IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v17y2020i2p38-49n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU

Author

Listed:
  • Pinto Claudio Jose

    (APS (Ports of Sines and Algarve Authority), Sines, Portugal)

  • Anunciacao Pedro Fernandes

    (CICE-ESCE/IPS (Research Centre in Business Sciences) - Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal)

Abstract

Research purpose. The European Union recognizes the importance of information systems for improving the performance of trans-European transport network ports by promoting a set of initiatives focused on their use. The Directive 2010/65/EU obliges the provision of electronic services for the reception and treatment of declaratory acts necessary for the entry and exit of ships into the European Community and opens the way for future harmonization in the European Union of such services. The research purpose is to analyze and assess the degree of adequacy of European seaport information systems relative to the requirements of the European Directive to the availability of electronic services. Are they complying with the directive?Design / Methodology / Approach. The objective of the study was to characterize the current situation of the main European seaports regarding the impacts of the European Directive. In this sense, it was decided to construct a survey to facilitate the identification and characterization of the options and actions taken by each country regarding the implementation of the Directive 2010/65/UE. This study was attended by the main EU Members and Norway.Findings. From the analysis of the results of the European survey on the implementation of the Directive, we can conclude that the implementation of the Directive is carried out by entities of the State sphere. Member States show a low priority to the exchange of information between the Member States and the majority has not taken any action in this direction. With respect to the Single Window development model, the mixed model is the one adopted in most Member States.Originality / Value / Practical implications. The central objective of Directive 2010/65/EU is to simplify and harmonize the administrative procedures required for maritime transport through electronic means. This Directive is seen as an opportunity to facilitate trade and administrative barriers through harmonization and standardization of the European Seaports Organization. The analysis of directive adoption represents an opportunity to increase scientific knowledge in this economic sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinto Claudio Jose & Anunciacao Pedro Fernandes, 2020. "European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 38-49, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:38-49:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2020-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2020-0019
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2020-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Martinho, 2008. "Port Competition and Hinterland Connections," OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers 2008/19, OECD Publishing.
    2. Marc Lankhorst, 2005. "Enterprise Architecture at Work," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-27505-3, June.
    3. Valentina Carbone & Marcella De Martino, 2003. "The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 305-320, October.
    4. Itf, 2015. "The Impact of Mega-Ships," International Transport Forum Policy Papers 10, OECD Publishing.
    5. Theo Notteboom, 2008. "The Relationship between Seaports and the Inter-Modal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains," OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers 2008/10, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Klopott, 2013. "Restructuring of environmental management in Baltic ports: case of Poland," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 439-450, September.
    2. Haugstetter, Hilary & Cahoon, Stephen, 2010. "Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 30-36.
    3. Francesco Parola & Marcello Risitano & Marco Ferretti & Eva Panetti, 2017. "The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 116-138, January.
    4. Sdoukopoulos, Eleftherios & Boile, Maria, 2020. "Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    5. Sébastien Bourdin & Thomas Cornier, 2015. "From polarization of container traffic to spatial concentration: the example of european & mediterranean ports [De la polarisation du trafic de conteneurs à la concentration spatiale : l'exemple de," Post-Print hal-01473935, HAL.
    6. Cong, Long-ze & Zhang, Dong & Wang, Ming-li & Xu, Hong-feng & Li, Li, 2020. "The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 13-21.
    7. Athanasios A. Pallis & Aimilia A. Papachristou & Charalampos Platias, 2017. "Environmental policies and practices in Cruise Ports: Waste reception facilities in the Med," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(1), pages 54-70, January-M.
    8. Martin, Andrew & Dmitriev, Dmitry & Akeroyd, John, 2010. "A resurgence of interest in Information Architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 6-12.
    9. Anton, Roman, 2014. "Sustainable Intrapreneurship - The GSI Concept and Strategy - Unfolding Competitive Advantage via Fair Entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 69713, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Feb 2015.
    10. Simone CASCHILI & Francesca MEDDA, 2015. "The Port Attractiveness Index:Application On African Ports," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 41, pages 47-82.
    11. Franz Tödtling & Alexander Auer, 2021. "Knowledge bases, innovation and multi-scalar relationships: which kind of territorial boundedness of industrial clusters?," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Nils Grashof (ed.), The Globalization of Regional Clusters, chapter 7, pages 163-188, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. OGREAN Claudia, 2015. "Business Models To Meet The Challenges Of The Global Economy. A Literature Review," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 127-146, December.
    13. Jagan Jeevan & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Alessandro Hill & Jürgen W. Böse, 0. "A decision support system for improved resource planning and truck routing at logistic nodes," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-11.
    15. Amanda Mackloet, 2006. "Locational Dynamics in an Era of Global Economic Change: Is the Port of Rotterdam Up to the Challenge?," ERSA conference papers ersa06p337, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Weihua Liu & Xinran Shen & Di Wang, 2020. "The impacts of dual overconfidence behavior and demand updating on the decisions of port service supply chain: a real case study from China," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 565-604, August.
    17. Yuen, Andrew Chi-lok & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2013. "Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 220-231.
    18. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    19. Berle, Øyvind & Asbjørnslett, Bjørn Egil & Rice, James B., 2011. "Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 696-705.
    20. Ma³gorzata Pankowska, 2012. "Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(38), pages 167-183.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Directive 2010/65/UE; Information; Interoperability; Seaports; Maritime transport; Single Window; Port Community System;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:38-49:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.