IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/trosos/v15y2021i2d10.1007_s12626-021-00090-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Numerical Evaluation of the Incentive Contracts for Japan’s Defense Equipment

Author

Listed:
  • Motohiko Kasai

    (Ministry of Defense, Japan)

  • Naoki Watanabe

    (Keio University)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to numerically evaluate the performance of three schemes in incentive contracts used by the Japan Ministry of Defense for its procurement of defense equipment: Two schemes that had previously been used and one scheme that is currently being used. We formalized the transaction between the Ministry of Defense and a supplier as a principal-agent model and compared the effectiveness of providing an incentive for the supplier to exert effort for its cost reduction to the benefit of the general public in Japan. In a simple numerical study, we specified the probability distribution of the amount of cost reduction per unit and fixed the effort level so that we could interpret whether the supplier chooses to exert effort or not on cost reduction. As a result, it was found that changes in the schemes that have been made did not clearly improve the welfare of the general public and that the incentive scheme currently being used is always the best one among those three schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Motohiko Kasai & Naoki Watanabe, 2021. "A Simple Numerical Evaluation of the Incentive Contracts for Japan’s Defense Equipment," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 575-596, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:trosos:v:15:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12626-021-00090-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12626-021-00090-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12626-021-00090-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12626-021-00090-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rogerson, William P, 1985. "The First-Order Approach to Principal-Agent Problems," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1357-1367, November.
    2. Steven Shavell, 1979. "Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 55-73, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Xie, 2015. "Information, Risk Sharing and Incentives in Agency Problems," Staff Working Papers 15-7, Bank of Canada.
    2. Dirk Yandell, 1988. "Audit Information and Incentives for Efficiency," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 32(1), pages 49-58, March.
    3. Florian Hoffmann & Roman Inderst & Marcus Opp, 2021. "Only Time Will Tell: A Theory of Deferred Compensation [Motivating Innovation in Newly Public Firms]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(3), pages 1253-1278.
    4. Hernández-Santibáñez, Nicolás, 2024. "Principal-Multiagents problem under equivalent changes of measure: General study and an existence result," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Lee, Hangsuck & Lee, Minha & Hong, Jimin, 2022. "Optimal insurance under moral hazard in loss reduction," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Bengt Holmström, 2017. "Pay for Performance and Beyond," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1753-1777, July.
    7. Arup Bose & Debashis Pal & David E. M. Sappington, 2011. "On the Performance of Linear Contracts," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 159-193, March.
    8. Schmidt, Klaus, 2017. "The 2016 Nobel Memorial Prize in Contract Theory," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 19, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    9. Bartsch, Elga, 1996. "Enforcement of environmental liability in the case of uncertain causality and asymmetric information," Kiel Working Papers 755, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Dionne, Georges & Harrington, Scott, 2017. "Insurance and Insurance Markets," Working Papers 17-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    11. Jean-Jacques Laffont, 1987. "Le risque moral dans la relation de mandat," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(1), pages 5-24.
    12. Paul Duetting & Michal Feldman & Inbal Talgam-Cohen, 2024. "Algorithmic Contract Theory: A Survey," Papers 2412.16384, arXiv.org.
    13. Kim, Son Ku & Wang, Susheng, 1998. "Linear Contracts and the Double Moral-Hazard," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 342-378, October.
    14. Chaigneau, Pierre & Edmans, Alex & Gottlieb, Daniel, 2019. "The informativeness principle without the first-order approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 743-755.
    15. Luis Rayo, 2002. "Relational Team Incentives and Ownership," Theory workshop papers 357966000000000087, UCLA Department of Economics.
    16. Florian Hoffmann & Roman Inderst & Marcus Opp, 2022. "The Economics of Deferral and Clawback Requirements," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(4), pages 2423-2470, August.
    17. Radhakrishnan, Suresh & Ronen, Joshua, 1999. "Job challenge as a motivator in a principal-agent setting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 138-157, May.
    18. Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2018. "Moral hazard: Base models and two extensions," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 16, pages 453-485, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Caillaud Bernard & Jullien Bruno, 1991. "Managerial incentives based on insider information," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9128, CEPREMAP.
    20. Rongzhu Ke & Xinyi Xu, 2023. "The existence of an optimal deterministic contract in moral hazard problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(2), pages 375-416, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Defense equipment contract; Principal-agent analysis; Cost reduction; Public welfare; Numerical evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation
    • D86 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Economics of Contract Law
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:trosos:v:15:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12626-021-00090-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.