IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i8p1316-1333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outsmarting geography: implementing territorial innovation strategies in sparsely populated regions

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Dubois
  • Iryna Kristensen
  • Jukka Teräs

Abstract

The smart specialization literature has hardly addressed the role of geography in promoting novel approaches to local and regional innovation processes beyond classic clustering approaches. Based on empirical observations from five sparsely populated regions, the present article proposes original insights that contribute to the theoretical debate on the place-based nature and spatial dimension of entrepreneurial discovery, the key functional mechanism behind smart specialization. First, it advocates the added-value of integrating strategic spatial planning approaches at different stages of smart specialization implementation, from design to operationalization. Second, it suggests that more effective ways of creating domains through shared knowledge bases of existing sectors should aim at promoting collaboration between second-tier economic agents. Finally, the specificity of the territorial preconditions found in sparsely populated regions brings to the fore new forms of proximity relations based on institutional, cognitive and organizational proximity rather than on geographical clustering.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Dubois & Iryna Kristensen & Jukka Teräs, 2017. "Outsmarting geography: implementing territorial innovation strategies in sparsely populated regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 1316-1333, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:8:p:1316-1333
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1320355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2017.1320355
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2017.1320355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Foray & Xabier Goenaga, 2013. "The goals of Smart Specialisation," JRC Research Reports JRC82213, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fil Kristensen, Iryna & Pugh, Rhiannon & Grillitsch, Markus, 2022. "Leadership and governance challenges in delivering place-based transformation through smart specialisation: Insights and policy implications from a metropolitan innovation leader region," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/6, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Sofia R. Silva & Carla S. E. Marques & Anderson R. Galvão, 2024. "Where Is the Rural Creative Class? A Systematic Literature Review About Creative Industries in Low-Density Areas," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6026-6056, June.
    3. Jukka Teras & Viktor Salenius & Laura Fagerlund & Lina Stanionyte, 2018. "Smart Specialisation in Sparsely Populated European Arctic Regions," JRC Research Reports JRC114273, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Ian Merrell & Frances Rowe & Paul Cowie & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2021. "‘Honey pot’ rural enterprise hubs as micro-clusters: Exploring their role in creativity-led rural development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 589-605, November.
    5. Christopher Meyer, 2024. "An Actor-Network Theory conceptualization for smart specialization strategies (S3): creative brokerage towards sustainability transition," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(4), pages 368-386, June.
    6. Hanna Godlewska-Majkowska & Agnieszka Komor, 2020. "The Role of Intelligent Organisations in Creating Favourable Conditions for the Development of Entrepreneurship," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 897-922.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    2. Panagiotis KOUDOUMAKIS & George BOTZORIS & Angelos PROTOPAPAS, 2021. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy To The Development And Convergence Of The Regions Of The European Union," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 277-290, June.
    3. Peter Mayerhofer & Julia Bachtrögler-Unger & Klaus Nowotny & Gerhard Streicher, 2021. "Ökonomische Wirkung von Interventionen der Europäischen Struktur- und Investitionsfonds in Österreich seit 1995," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 94(2), pages 139-150, February.
    4. Krzysztof Mieszkowski & Marcin Kardas, 2015. "Facilitating an Entrepreneurial Discovery Process for Smart Specialisation. The Case of Poland," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 357-384, June.
    5. Martine Gadille & Alena Siarheyeva, 2014. "Limits to the construction of a community-based open innovation network and implications for specialisation of a small urban area," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 152-172.
    6. Moodysson , Jerker & Trippl, Michaela & Zukauskaite, Elena, 2015. "Policy Learning and Smart Specialization Balancing Policy Change and Policy Stability for New Regional Industrial Path Development," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Pietro Moncada-Paterno-Castello & Alex Coad & Antonio Vezzani, 2018. "For a transformative Industry & Innovation Strategy," JRC Research Reports JRC110888, Joint Research Centre.
    8. László Szerb & Raquel Ortega‐Argilés & Zoltan J. Acs & Éva Komlósi, 2020. "Optimizing entrepreneurial development processes for smart specialization in the European Union," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1413-1457, October.
    9. Trippl, Michaela & Asheim, Björn & Miorner, Johan, 2015. "Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    10. Bednarczyk Gabriel & Trzmielak Dariusz M., 2022. "The innovative potential of scientific and research units in the process of entrepreneurial discovery — examples from selected eu regions," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 46(4), pages 115-136, December.
    11. Mathieu Doussineau & Christian Saublens & Nicholas Harrap, 2021. "An intervention-logic approach for the design and implementation of S3 strategies: from place-based assets to expected impacts," JRC Research Reports JRC121110, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Ilaria Giada Anversa & Gianmarco Cantafio & Pasquale Pizzimenti, 2019. "Local Clusters as “Building Blocks” for Smart Specialization Strategies: A Dynamic SWOT Analysis Application in the Case of San Diego (US)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Cristina GANESCU & Cristina SERBANICA & Sebastian ENE & Iuliana TALMACIU, 2019. "Innovation Clusters, Tools To Promote And Support Regional Smart Specialization," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 7-18, May.
    14. Petrović, Tena & Račić, Domagoj & Sigur, Zrinka Glavaš, 2018. "The Benefits and Limitations of Triple-Helix Collaboration: The Case of Zagreb," 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disruptive Change (Dubrovnik, 2018), in: 6th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. New Business Models and Institutional Entrepreneurs: Leading Disrupt, pages 33-48, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb.
    15. Tivadar Mahr & Zoltan Birkner & Nora Rodek Berkes, 2018. "Soundness and Sustainability Research in the Regional and Settlement Development Programmes (2014-2020)," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(2), pages 289-301.
    16. Philippe Lefebvre, 2017. "Les Stratégies Régionales d’Innovation de « spécialisation intelligente » en Europe (Smart Specialization Strategies) : Dynamiques territoriales endogènes et institutions exogènes," Working Papers hal-01494814, HAL.
    17. Marcin Kardas, 2016. "Agri-Food Industry as Priority in Smart Specialization Strategies in EU Member States (Sektor rolno-spozywczy jako priorytet w strategiach inteligentnych specjalizacji panstw Unii Europejskiej)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(22), pages 33-47.
    18. Fabrizio, Kira R. & Poczter, Sharon & Zelner, Bennet A., 2017. "Does innovation policy attract international competition? Evidence from energy storage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1106-1117.
    19. Matjaz Vidmar, 2019. "The Ten Million Euro Question: How Do Innovation Intermediaries Support Smart Specialization?," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 21(2), pages 37-84, December.
    20. Evgeny N. Starikov & Marina V. Evseeva & Ilya V. Naumov, 2022. "Industrial growth and specialisation: The impact of the government support tools," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 86-108, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:8:p:1316-1333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.