IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v76y2024i3d10.1007_s41471-024-00184-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When We Are Happy, We Are the Same—Emotions as a Boundary Condition for the Impact of Cultural Differences on Strategic Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Florian

    (Philipps-University)

  • Philip Meissner

    (ESCP Business School Berlin)

  • Torsten Wulf

    (Philipps-University)

  • Xian Xu

    (Fudan University)

  • Philip Yang

    (Paderborn University)

Abstract

Strategic decision-making research has mainly relied on the values-based approach to culture. However, the dynamic constructivist approach to culture has shown that cultural tendencies may also be altered by contingency factors in the decision-making process itself. We theorize based on the appraisal tendency framework as well as the concept of cultural affordances that emotions, such as happiness, can alter the cultural dispositions of managers from Western and East Asian contexts. To test our hypotheses, we conduct a lab-in-the-field experiment with 187 executives from China and Germany, and measure emotions based on participants’ psychophysiological skin conductance responses. Our results show that happiness moderates and can even reverse initial cultural dispositions in executives’ strategic decision-making behavior. These findings suggest that emotions may be important contingency factors that can alter the initial cultural dispositions of decision makers in the strategy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Florian & Philip Meissner & Torsten Wulf & Xian Xu & Philip Yang, 2024. "When We Are Happy, We Are the Same—Emotions as a Boundary Condition for the Impact of Cultural Differences on Strategic Decisions," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 329-356, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:76:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-024-00184-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-024-00184-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-024-00184-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-024-00184-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:76:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-024-00184-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.