IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v39y2012i5p1011-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating infant mortality in Colombia: some overdispersion modelling approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Adrián Quintero-Sarmiento
  • Edilberto Cepeda-Cuervo
  • Vicente Núñez-Antón

Abstract

It is common to fit generalized linear models with binomial and Poisson responses, where the data show a variability that is greater than the theoretical variability assumed by the model. This phenomenon, known as overdispersion, may spoil inferences about the model by considering significant parameters associated with variables that have no significant effect on the dependent variable. This paper explains some methods to detect overdispersion and presents and evaluates three well-known methodologies that have shown their usefulness in correcting this problem, using random mean models, quasi-likelihood methods and a double exponential family. In addition, it proposes some new Bayesian model extensions that have proved their usefulness in correcting the overdispersion problem. Finally, using the information provided by the National Demographic and Health Survey 2005, the departmental factors that have an influence on the mortality of children under 5 years and female postnatal period screening are determined. Based on the results, extensions that generalize some of the aforementioned models are also proposed, and their use is motivated by the data set under study. The results conclude that the proposed overdispersion models provide a better statistical fit of the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrián Quintero-Sarmiento & Edilberto Cepeda-Cuervo & Vicente Núñez-Antón, 2012. "Estimating infant mortality in Colombia: some overdispersion modelling approaches," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 1011-1036, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:5:p:1011-1036
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2011.634395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2011.634395
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2011.634395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray Aitkin, 1999. "A General Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Variance Components in Generalized Linear Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 117-128, March.
    2. Hinde, John & Demetrio, Clarice G. B., 1998. "Overdispersion: Models and estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 151-170, April.
    3. J. K. Lindsey, 1999. "On the use of corrections for overdispersion," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 48(4), pages 553-561.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rigby, R.A. & Stasinopoulos, D.M. & Akantziliotou, C., 2008. "A framework for modelling overdispersed count data, including the Poisson-shifted generalized inverse Gaussian distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 381-393, December.
    2. Hartzel, Jonathan & Liu, I-Ming & Agresti, Alan, 2001. "Describing heterogeneous effects in stratified ordinal contingency tables, with application to multi-center clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 429-449, February.
    3. Maria Iannario, 2015. "Detecting latent components in ordinal data with overdispersion by means of a mixture distribution," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 977-987, May.
    4. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    5. Tony Vangeneugden & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke & Clarice G.B. Dem�trio, 2011. "Marginal correlation from an extended random-effects model for repeated and overdispersed counts," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 215-232, September.
    6. Brian Francis & Jiayi Liu, 2015. "Modelling escalation in crime seriousness: a latent variable approach," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 277-297, August.
    7. Zhang, Daowen & Davidian, Marie, 2004. "Likelihood and conditional likelihood inference for generalized additive mixed models for clustered data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 90-106, October.
    8. Frangos, Nikolaos & Karlis, Dimitris, 2004. "Modelling losses using an exponential-inverse Gaussian distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 53-67, August.
    9. Jeonghwan Kim & Woojoo Lee, 2019. "On testing the hidden heterogeneity in negative binomial regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 457-470, May.
    10. William H. Greene & David A. Hensher, 2008. "Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer and Recent Developments," Working Papers 08-26, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    11. Getachew A. Dagne, 2016. "A growth mixture Tobit model: application to AIDS studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 1174-1185, July.
    12. Victor Chernozhukov & Ivan Fernandez-Val & Jinyong Hahn & Whitney K. Newey, 2008. "Identification and estimation of marginal effects in nonlinear panel models," CeMMAP working papers CWP25/08, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Errington Adam & Einbeck Jochen & Cumming Jonathan & Rössler Ute & Endesfelder David, 2022. "The effect of data aggregation on dispersion estimates in count data models," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 183-202, May.
    14. Mark S. Pearce & Heather O. Dickinson & Murray Aitkin & Louise Parker, 2002. "Still‐births among the offspring of male radiation workers at the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant: detailed results and statistical aspects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(3), pages 523-548, October.
    15. Marino, Maria Francesca & Alfó, Marco, 2016. "Gaussian quadrature approximations in mixed hidden Markov models for longitudinal data: A simulation study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 193-209.
    16. Suzanne J Carroll & Michael J Dale & Theophile Niyonsenga & Anne W Taylor & Mark Daniel, 2020. "Associations between area socioeconomic status, individual mental health, physical activity, diet and change in cardiometabolic risk amongst a cohort of Australian adults: A longitudinal path analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Francesco BARTOLUCCI & Silvia BACCI & Claudia PIGINI, 2015. "A Misspecification Test for Finite-Mixture Logistic Models for Clustered Binary and Ordered Responses," Working Papers 410, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    18. Mabel Morales-Otero & Vicente Núñez-Antón, 2021. "Comparing Bayesian Spatial Conditional Overdispersion and the Besag–York–Mollié Models: Application to Infant Mortality Rates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-33, January.
    19. Sylvia Richardson & Laurent Leblond & Isabelle Jaussent & Peter J. Green, 2002. "Mixture models in measurement error problems, with reference to epidemiological studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(3), pages 549-566, October.
    20. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert & Iddi, Samuel & Demétrio, Clarice G.B., 2012. "A combined beta and normal random-effects model for repeated, overdispersed binary and binomial data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 94-109.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:39:y:2012:i:5:p:1011-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.