IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v59y2018i4d10.1007_s00362-017-0926-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimax test for fuzzy hypotheses

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Parchami

    (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman)

  • S. Mahmoud Taheri

    (University of Tehran)

  • Reinhard Viertl

    (Vienna University of Technology)

  • Mashaallah Mashinchi

    (Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman)

Abstract

In hypotheses testing, such as other statistical problems, we may confront imprecise concepts. One case is a situation in which the hypotheses of interest are imprecise. In this paper, we recall and redefine some concepts about testing fuzzy hypotheses and then we provide a minimax approach to the problem of testing fuzzy hypotheses by using crisp (non-fuzzy) data. We give some illustrative/numerical examples, by which we study the effect of fuzziness by using the power functions of minimax tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Parchami & S. Mahmoud Taheri & Reinhard Viertl & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2018. "Minimax test for fuzzy hypotheses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1623-1648, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:59:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-017-0926-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-017-0926-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-017-0926-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-017-0926-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernhard Arnold, 1996. "An approach to fuzzy hypothesis testing," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-126, December.
    2. P. Filzmoser & R. Viertl, 2004. "Testing hypotheses with fuzzy data: The fuzzy p-value," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 21-29, February.
    3. Hamzeh Torabi & Javad Behboodian, 2007. "Likelihood ratio tests for fuzzy hypotheses testing," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 509-522, September.
    4. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2012. "Testing fuzzy hypotheses based on vague observations: a p-value approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 469-484, May.
    5. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2010. "Fuzzy p-value in testing fuzzy hypotheses with crisp data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 209-226, January.
    6. S. Taheri & G. Hesamian, 2013. "A generalization of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and its applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 457-470, May.
    7. Casals, M. R. & Gil, M. A. & Gil, P., 1986. "The fuzzy decision problem: An approach to the problem of testing statistical hypotheses with fuzzy information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 371-382, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jung-Lin Hung & Cheng-Che Chen & Chun-Mei Lai, 2020. "Possibility Measure of Accepting Statistical Hypothesis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shima Yosefi & Mohsen Arefi & Mohammad Ghasem Akbari, 2016. "A new approach for testing fuzzy hypotheses based on likelihood ratio statistic," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 665-688, September.
    2. Nataliya Chukhrova & Arne Johannssen, 2020. "Randomized versus non-randomized hypergeometric hypothesis testing with crisp and fuzzy hypotheses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2605-2641, December.
    3. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2012. "Testing fuzzy hypotheses based on vague observations: a p-value approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 469-484, May.
    4. S. Taheri & G. Hesamian, 2013. "A generalization of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and its applications," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 457-470, May.
    5. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2009. "Decision-making in testing process performance with fuzzy data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 499-509, March.
    6. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2010. "Fuzzy p-value in testing fuzzy hypotheses with crisp data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 209-226, January.
    7. Jung-Lin Hung & Cheng-Che Chen & Chun-Mei Lai, 2020. "Possibility Measure of Accepting Statistical Hypothesis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Ming Shan & Yu-Shan Li & Bon-Gang Hwang & Jia-En Chua, 2021. "Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Muhammad Aslam, 2022. "Neutrosophic F-Test for Two Counts of Data from the Poisson Distribution with Application in Climatology," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-11, August.
    10. Emily Tang & Chelsea Jones & Lorraine Smith-MacDonald & Matthew R. G. Brown & Eric H. G. J. M. Vermetten & Suzette Brémault-Phillips, 2021. "Decreased Emotional Dysregulation Following Multi-Modal Motion-Assisted Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation Therapy (3MDR): Identifying Possible Driving Factors in Remediation of Treatment-Resi," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    11. Antonio Faúndez-Ugalde & Patricia Toledo-Zúñiga & Pedro Castro-Rodríguez, 2022. "Tax Sustainability: Tax Transparency in Latin America and the Chilean Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Antonio Calcagnì & Luigi Lombardi & Lorenzo Avanzi & Eduardo Pascali, 2020. "Multiple mediation analysis for interval-valued data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 347-369, February.
    13. Gil, Maria Angeles & Lopez-Diaz, Miguel & Lopez-Garcia, Hortensia, 1998. "The fuzzy hyperbolic inequality index associated with fuzzy random variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 377-391, October.
    14. Mohammad Ghasem Akbari & Gholamreza Hesamian, 2017. "Record value based on intuitionistic fuzzy random variables," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(15), pages 3305-3315, November.
    15. Wei Zhang & Shanshan Yu & Ling Wang & Wei Guo & Man-Fai Leung, 2024. "Constrained Symmetric Non-Negative Matrix Factorization with Deep Autoencoders for Community Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. P. Pandian & D. Kalpanapriya, 2013. "Tests of Statistical Hypotheses with Respect to a Fuzzy Set," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Gholamreza Hesamian & Jalal Chachi, 2015. "Two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov fuzzy test for fuzzy random variables," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 61-82, February.
    18. Seongmin Kang & Seong-Dong Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Ammonia Emission Sources Characteristics and Emission Factor Uncertainty at Liquefied Natural Gas Power Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-10, May.
    19. Fernando Reche & María Morales & Antonio Salmerón, 2020. "Statistical Parameters Based on Fuzzy Measures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Bernhard Arnold & Oke Gerke, 2003. "Testing fuzzy linear hypotheses in linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 81-95, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:59:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-017-0926-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.