IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i6d10.1007_s10668-022-02658-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market

Author

Listed:
  • Z. Ghaffari Moghadam

    (Research Institute of Zabol)

  • E. Moradi

    (University of Sistan and Baluchestan)

  • M. Hashemi Tabar

    (University of Sistan and Baluchestan)

  • A. Sardar Shahraki

    (University of Sistan and Baluchestan)

Abstract

The issue of water resource management in the Sistan region has been complicated by water fluctuations of the Hirmand River in recent years. The decrease in the water flowing toward Sistan and followed by continuous droughts has caused a severe water crisis in this region. The critical situation of water resources in the Sistan region has faced a serious problem in the process of sustainable development in this region. Consequently, it has become more imperative to adopt effective approaches for optimal and efficient management of water, especially in the agricultural sector as it is the biggest water consumer in the Sistan region. This research focused on the optimal allocation of water to the agricultural sector with an emphasis on the water market by integrating the Stackelberg–Nash–Cournot equilibrium model and Nerlove’s supply model. The Stackelberg–Nash–Cournot equilibrium game was run with a metaheuristic algorithm composed of a dynamic genetic algorithm and a fuzzy programming method. Also, to cope with the challenges, tackle the future uncertainty, and provide more information for the adjustment of the agricultural irrigation pattern, the scenario-building technique was applied in which two parameters of irrigation coefficient and the amount of water allocated to the agricultural sector were changed. The results showed that the Hirmand 2 region has been allocated with the highest amount of water. The lowest amount of water is allocated to wheat and barley due to their low return, whereas the highest amount of water is allocated to onion and melon production. By creating a water market, the economic profit increases by 20,013 million IRR, and the inequity in water allocation changes by 0.02. The results of modeling the scenario of different irrigation coefficients and water allocated show that the economic profit increases to 695,152 and 6,109,136 million IRR when the irrigation coefficient increases to 50% and 70%, it increases to 474,550 million IRR when the amount of water allocated is increased, and it decreases to 834,946 million IRR when the amount of water allocated is decreased. The comparison of the allocation with and without a water market shows the significance and effectiveness of the water market. Accordingly, the establishment of a regional water market in the Sistan region not only changes the water allocated to the crops in the studied regions and the profit of the cropping pattern but also improves the income of the farmers and contributes to equity in water allocation among the regions. Also, the water market contributes to reducing the amount of water allocated per unit of economic profit. Given the supportive and constructive role of local and regional water markets, it is recommended to lay the ground for establishing this mechanism and optimally using it. In order to overcome the lack of water among crops and gain more economic profit, it is possible to implement the scenario of increasing irrigation efficiency using modern irrigation systems. According to the results of water allocation between regions and agricultural crops, it is suggested that low-yield crops such as wheat and barley have been removed from the cultivation pattern and replaced by high-yield crops such as onions, melons and alfalfa.

