IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v11y1991i3p221-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Positive Affect on Clinical Problem solving

Author

Listed:
  • Alice M. Isen
  • Andrew S. Rosenzweig
  • Mark J. Young

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of positive affect, induced by report of success on an anagram task, on medical decision making among third-year medical students. The subjects were asked to decide which one of six hypothetical patients, each of whom had a solitary pulmonary nodule, was most likely to have lung cancer. They were asked to verbalize their clinical reasoning as they solved the problem. The positive-affect and control groups did not differ in the tendency to make a correct choice, but subjects in the positive-affect condition were significantly earlier in identifying their choices. These subjects were also significantly more likely to go beyond the assigned task, expressing interest in the cases of the other patients and trying to think about their diagnoses, even though that task was not assigned. The positive-affect subjects also showed evidence of configural or integrative consideration of the material to a reliably greater extent than did control subjects, and there was significantly less evidence of confusion or disorganization in their protocols than in those of controls. These findings are compatible with earlier work suggesting a different organizational process and greater efficiency in decision making among people in whom positive affect had been induced, and with recent work suggesting that positive affect facilitates flexibility and inte gration in problem solving. They also indicate that these effects may apply to the problem- solving strategies of professionals in clinical probem-solving situations. Key words: positive affect; medical decision making; problem solving; diagnostic reasoning. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:221-227)

Suggested Citation

  • Alice M. Isen & Andrew S. Rosenzweig & Mark J. Young, 1991. "The Influence of Positive Affect on Clinical Problem solving," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(3), pages 221-227, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:3:p:221-227
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9101100313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9101100313
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9101100313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Estrada, Carlos A. & Isen, Alice M. & Young, Mark J., 1997. "Positive Affect Facilitates Integration of Information and Decreases Anchoring in Reasoning among Physicians," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 117-135, October.
    2. Jennifer Politis & John C. Houtz, 2015. "Effects of Positive Mood on Generative and Evaluative Thinking in Creative Problem Solving," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    3. Timo Kortsch & Ricarda Rehwaldt & Manon E. Schwake & Chantal Licari, 2022. "Does Remote Work Make People Happy? Effects of Flexibilization of Work Location and Working Hours on Happiness at Work and Affective Commitment in the German Banking Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Lili Tian & Huan Chen & E. Huebner, 2014. "The Longitudinal Relationships Between Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction at School and School-Related Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 353-372, October.
    5. Healy, Andrew J. & Malhotra, Neil & Mo, Cecilia H., 2009. "Personal Emotions and Political Decision Making: Implications for Voter Competence," Research Papers 2034, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    6. Jiekun Huang & Nianhang Xu & Honghai Yu, 2020. "Pollution and Performance: Do Investors Make Worse Trades on Hazy Days?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4455-4476, October.
    7. Lyngdoh, Teidorlang & Liu, Annie H. & Sridhar, Guda, 2018. "Applying positive psychology to selling behaviors: A moderated–mediation analysis integrating subjective well-being, coping and organizational identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 142-153.
    8. Paola Magnano & Anna Paolillo & Barbara Giacominelli, 2015. "Dispositional Optimism as a Correlate of Decision-Making Styles in Adolescence," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, June.
    9. Nan Hu & Xingnan Xue & Ling Liu, 2022. "The impact of air pollution on financial reporting quality: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3609-3644, September.
    10. Miner, Andrew G. & Glomb, Theresa M., 2010. "State mood, task performance, and behavior at work: A within-persons approach," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 43-57, May.
    11. Hildreth, J. Angus D & Anderson, Cameron, 2014. "Failure at the top: How power undermines collaborative performance," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt7px2c22n, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    12. Söderlund, Magnus & Berg, Hanna & Ringbo, Joel, 2014. "When the customer has left the store: An examination of the potential for satisfaction rub-off effects and purchase versus no purchase implications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 529-536.
    13. Patrick Flavin & Michael Keane, 2012. "Life Satisfaction and Political Participation: Evidence from the United States," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 63-78, March.
    14. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Pamela S. Barr, 1999. "The Effects of Mood on Individuals' Use of Structured Decision Protocols," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 181-198, April.
    15. Au, Kevin & Chan, Forrest & Wang, Denis & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2003. "Mood in foreign exchange trading: Cognitive processes and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 322-338, July.
    16. Guda Sridhar & Teidorlang Lyngdoh, 2019. "Flow and Information Sharing as Predictors of Ethical Selling Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 807-823, September.
    17. Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Ed Diener & Louis Tay & Cody Xuereb, 2013. "The Objective Benefits of Subjective Well-Being," CEP Discussion Papers dp1236, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:11:y:1991:i:3:p:221-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.