IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v37y2024i4d10.1007_s11213-023-09648-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Adoption of Soft Systems Methodology, Co-Creation, Enterprise Architecture, and Balanced Scorecard for Continuous Assessment and Improvement of Programmes on Integrated Care for Multimorbid Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Agnes Nakakawa

    (Makerere University)

  • Esteban Manuel Keenoy

    (Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Ane Fullaondo Zabala

    (Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Dolores Verdoy Berastegui

    (Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research)

  • Jon Txarramendieta Suarez

    (Kronikgune Institute for Health Services Research)

Abstract

Although there are several healthcare and Information Technology (IT) practices in Implementing and Managing integrated care for Multimorbid patients (IMM), a synchronized perspective of the existing and emerging practices is still lacking. Our earlier research initiated the adoption of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) to derive a model, that specifies strategic drivers for guiding alignment of healthcare and IT practices in IMM. However, the model does not directly reveal details of how a programme can implement and continuously assess specific healthcare and IT practices in a coherent/integrated way, so as to realize goals and outcomes of IMM. This implies the need to extend the model by providing a mechanism that synchronizes specific elements of healthcare and IT practices, with the strategic goals of delivering integrated care for multimorbid patients. Such a synthesis of best practices in IMM, can serve as Scorecard for Continuous Assessment and improvement of programmes on Integrated Care for multimorbid patients (SAICO). To design SAICO, SSM’s multi-level thinking technique was mutually adopted with Co-Creation, Enterprise Architecture, and Balanced Scorecard approaches. SAICO’s design was enhanced using a Co-Creation by validation approach, that involved 18 co-creators or subject matter experts from Spain and Uganda. Findings from SAICO evaluation affirmed its usefulness and provided insights that improved its design, understandability, and usability. SAICO can be perceived as an evolving reference map of elements/capabilities that shape a programme’s capacity for IMM, because it can be used to conduct continuous self assessment and identify actions for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnes Nakakawa & Esteban Manuel Keenoy & Ane Fullaondo Zabala & Dolores Verdoy Berastegui & Jon Txarramendieta Suarez, 2024. "Mutual Adoption of Soft Systems Methodology, Co-Creation, Enterprise Architecture, and Balanced Scorecard for Continuous Assessment and Improvement of Programmes on Integrated Care for Multimorbid Pat," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 351-386, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-023-09648-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-023-09648-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-023-09648-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-023-09648-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:37:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-023-09648-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.