Suggested Citation

  • Z. Ghaffari Moghadam & E. Moradi & M. Hashemi Tabar & A. Sardar Shahraki, 2023. "Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5663-5689, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02658-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02658-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02658-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02658-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pengfei Lin & Jinjun You & Hong Gan & Ling Jia, 2020. "Rule-Based Object-Oriented Water Resource System Simulation Model for Water Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3183-3197, August.
    2. Marc Nerlove, 1956. "Estimates of the Elasticities of Supply of Selected Agricultural Commodities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 496-509.
    3. Mehdi Kazemi & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour & Xuefeng Chu, 2022. "Optimal water resources allocation in transboundary river basins according to hydropolitical consideration," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1188-1206, January.
    4. Jingchun Feng & YunQing Tang & Song Xue & Ke Zhang, 2022. "Study on cooperative strategies of rural water environment governance PPP project between companies and farmers from the perspective of evolutionary game," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 138-155, January.
    5. Tiangui Lv & Hualin Xie & Hua Lu & Xinmin Zhang & Lei Yang, 2019. "A Game Theory-Based Approach for Exploring Water Resource Exploitation Behavior in the Poyang Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Mojtaba Sadegh & Najmeh Mahjouri & Reza Kerachian, 2010. "Optimal Inter-Basin Water Allocation Using Crisp and Fuzzy Shapley Games," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2291-2310, August.
    7. Yue, Qiong & Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Chenglong & Zhu, Hua & Tang, Yikuan & Guo, Ping, 2020. "A full fuzzy-interval credibility-constrained nonlinear programming approach for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    8. J. Alarcón & L. Juana, 2016. "The Water Markets as Effective Tools of Managing Water Shortages in an Irrigation District," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2611-2625, June.
    9. Elleuch, Mohamed Ali & Anane, Makram & Euchi, Jalel & Frikha, Ahmed, 2019. "Hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making to solve the irrigation water allocation problem in the Tunisian case," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Al-Jamal, M. S. & Ball, S. & Sammis, T. W., 2001. "Comparison of sprinkler, trickle and furrow irrigation efficiencies for onion production," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 253-266, January.
    11. Amir AghaKouchak & David Feldman & Martin Hoerling & Travis Huxman & Jay Lund, 2015. "Water and climate: Recognize anthropogenic drought," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7566), pages 409-411, August.
    12. Shiqi Fang & Ping Guo & Mo Li & Liudong Zhang, 2013. "Bilevel Multiobjective Programming Applied to Water Resources Allocation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-9, March.
    13. Dong Liu & Wenting Liu & Qiang Fu & Yongjia Zhang & Tianxiao Li & Khan M. Imran & Faiz M. Abrar, 2017. "Two-Stage Multi-Water Sources Allocation Model in Regional Water Resources Management under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3607-3625, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad S. Khorshidi & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Mojtaba Sadegh & Banafsheh Nematollahi, 2019. "A Multi-Objective Risk-Based Game Theoretic Approach to Reservoir Operation Policy in Potential Future Drought Condition," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(6), pages 1999-2014, April.
    2. Shannak, Sa'd, 2022. "Optimizing dynamics of water-energy-food nexus in a desert climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Gheysari, Mahdi & Mirlatifi, Seyed Majid & Bannayan, Mohammad & Homaee, Mehdi & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2009. "Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 809-821, May.
    4. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    5. Paniagua-Molina, Javier & Solís-Rivera, Luis Ricardo, 2020. "Effect of “Golden Pineapple Innovation” on Costa Rica's Pineapple Exports to U.S. Market: An Econometric Approach," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(3), July.
    6. Russell, Bill & Chowdhury, Rosen Azad, 2013. "Estimating United States Phillips curves with expectations consistent with the statistical process of inflation," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 24-38.
    7. Torok, Steven John, 1982. "International trade in commodities and labor: the case of the importation of Mexican agricultural labor and fresh market winter tomatoes into the US, 1964-1979," ISU General Staff Papers 198201010800008550, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Daeryong Park & Huan-Jung Fan & Jun-Jie Zhu & Taesoon Kim & Myoung-Jin Um & Siyeon Kim & Seol Jeon & Kichul Jung, 2021. "Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Karner, Katrin & Schmid, Erwin & Schneider, Uwe A. & Mitter, Hermine, 2021. "Computing stochastic Pareto frontiers between economic and environmental goals for a semi-arid agricultural production region in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Wenting Wang & Longbao Wei, 2021. "Impacts of agricultural price support policy on price variability and welfare: Evidence from China's soybean market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(1), pages 3-17, January.
    11. Dushmanitch, V. Y. & Darroch, M. A. G., 1991. "The Impacts Of Monetary Policy On The Maize And Beef Sectors Of South Africa I: Theoretical Foundations And Model Specification," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 30(3), September.
    12. Yizhong Chen & Hongwei Lu & Jing Li & Pengdong Yan & He Peng, 2021. "Multi-Level Decision-Making for Inter-Regional Water Resources Management with Water Footprint Analysis and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(2), pages 481-503, January.
    13. Jiarong Qian & Shoichi Ito & Zhijun Zhao, 2020. "The effect of price support policies on food security and farmers’ income in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1328-1349, October.
    14. Lee, Seung Oh & Jung, Younghun, 2018. "Efficiency of water use and its implications for a water-food nexus in the Aral Sea Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 80-90.
    15. Mohammad Nikoo & Reza Kerachian & Hamed Poorsepahy-Samian, 2012. "An Interval Parameter Model for Cooperative Inter-Basin Water Resources Allocation Considering the Water Quality Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(11), pages 3329-3343, September.
    16. Mekbib G. Haile & Matthias Kalkuhl & Joachim Braun, 2014. "Inter- and intra-seasonal crop acreage response to international food prices and implications of volatility," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(6), pages 693-710, November.
    17. Yong Peng & Jinggang Chu & Anbang Peng & Huicheng Zhou, 2015. "Optimization Operation Model Coupled with Improving Water-Transfer Rules and Hedging Rules for Inter-Basin Water Transfer-Supply Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3787-3806, August.
    18. Skold, Karl Durwood, 1989. "The integration of alternative information systems: an application to the Hogs and Pigs report," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010239, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Mohammad Delpasand & Sarvin ZamanZad-Ghavidel & Xuefeng Chu, 2024. "Developing a novel social–water capital index by gene expression programming," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28187-28217, November.
    20. Poitras, Geoffrey, 2023. "Cobweb Theory, Market Stability, And Price Expectations," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 137-161, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02658-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.