IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i11p4826-4830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of co-creation perspective in networked collaboration platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Mačiulienė, Monika
  • Skaržauskienė, Aelita

Abstract

This study addresses a specific challenge of non-utilized benefits from the potential of networked structures, design, and technological solutions in collaboration platforms as a source for improving and stimulating internal and external co-creation opportunities. The organization of the collaboration between diverse set of actors in sharing knowledge and resources results in fragmented value co-creation processes of networked platforms (online communities, social networks, networks of practice, etc.). Collaboration platforms may differ in terms of users or purpose, but they all seem to share a number of common characteristics such as mass participation in online interactions, inclusion of information communication technologies (ICT) together with people in knowledge creation and aggregation, etc. The article evaluates the readiness of networked platforms to generate intended co-creation value by conducting a qualitative research on 30 collaboration platforms in Lithuania using a Social Indices calculation methodology (Skaržauskienė & Gudelytė, 2015). The study assesses the platforms with the use of three integrated indicators, namely, capacity for creativity, capacity for aggregating knowledge, and capacity for decision making. The research results provide valuable information on the trends in managing collaboration platforms, distilled best practices, and opened up opportunities for scientific reasoning to design engagement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mačiulienė, Monika & Skaržauskienė, Aelita, 2016. "Evaluation of co-creation perspective in networked collaboration platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4826-4830.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:4826-4830
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296316302016
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Alves, 2013. "Co-creation and innovation in public services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7-8), pages 671-682, May.
    2. Jan Leimeister, 2010. "Collective Intelligence," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(4), pages 245-248, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurt Sandkuhl & Hans-Georg Fill & Stijn Hoppenbrouwers & John Krogstie & Florian Matthes & Andreas Opdahl & Gerhard Schwabe & Ömer Uludag & Robert Winter, 2018. "From Expert Discipline to Common Practice: A Vision and Research Agenda for Extending the Reach of Enterprise Modeling," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(1), pages 69-80, February.
    2. Boone, David, 2016. "New Zealand public service leaders and organisational change inception: A framework for deciding what to change," MBA Research Papers 6137, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Management.
    3. Hui Zhang & Huanhuan Xiong & Jianxin Xu, 2022. "Dynamic Simulation Research on the Effect of Governance Mechanism on Value Co-Creation of Blockchain Industry Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Tim Straub & Henner Gimpel & Florian Teschner & Christof Weinhardt, 2015. "How (not) to Incent Crowd Workers," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(3), pages 167-179, June.
    5. BARCEVICIUS Egidijus & CIBAITE Guonda & CODAGNONE Cristiano & GINEIKYTE Vaida & KLIMAVICIUTE Luka & LIVA Giovanni & MATULEVIC Loreta & MISURACA Gianluca & VANINI Irene, 2019. "Exploring Digital Government transformation in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC118857, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Jaehun Joo & Ismatilla Normatov, 2013. "Determinants of collective intelligence quality: comparison between Wiki and Q&A services in English and Korean users," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 687-711, December.
    7. Alberto Ferraris & Gabriele Santoro & Anna Claudia Pellicelli, 2020. "“Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1259-1280, December.
    8. María José Quero & Rafael Ventura & Carol Kelleher, 2017. "Value-in-context in crowdfunding ecosystems: how context frames value co-creation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 405-425, June.
    9. Martinez-Torres, Rocio & Olmedilla, Maria, 2016. "Identification of innovation solvers in open innovation communities using swarm intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 15-24.
    10. Reinke, Kathleen, 2022. "Ungenutztes Potenzial in der Belegschaft? Die Auswirkungen von digitaler Mitarbeiterbeteiligung [Untapped Potential in the Workforce? The Impact of Digital Employee Participation]," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(1), pages 134-149.
    11. Antonio Botti & Antonella Monda, 2020. "Sustainable Value Co-Creation and Digital Health: The Case of Trentino eHealth Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Lenart-Gansiniec, Regina, 2016. "Importance Of Crowdsourcing In Social Innovations: Evidence From Poland," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(3), pages 1-12.
    13. Monica Cerdan Chiscano, 2021. "Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and the Family Inclusive Airport Design Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Tran Thi Van Trang & Mai Ngoc Khuong, 2023. "The role of risk factors, partner compatibility, organizational creativity and co-creation value on firm performance: evidence from SMEs in Vietnam," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 41(2), pages 449-475.
    15. Detlef Schoder & Johannes Putzke & Panagiotis Metaxas & Peter Gloor & Kai Fischbach, 2014. "Information Systems for “Wicked Problems”," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(1), pages 3-10, February.
    16. Dominik Dellermann & Philipp Ebel & Matthias Söllner & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Hybrid Intelligence," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(5), pages 637-643, October.
    17. Henner Gimpel & Vanessa Graf-Seyfried & Robert Laubacher & Oliver Meindl, 2023. "Towards Artificial Intelligence Augmenting Facilitation: AI Affordances in Macro-Task Crowdsourcing," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 75-124, February.
    18. Secundo, Giustina & Riad Shams, S.M. & Nucci, Francesco, 2021. "Digital technologies and collective intelligence for healthcare ecosystem: Optimizing Internet of Things adoption for pandemic management," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 563-572.
    19. Gabriel Abu-Tayeh & Oliver Neumann & Matthias Stuermer, 2018. "Exploring the Motives of Citizen Reporting Engagement: Self-Concern and Other-Orientation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(3), pages 215-226, June.
    20. Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2022. "Open innovation and prizes: is the European Commission really comitted?," CEPN Working Papers hal-03524203, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:11:p:4826-4830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.