IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v62y2021i2d10.1007_s00362-019-01103-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical likelihood inference in general linear model with missing values in response and covariates by MNAR mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Fayyaz Bahari

    (University of Mohaghegh Ardabil)

  • Safar Parsi

    (University of Mohaghegh Ardabil)

  • Mojtaba Ganjali

    (Shahid Beheshti University)

Abstract

In this paper, we utilize a general linear model for analyzing data with missing values in some covariates and response variable. Our aim is to fit a general linear model and to construct a confidence region for the parameters of the general linear model based on the empirical likelihood ratio function. Also, we assume that missing data may happen in covariates or in response variable or in both of them with missing not at random mechanism where the probability of missing a datum is specified by a logistic model. We use inverse probability weights and an augmented method as the auxiliary condition of empirical likelihood to estimate parameters of the general linear model. Asymptotic properties of the empirical log-likelihood ratio are investigated whether the exponential tilting parameter is known or estimated by the follow-up sample. The asymptotic normality of estimators is also proved. Some simulation studies are used to illustrate the performance of our model for different sample sizes. Also, a real dataset is studied by the proposed methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayyaz Bahari & Safar Parsi & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2021. "Empirical likelihood inference in general linear model with missing values in response and covariates by MNAR mechanism," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 591-622, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-019-01103-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-019-01103-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-019-01103-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-019-01103-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James R. Carpenter & Michael G. Kenward & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2006. "A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(3), pages 571-584, July.
    2. Zhao, Hui & Zhao, Pu-Ying & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2013. "Empirical likelihood inference for mean functionals with nonignorably missing response data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 101-116.
    3. Wang, Suojin & Wang, C. Y., 2001. "A note on kernel assisted estimators in missing covariate regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 439-449, December.
    4. Kim, Jae Kwang & Yu, Cindy Long, 2011. "A Semiparametric Estimation of Mean Functionals With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 157-165.
    5. Weihua Zhao & Riquan Zhang & Yukun Liu & Jicai Liu, 2015. "Empirical likelihood based modal regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 411-430, May.
    6. Minna Genbäck & Elena Stanghellini & Xavier Luna, 2015. "Uncertainty intervals for regression parameters with non-ignorable missingness in the outcome," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 829-847, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fayyaz Bahari & Safar Parsi & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2021. "Goodness of fit test for general linear model with nonignorable missing on response variable," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 105(1), pages 163-196, March.
    2. Creemers, An & Aerts, Marc & Hens, Niel & Molenberghs, Geert, 2012. "A nonparametric approach to weighted estimating equations for regression analysis with missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 100-113, January.
    3. Guo, Xu & Song, Lianlian & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Model checking for general linear regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Zhang, Yan-Qing & Tang, Nian-Sheng, 2017. "Bayesian local influence analysis of general estimating equations with nonignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 184-200.
    5. Deng, Jianqiu & Yang, Xiaojie & Wang, Qihua, 2022. "Surrogate space based dimension reduction for nonignorable nonresponse," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Mojirsheibani, Majid, 2021. "On classification with nonignorable missing data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Zhang, Jing & Wang, Qihua & Kang, Jian, 2020. "Feature screening under missing indicator imputation with non-ignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    9. Ferrari, Pier Alda & Annoni, Paola & Barbiero, Alessandro & Manzi, Giancarlo, 2011. "An imputation method for categorical variables with application to nonlinear principal component analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2410-2420, July.
    10. Hu Yang & Ning Li & Jing Yang, 2020. "A robust and efficient estimation and variable selection method for partially linear models with large-dimensional covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1911-1937, October.
    11. Y. T. Hwang & C. H. Huang & W. L. Yeh & Y. D. Shen, 2017. "The weighted general linear model for longitudinal medical cost data – an application in colorectal cancer," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 288-307, January.
    12. Menggang Yu & Bin Nan, 2010. "Regression Calibration in Semiparametric Accelerated Failure Time Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 405-414, June.
    13. Yujing Shao & Lei Wang, 2022. "Generalized partial linear models with nonignorable dropouts," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 223-252, February.
    14. Yilin Li & Wang Miao & Ilya Shpitser & Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen, 2023. "A self‐censoring model for multivariate nonignorable nonmonotone missing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3203-3214, December.
    15. Zhuoer Sun & Suojin Wang, 2019. "Semiparametric estimation in regression with missing covariates using single-index models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1201-1232, October.
    16. Xiaojun Mao & Zhonglei Wang & Shu Yang, 2023. "Matrix completion under complex survey sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(3), pages 463-492, June.
    17. Daniel, Rhian M. & Kenward, Michael G., 2012. "A method for increasing the robustness of multiple imputation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1624-1643.
    18. Iván Díaz & Nima S. Hejazi, 2020. "Causal mediation analysis for stochastic interventions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 661-683, July.
    19. Jiwei Zhao & Jun Shao, 2015. "Semiparametric Pseudo-Likelihoods in Generalized Linear Models With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1577-1590, December.
    20. Beunckens, Caroline & Sotto, Cristina & Molenberghs, Geert, 2008. "A simulation study comparing weighted estimating equations with multiple imputation based estimating equations for longitudinal binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1533-1548, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:62:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-019-01103-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.