IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v60y2019i4d10.1007_s00362-016-0870-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation for the Cox model with doubly truncated data

Author

Listed:
  • Pao-sheng Shen

    (Tunghai University)

  • Yi Liu

    (Tunghai University)

Abstract

The partial likelihood (PL) function has been mainly used for the Cox proportional hazards models with censored data. The PL approach can also be used for analyzing left-truncated or left-truncated and right-censored data. However, when data is subject to double truncation, the PL approach no longer works due to the complexities of risk sets. In this article, we propose pseudo maximum likelihood approach for estimating regression coefficients and baseline hazard function for the Cox model with doubly truncated data. We propose expectation-maximization algorithms for obtaining the pseudo maximum likelihood estimators (PMLE). The consistency property of the PMLE is established. Simulations are performed to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the PMLE. The proposed method is illustrated using an AIDS data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Pao-sheng Shen & Yi Liu, 2019. "Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation for the Cox model with doubly truncated data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1207-1224, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:60:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0870-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-016-0870-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-016-0870-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-016-0870-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moreira, Carla & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2013. "Bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation with doubly truncated data," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2013018, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Pao-sheng Shen, 2013. "Regression analysis of interval censored and doubly truncated data with linear transformation models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 581-596, April.
    3. Carla Moreira & Jacobo Uña-Álvarez & Ingrid Keilegom, 2014. "Goodness-of-fit tests for a semiparametric model under random double truncation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1365-1379, October.
    4. Moreira, C. & Van Keilegom, I., 2013. "Bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation with doubly truncated data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 107-123.
    5. Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2006. "Efficient estimation of semiparametric transformation models for counting processes," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 627-640, September.
    6. Kani Chen, 2002. "Semiparametric analysis of transformation models with censored data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(3), pages 659-668, August.
    7. Carla Moreira & Jacobo de Uña-Álvarez, 2010. "Bootstrapping the NPMLE for doubly truncated data," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 567-583.
    8. Ya-Hsuan Hu & Takeshi Emura, 2015. "Maximum likelihood estimation for a special exponential family under random double-truncation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1199-1229, December.
    9. A. N. Pettitt, 1984. "Proportional Odds Models for Survival Data and Estimates Using Ranks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 33(2), pages 169-175, June.
    10. Shen, Yu & Ning, Jing & Qin, Jing, 2009. "Analyzing Length-Biased Data With Semiparametric Transformation and Accelerated Failure Time Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1192-1202.
    11. Moreira, Carla & de Una-Alvarez, Jacobo & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2014. "Goodness-of-fit tests for a semiparametric model under random double truncation," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2014039, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    12. Jian-Jian Ren & Mai Zhou, 2011. "Full likelihood inferences in the Cox model: an empirical likelihood approach," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(5), pages 1005-1018, October.
    13. Moreira, Carla & de Uña-Álvarez, Jacobo & Crujeiras, Rosa M., 2010. "DTDA: An R Package to Analyze Randomly Truncated Data," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 37(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shen, Pao-sheng & Hsu, Huichen, 2020. "Conditional maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric transformation models with doubly truncated data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Lior Rennert & Sharon X. Xie, 2022. "Cox regression model under dependent truncation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 460-473, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Pao-sheng & Hsu, Huichen, 2020. "Conditional maximum likelihood estimation for semiparametric transformation models with doubly truncated data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Achim Dörre & Chung-Yan Huang & Yi-Kuan Tseng & Takeshi Emura, 2021. "Likelihood-based analysis of doubly-truncated data under the location-scale and AFT model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 375-408, March.
    3. Takeshi Emura & Ya-Hsuan Hu & Yoshihiko Konno, 2017. "Asymptotic inference for maximum likelihood estimators under the special exponential family with double-truncation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 877-909, September.
    4. Wang, Qihua & Tong, Xingwei & Sun, Liuquan, 2012. "Exploring the varying covariate effects in proportional odds models with censored data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 168-189.
    5. Micha Mandel & Jacobo de Uña†à lvarez & David K. Simon & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2018. "Inverse probability weighted Cox regression for doubly truncated data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 481-487, June.
    6. Ying Qing Chen & Nan Hu & Su-Chun Cheng & Philippa Musoke & Lue Ping Zhao, 2012. "Estimating Regression Parameters in an Extended Proportional Odds Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(497), pages 318-330, March.
    7. Zhang, Hao Helen & Lu, Wenbin & Wang, Hansheng, 2010. "On sparse estimation for semiparametric linear transformation models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(7), pages 1594-1606, August.
    8. Ya-Hsuan Hu & Takeshi Emura, 2015. "Maximum likelihood estimation for a special exponential family under random double-truncation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1199-1229, December.
    9. Yu-Jen Cheng & Chiung-Yu Huang, 2014. "Combined estimating equation approaches for semiparametric transformation models with length-biased survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 608-618, September.
    10. Chyong-Mei Chen & Pao-sheng Shen & Yi Liu, 2021. "On semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data: pseudo likelihood approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 3-30, February.
    11. Jianbo Li & Minggao Gu & Tao Hu, 2012. "General partially linear varying-coefficient transformation models for ranking data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1475-1488, January.
    12. Xi Ning & Yinghao Pan & Yanqing Sun & Peter B. Gilbert, 2023. "A semiparametric Cox–Aalen transformation model with censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3111-3125, December.
    13. Lior Rennert & Sharon X. Xie, 2018. "Cox regression model with doubly truncated data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 725-733, June.
    14. Chyong-Mei Chen & Pao-Sheng Shen, 2018. "Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 250-272, April.
    15. Yu, Xue & Zhao, Yichuan, 2019. "Empirical likelihood inference for semi-parametric transformation models with length-biased sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 115-125.
    16. Möst Lisa & Hothorn Torsten, 2015. "Conditional Transformation Models for Survivor Function Estimation," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 23-50, May.
    17. Zhao, Yichuan, 2010. "Semiparametric inference for transformation models via empirical likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(8), pages 1846-1858, September.
    18. Kin Yau Wong & Yair Goldberg & Jason P. Fine, 2016. "Oracle estimation of parametric models under boundary constraints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1173-1183, December.
    19. Tan, Xin Lu, 2019. "Optimal estimation of slope vector in high-dimensional linear transformation models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 179-204.
    20. Huang, Bin & Wang, Qihua, 2010. "Semiparametric analysis based on weighted estimating equations for transformation models with missing covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(9), pages 2078-2090, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:60:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0870-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.