IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v19y2013i2p100-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reciprocity in Caring Labor: Nurses’ Work in Residential Aged Care in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie Adams
  • Rhonda Sharp

Abstract

Feminist economists identify reciprocity as a motivation for both paid and unpaid caring work. In general, reciprocity describes people responding to each other in similar ways, either benevolently or harmfully. The quality of care is potentially increased when care relationships are motivated by positive and generalized forms of reciprocity and decreased with negative forms of reciprocity. This study draws on nursing literature and two qualitative studies in Australian residential aged care facilities, conducted in 2002--3 and 2009, to identify a new form called “professional reciprocity.” This form of reciprocity involves deliberate and skilled relational work by nurses to facilitate mutual and interdependent exchanges with care recipients that are beneficial to both care recipients and nurses. This study argues that professional reciprocity, as a skill that can be taught, is important for achieving quality care and workers’ job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie Adams & Rhonda Sharp, 2013. "Reciprocity in Caring Labor: Nurses’ Work in Residential Aged Care in Australia," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 100-121, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:19:y:2013:i:2:p:100-121
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2013.767982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2013.767982
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2013.767982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Bowles & Herbert Gintis, 2000. "The Evolution of Reciprocal Preferences," Working Papers 00-12-072, Santa Fe Institute.
    2. Folbre, Nancy, 2009. "Greed, Lust and Gender: A History of Economic Ideas," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199238422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Fedele, 2018. "Well‐paid nurses are good nurses," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 663-674, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica L. Cohen & William T. Dickens, 2002. "A Foundation for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 335-338, May.
    2. Trofimov, Ivan D. & Baawi, Nurulhana A., 2020. "Human Capital: State of the Field and Ways to Extend the Concept," MPRA Paper 107039, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Rajiv Sethi & E. Somanathan, 2001. "Norm Compliance and Strong Reciprocity," Working Papers 01-09-048, Santa Fe Institute.
    4. Linda Scott & Catherine Dolan & Mary Johnstone–Louis & Kimberly Sugden & Maryalice Wu, 2012. "Enterprise and Inequality: A Study of Avon in South Africa," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(3), pages 543-568, May.
    5. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/19qbbbrfem9ji8u1n0us4j77gf is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Rosemarie Fike, 2023. "Do disruptions to the market process corrupt our morals?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 99-106, March.
    7. Pauline Cullen & Mary P. Murphy, 2018. "Leading the debate for the business case for gender equality, perilous for whom?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 110-126, March.
    8. Wei-Bin ZHANG, 2014. "Gender Discrimination, Education and Economic Growth in a Generalized Uzawa-Lucas Two-Sector Model," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 1-34.
    9. Michelle Cera & Golda Kaplan & Kathleen Gerson & Barbara Risman, 2024. "A Case of Sticky Gender? Persistence and Change in the Division of Household Labor during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Daniela Donnini Macciò, 2015. "G.E. Moore's philosophy and Cambridge economics: Ralph Hawtrey on ethics and methodology," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 163-197, April.
    11. Kyla Sankey & Ronaldo Munck, 2016. "Rethinking Development in Latin America: The Search for Alternative Paths in the Twenty-first Century," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 334-361, December.
    12. Alison Bashford, 2022. "Malthus and gender," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 198-210, November.
    13. Sarah F. Small, 2023. "Infusing Diversity in a History of Economic Thought Course: An Archival Study of Syllabi and Resources for Redesign," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 276-311, June.
    14. Altman, Morris, 2014. "Insights from behavioral economics on how labor markets work," Working Paper Series 3466, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    15. Altman, Morris, 2014. "Insights from behavioral economics on how labor markets work," Working Paper Series 18843, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/19qbbbrfem9ji8u1n0us4j77gf is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Zhang W.B., 2015. "Birth And Mortality Rates, Gender Division Of Labor, And Time Distribution In The Solow Growth Model," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 24(1), pages 121-134.
    18. Bergstrom, Ted, 2001. "Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection Models," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt2bh2x16r, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    19. Costas Panayotakis, 2021. "Beyond the Capitalist Workplace," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 53(1), pages 77-94, March.
    20. Sara Cantillon, 2016. "The Political Economy Landscape," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 485-493, September.
    21. Hélène Périvier, 2012. "Travaillez ou mariez-vous ! : La régulation sexuée de la pauvreté en France et aux États-Unis," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03418028, HAL.
    22. Rai, Shirin M. & Brown, Benjamin D. & Ruwanpura, Kanchana N., 2019. "SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 368-380.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:19:y:2013:i:2:p:100-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.