IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v64y2012i5d10.1007_bf03373701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effizienzwirkungen einer Regulierung von Managergehältern durch das Steuerrecht

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Voßmerbäumer

    (Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung In der rechtspolitischen Diskussion um eine Regulierung von Managementvergütungen wird von mehreren Parteien gefordert, den Betriebsausgabenabzug für Vorstandsgehälter einzuschränken, um die als überhöht angesehenen Vergütungen zu begrenzen und die „Subvention“ durch die Steuerzahler zu reduzieren. In A bhängigkeit von der Ausgestaltung der jeweiligen Parteivorschläge wären von einer solchen Regelung in den Jahren 2007–2010 Vergütungsvolumina von mindestens 200 bis 800 Mio. EUR allein für die aktiven Vorstände der 30 DAX- und 50 MDAX-Unternehmen betroffen gewesen. Im Rahmen eines linearen Agency-Modells kann gezeigt werden, dass eine Abzugsbeschränkung für Managergehälter unabhängig von der Funktionsfähigkeit unternehmensinterner Kontrollstrukturen zwar geeignet ist, eine Reduzierung von Managergehältern zu bewirken. Allerdings muss eine Einschränkung des Betriebsausgabenabzugs kein höheres Steueraufkommen zur Folge haben, sondern kann auch zu Aufkommensverlusten führen. Die Vertragsparteien wählen infolge der steuerlichen Verzerrung einen ineffizienten Entlohnungsvertrag, dessen negative Auswirkungen auf das Steueraufkommen durch die Verbreiterung der Bemessungsgrundlage auf Unternehmensebene teilweise nicht kompensiert werden können.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Voßmerbäumer, 2012. "Effizienzwirkungen einer Regulierung von Managergehältern durch das Steuerrecht," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 536-561, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03373701
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373701
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John E. Core & Wayne R. Guay & David F. Larcker, 2003. "Executive equity compensation and incentives: a survey," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 9(Apr), pages 27-50.
    2. Xavier Gabaix & Augustin Landier, 2008. "Why has CEO Pay Increased So Much?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(1), pages 49-100.
    3. Rainer Niemann, 2011. "Asymmetric Taxation and Performance-Based Incentive Contracts," CESifo Working Paper Series 3363, CESifo.
    4. Austan Goolsbee, 2000. "What Happens When You Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(2), pages 352-378, April.
    5. Cho, In-Koo, 2005. "Introduction to learning and bounded rationality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 127-128, October.
    6. Blacconiere, Walter G. & Johnson, Marilyn F. & Lewis, Melissa F., 2008. "The role of tax regulation and compensation contracts in the decision to voluntarily expense employee stock options," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 101-111, September.
    7. Lucian Arye Bebchuk & Jesse M. Fried, 2003. "Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(3), pages 71-92, Summer.
    8. Jensen, Michael C & Murphy, Kevin J, 1990. "Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(2), pages 225-264, April.
    9. Doina Radulescu, 2012. "The Effects of a Bonus Tax on Manager Compensation and Welfare," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 68(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Michael S. Long, 1992. "The Incentives Behind the Adoption of Executive Stock Option Plans in U.S. Corporations," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 21(3), Fall.
    11. Balsam, Steven & Jennifer Yin, Qin, 2005. "Explaining firm willingness to forfeit tax deductions under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m): The million-dollar cap," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 300-324.
    12. Brian J. Hall & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 1998. "Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(3), pages 653-691.
    13. Rainer Niemann, 2008. "The Effects of Differential Taxation on Managerial Effort and Risk Taking," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 64(3), pages 273-310, September.
    14. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1987. "Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 303-328, March.
    15. Simpson David M., 2005. "A Review of Introduction to Homeland Security," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-6, June.
    16. Perry, Tod & Zenner, Marc, 2001. "Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 453-488, December.
    17. Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Fried, Jesse M., 2003. "Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem," Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics, Working Paper Series qt81q3136r, Berkeley Olin Program in Law & Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Voßmerbäumer, Jan, 2012. "Effizienzwirkungen einer Regulierung von Managergehältern durch das Steuerrecht," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 125, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Chongwoo Choe & Gloria Tian & Xiangkang Yin, 2008. "Managerial Power, Stock-Based Compensation, And Firm Performance: Theory And Evidence," Monash Economics Working Papers 21/08, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    3. Voßmerbäumer, Jan & Wagner, Franz W., 2013. "Steuerwirkungen betrieblicher Entgeltpolitik," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 144, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    4. Paula Faria & Franscisco Vitorino Martins & Elísio Brandão, 2013. "The level of CEO compensation for the short and long-term - a view on high-tech firms," FEP Working Papers 519, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    5. Dietl Helmut M & Duschl Tobias & Lang Markus, 2011. "Executive Pay Regulation: What Regulators, Shareholders, and Managers Can Learn from Major Sports Leagues," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, August.
    6. Page, T. Beau, 2018. "CEO attributes, compensation, and firm value: Evidence from a structural estimation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 378-401.
    7. Fernando Núñez & Ángel Arcos-Vargas & Carlos Usabiaga & Pablo Álvarez-de-Toledo, 2022. "On directors’ compensation: a multilevel analysis of Spanish listed companies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2173-2207, October.
    8. Katsuyuki Kubo & Takuji Saito, 2008. "The Relationship Between Financial Incentives For Company Presidents And Firm Performance In Japan," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 59(4), pages 401-418, December.
    9. Paula Faria & Franscisco Vitorino Martins & Elísio Brandão, 2013. "CEO compensation in high-tech firms and changes in the SFAS No 123 (R)," FEP Working Papers 518, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    10. Daniel Beck & Gunther Friedl & Peter Schäfer, 2020. "Executive compensation in Germany," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 787-824, June.
    11. Arantxa Jarque, 2008. "CEO compensation : trends, market changes, and regulation," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 94(Sum), pages 265-300.
    12. Fabbri, Francesca & Marin, Dalia, 2012. "What explains the rise in CEO pay in Germany? A Panel Data Analysis for 1977-2009," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 374, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    13. Matthias Kiefer & Edward Jones & Andrew Adams, 2016. "Principals, Agents and Incomplete Contracts: Are Surrender of Control and Renegotiation the Solution?," CFI Discussion Papers 1603, Centre for Finance and Investment, Heriot Watt University.
    14. Yaowen Shan & Terry Walter, 2016. "Towards a Set of Design Principles for Executive Compensation Contracts," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(4), pages 619-684, December.
    15. Miguel Antón & Florian Ederer & Mireia Giné & Martin Schmalz, 2023. "Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(5), pages 1294-1355.
    16. Frydman, Carola & Molloy, Raven S., 2011. "Does tax policy affect executive compensation? Evidence from postwar tax reforms," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1425-1437.
    17. Wolfgang Drobetz & Pascal Pensa & Markus M. Schmid, 2007. "Estimating the Cost of Executive Stock Options: evidence from Switzerland," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 798-815, September.
    18. Ibrahim, Salma & Li, Hao & Yan, Yan & Zhao, Jinsha, 2021. "Pay me a single figure! Assessing the impact of single figure regulation on CEO pay," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Kuang, Y. & Qin, B., 2006. "Performance-vested Stock Options and Pay-Performance Sensitivity," Other publications TiSEM 13484e72-b9cf-4c3a-8fc5-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Renée B. Adams & Daniel Ferreira, 2009. "Strong Managers, Weak Boards?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 55(3-4), pages 482-514.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    H24; H25; M12;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:5:d:10.1007_bf03373701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.