IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v5y2018i3p480-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance analysis of factors enhancing coaching interactions in organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Angelina Rosha

    (Riga Technical University, Latvia)

  • Natalja Lace

    (Riga Technical University, Latvia)

Abstract

The article discusses the factors that are expected to enhance coaching interactions and reports the survey findings on the relevance of external and internal conditions to enhance coaching interactions in organizations. A particular focus of the literature review is to explore the factors ensuring a successful coaching interaction in organization. These characteristics are recognized as important predictors of coaching effectiveness. A questionnaire is designed to investigate the relevance of conditions that are likely to enhance coaching interactions in organisations. A list of conditions generally extracted from the literature review include external indirect conditions, external direct conditions, internal conditions at the level of organisation, internal conditions at the level of groups and internal conditions at individual (client’s) level. The external indirect conditions comprise the reference to coaching in the context of EU documents. The external direct conditions are focused on the conditions that are expected to ensure the quality of service delivery. Internal conditions at the level of organisation are related to the features of organisational culture. The conditions at the level of groups have collaborative focus. Internal conditions at individual level are focused on the client. The survey was conducted from December 2014 to August 2015. Respondents were targeted from two groups: those who provide coaching service and those who receive this service. 75 coaches and coaching clients from Latvia and Lithuania took part in the survey. The obtained data is analyzed by using SPSS and conducting correspondence analysis to extract the most important factors. The analysis reveals the key factors under five categories that might be important in enhancing coaching interactions in organizations. The results obtained in the study are compared with the findings of theoretical and empirical literature review. The findings of the study are important for the further research in the field of organizational coaching to investigate the impact of factors on coaching delivery throughout organizational life cycle. Limitations. The data obtained by using correspondence analysis can only be interpreted to make a general statement about the trends. The study is based on a limited number of respondents and therefore has certain statistic limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelina Rosha & Natalja Lace, 2018. "Relevance analysis of factors enhancing coaching interactions in organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 480-492, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:480-492
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(5)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/19/Rosha_Relevance_analysis_of_factors_enhancing_coaching_interactions_in_organizations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/161
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(5)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna Kelley & Heidi M. Neck & Gina Colarelli O'Connor & Albert Paulson, 2005. "Corporate Entrepreneurship Through Radical Innovation: Key Organization and Initiative Level Mechanisms," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Tom Elfring (ed.), Corporate Entrepreneurship and Venturing, chapter 2, pages 23-48, Springer.
    2. Josée Audet & Paul Couteret, 2012. "Coaching the entrepreneur: features and success factors," Post-Print hal-03540503, HAL.
    3. Josée Audet & Paul Couteret, 2012. "Coaching the Entrepreneur: Features and Success Factors," Post-Print hal-01380817, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelina Rosha & Natalja Lace, 2018. "Relevance analysis of factors enhancing coaching interactions in organizations," Post-Print hal-01773580, HAL.
    2. Jean C. Kouam & Simplice A. Asongu, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Working Papers 22/046, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    3. Omonigho Simon Umukoro & David Efevogho Okurame, 2017. "Exogenous determinants of entrepreneurial intuition and the mediatory role of psychological capital among potential youth entrepreneurs," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Popescul Lorena Florentina, 2017. "The Impact of Life Coaching Sessions on the Behavior of Future Romanian Entrepreneurs - Pilot Study," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 449-454, December.
    5. Bijedić, Teita & Schröder, Christian & Werner, Arndt & Chen, Xiangyu, 2023. "How do working conditions, network relationships, and institutional support offers effect entrepreneurial intentions of German university scientists?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. Lefterius Kalonga Mwamba & Astridah Musonda – PhD & Harrison Daka – PhD & Rosemary Muma Mulenga – PhD, 2021. "Strategies for Enhancing Mentorship in Entrepreneurship: A Case Study of Undergraduate Students of Kwame Nkrumah University, Kabwe-Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 478-487, September.
    7. Angelina Roša (Rosha) & Natalja Lace, 2018. "The Open Innovation Model of Coaching Interaction in Organisations for Sustainable Performance within the Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Michael P. Ciuchta & Chaim Letwin & Regan Stevenson & Sean McMahon & M. Nesij Huvaj, 2018. "Betting on the Coachable Entrepreneur: Signaling and Social Exchange in Entrepreneurial Pitches," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(6), pages 860-885, November.
    9. METË Beqiraj, 2015. "The Role Corporate Governance in Foreign Direkt Investment in Kosovo," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, May - Aug.
    10. Mansoori, Yashar & Karlsson, Tomas & Lundqvist, Mats, 2019. "The influence of the lean startup methodology on entrepreneur-coach relationships in the context of a startup accelerator," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 84, pages 37-47.
    11. Andrew C. Corbett & Heidi M. Neck & Dawn R. DeTienne, 2007. "How Corporate Entrepreneurs Learn from Fledgling Innovation Initiatives: Cognition and the Development of a Termination Script," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(6), pages 829-852, November.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5648 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    coaching interactions; relevance analysis; correspondence analysis; organizational performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:480-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.