January-M.
    2. Francesco Parola & Marcello Risitano & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 2017. "The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 116-138, January.
    3. Milan Janić, 2018. "Multidimensional examination of the performances of a liner shipping network: trunk line/route operated by conventional (Panamax Max) and mega (ULC - ultra large container) ships," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-35, December.
    4. Ronald A. Halim & Lucie Kirstein & Olaf Merk & Luis M. Martinez, 2018. "Decarbonization Pathways for International Maritime Transport: A Model-Based Policy Impact Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    6. Olaf M. Merk, 2020. "Quantifying tax subsidies to shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 517-535, December.
    7. Enrico Musso & Anna Sciomachen, 2020. "Impact of megaships on the performance of port container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 432-445, September.
    8. Enrico Musso & Anna Sciomachen, 0. "Impact of megaships on the performance of port container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    9. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Alessandro Hill & Jürgen W. Böse, 0. "A decision support system for improved resource planning and truck routing at logistic nodes," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-11.
    11. Carlo Altomonte & Laura Bonacorsi & Italo Colantobe, 2018. "Trade and Growth in the Age of Global Value Chains," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1897, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    12. Pinto Claudio Jose & Anunciacao Pedro Fernandes, 2020. "European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 38-49, December.
    13. Alessandro Hill & Jürgen W. Böse, 2017. "A decision support system for improved resource planning and truck routing at logistic nodes," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 241-251, September.
    14. Katrien Storms & Christa Sys & Thierry Vanelslander & Ruben Deuren, 2023. "Demurrage and detention: from operational challenges towards solutions," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-31, December.
    15. Jiawei Ge & Mo Zhu & Mei Sha & Theo Notteboom & Wenming Shi & Xuefeng Wang, 2021. "Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(4), pages 587-614, December.
    16. David Jaffee, 2019. "Neoliberal urbanism as ‘Strategic Coupling’ to global chains: Port infrastructure and the role of economic impact studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 119-136, February.
    17. Christian Darko & Giovanni Occhiali & Enrico Vanino, 2021. "The Chinese are Here: Import Penetration and Firm Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 2112-2135, December.
    18. de Oliveira, Gabriel Figueiredo & Cariou, Pierre & Monios, Jason, 2023. "Mobility in European container port rankings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Darko, Christian K. & Occhiali, Giovanni & Vanino, Enrico, 2018. "The Chinese are Here: Firm Level Analysis of Import Competition and Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa," ETA: Economic Theory and Applications 273142, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    20. Sdoukopoulos, Eleftherios & Boile, Maria, 2020. "Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:3:p:373-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.