IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v48y2007i3p509-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood ratio tests for fuzzy hypotheses testing

Author

Listed:
  • Hamzeh Torabi
  • Javad Behboodian

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamzeh Torabi & Javad Behboodian, 2007. "Likelihood ratio tests for fuzzy hypotheses testing," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 509-522, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:48:y:2007:i:3:p:509-522
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-006-0352-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00362-006-0352-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-006-0352-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abbas Parchami & S. Mahmoud Taheri & Reinhard Viertl & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2018. "Minimax test for fuzzy hypotheses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1623-1648, December.
    2. Shima Yosefi & Mohsen Arefi & Mohammad Ghasem Akbari, 2016. "A new approach for testing fuzzy hypotheses based on likelihood ratio statistic," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 665-688, September.
    3. Abbas Parchami & S. Taheri & Mashaallah Mashinchi, 2012. "Testing fuzzy hypotheses based on vague observations: a p-value approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 469-484, May.
    4. Nenghui Kuang & Huantian Xie, 2013. "Large and moderate deviations in testing Rayleigh diffusion model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 591-603, August.
    5. Nataliya Chukhrova & Arne Johannssen, 2020. "Randomized versus non-randomized hypergeometric hypothesis testing with crisp and fuzzy hypotheses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2605-2641, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:48:y:2007:i:3:p:509-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.