IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v31y2017i11d10.1007_s11269-017-1688-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Stage Multi-Water Sources Allocation Model in Regional Water Resources Management under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Liu

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

  • Wenting Liu

    (Ministry of Water Resources)

  • Qiang Fu

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

  • Yongjia Zhang

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

  • Tianxiao Li

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

  • Khan M. Imran

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

  • Faiz M. Abrar

    (Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University
    Northeast Agricultural University)

Abstract

Water shortages are common in society, and the effective allocation of limited water resources to each competitive sector has become one of the urgent concerns for water resource managers. With the increasing conflict between supply and demand of water resources, the problem of optimized allocation has attracted considerable attention. In this paper, regarding the Hongxinglong Administration of Heilongjiang Agricultural Reclamation in Sanjiang Plain, China as the study area, a two-stage regional multi-water source allocation (TRMSA) model is introduced to determine the characteristics of water supply sources, which consist of surface water, groundwater and transit water. When water resources managers periodically make different decisions over time, the TRMSA model can express the uncertain problem of water resources allocation as probability distributions and solve these problems effectively. Using this model, the optimized water supply target and shortage with different inflow levels in three sectors, namely, domestic, agriculture and industry, are analyzed for a dry year, and the optimized water allocation can be determined from the water allocation demands in these sectors. In addition, the satisfaction of supply targets in each sector in normal and high years as well as the recognition of the decision variables and different scenarios in this model are also discussed. Thus, water resource managers can obtain variable optimized water allocation schemes according to different water requirements, and decision makers can make practical judgments through multiple choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Liu & Wenting Liu & Qiang Fu & Yongjia Zhang & Tianxiao Li & Khan M. Imran & Faiz M. Abrar, 2017. "Two-Stage Multi-Water Sources Allocation Model in Regional Water Resources Management under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3607-3625, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1688-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1688-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-017-1688-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-017-1688-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Zhang & C. Li, 2014. "An Inexact Two-Stage Water Resources Allocation Model for Sustainable Development and Management Under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(10), pages 3161-3178, August.
    2. Chang, Ni-Bin & Wang, S.F., 1997. "A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 303-321, June.
    3. Yong Li & Guo Huang, 2008. "Interval-parameter Two-stage Stochastic Nonlinear Programming for Water Resources Management under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(6), pages 681-698, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Z. Ghaffari Moghadam & E. Moradi & M. Hashemi Tabar & A. Sardar Shahraki, 2023. "Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5663-5689, June.
    2. Dan Yan & Mingtian Yao & Fulco Ludwig & Pavel Kabat & He Qing Huang & Ronald W. A. Hutjes & Saskia E. Werners, 2018. "Exploring Future Water Shortage for Large River Basins under Different Water Allocation Strategies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(9), pages 3071-3086, July.
    3. Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Chenglong & Yan, Zehao & Guo, Shanshan & Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Ping, 2018. "An interval nonlinear multiobjective programming model with fuzzy-interval credibility constraint for crop monthly water allocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 123-133.
    4. Zhang, Yu & Ren, Chongfeng & Zhang, Hongbo & Xie, Zhishuai & Wang, Yashi, 2022. "Managing irrigation water resources with economic benefit and energy consumption: an interval linear multi-objective fractional optimization model under multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Ijaz Ahmad & Fan Zhang & Junguo Liu & Muhammad Naveed Anjum & Muhammad Zaman & Muhammad Tayyab & Muhammad Waseem & Hafiz Umar Farid, 2018. "A linear bi-level multi-objective program for optimal allocation of water resources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahdi Zarghami & Nasim Safari & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Shafiqul Islam, 2015. "Nonlinear Interval Parameter Programming Combined with Cooperative Games: a Tool for Addressing Uncertainty in Water Allocation Using Water Diplomacy Framework," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4285-4303, September.
    2. Chen, C. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2016. "Interval-fuzzy municipal-scale energy model for identification of optimal strategies for energy management – A case study of Tianjin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1161-1177.
    3. Qiang Fu & Tianxiao Li & Song Cui & Dong Liu & Xueping Lu, 2018. "Agricultural Multi-Water Source Allocation Model Based on Interval Two-Stage Stochastic Robust Programming under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(4), pages 1261-1274, March.
    4. C. Li & L. Zhang, 2015. "An Inexact Two-Stage Allocation Model for Water Resources Management Under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(6), pages 1823-1841, April.
    5. S A Gabriel & P Sahakij & M Ramirez & C Peot, 2007. "A multiobjective optimization model for processing and distributing biosolids to reuse fields," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 850-864, July.
    6. Chunlong Li & Jianzhong Zhou & Shuo Ouyang & Chao Wang & Yi Liu, 2015. "Water Resources Optimal Allocation Based on Large-scale Reservoirs in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2171-2187, May.
    7. Aouni, Belaid & Kettani, Ossama, 2001. "Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 225-231, January.
    8. Prawat Sahakij & Steven Gabriel & Mark Ramirez & Chris Peot, 2011. "Multi-objective Optimization Models for Distributing Biosolids to Reuse Fields: A Case Study for the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    9. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    10. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    11. Senay Oguztimur, 2011. "Why Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach For Transport Problems?," ERSA conference papers ersa11p438, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Maryam Ghashghaie & Safar Marofi & Hossein Marofi, 2014. "Using System Dynamics Method to Determine the Effect of Water Demand Priorities on Downstream Flow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(14), pages 5055-5072, November.
    13. C. Dai & Y. Cai & Y. Liu & W. Wang & H. Guo, 2015. "A Generalized Interval Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Programming Method for Domestic Wastewater Management Under Uncertainty – A Case Study of Kunming, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(9), pages 3015-3036, July.
    14. Mehran Homayounfar & Arman Ganji & C. Martinez, 2011. "A Novel Solution for Stochastic Dynamic Game of Water Allocation from a Reservoir Using Collocation Method," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(13), pages 3427-3444, October.
    15. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2016. "Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 76-88.
    16. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Wang, G.Q. & Huang, Y.F., 2009. "FSWM: A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic water-management model for agricultural sustainability under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1807-1818, December.
    17. Di Corato, Luca & Montinari, Natalia, 2014. "Flexible waste management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 174-185.
    18. Li, W. & Li, Y.P. & Li, C.H. & Huang, G.H., 2010. "An inexact two-stage water management model for planning agricultural irrigation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1905-1914, November.
    19. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Yang, Z.F. & Nie, S.L., 2008. "IFMP: Interval-fuzzy multistage programming for water resources management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 800-812.
    20. Chen, Chang-Chih & Shyu, So-De & Wu, Yen-Chun & Yang, Chih-Yuan, 2011. "A waste management model for optimal recycling-landfilling policies under macroeconomic conditions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 852-858, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:31:y:2017:i:11:d:10.1007_s11269-017-1688-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.