IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v86y2011i2d10.1007_s11192-010-0289-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Chun Chen

    (Heidelberg University)

  • Hsiao-Yun Yeh

    (Taipei Veterans General Hospital)

  • Jau-Ching Wu

    (Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    National Yang-Ming University
    National Yang-Ming University)

  • Ingo Haschler

    (Heidelberg University)

  • Tzeng-Ji Chen

    (Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    National Yang-Ming University)

  • Thomas Wetter

    (Heidelberg University)

Abstract

The trend to use administrative health care databases as research material is increasing but not well explored. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), one of the largest administrative health care databases around the world, has been used widely in academic studies. This study analyzed 383 NHIRD studies published between 2000 and 2009 to quantify the effects on overall growth, scholar response, and spread of the study fields. The NHIRD studies expanded rapidly in both quantity and quality since the first study was published in 2000. Researchers usually collaborated to share knowledge, which was crucial to process the NHIRD data. However, once the fundamental problem had been overcome, success to get published became more reproducible. NHIRD studies were also published diversely in a growing number of journals. Both general health and clinical science studies benefited from NHIRD. In conclusion, this new research material widely promotes scientific production in a greater magnitude. The experience of Taiwan’s NHIRD should encourage national- or institutional-level data holders to consider re-using their administrative databases for academic purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Chun Chen & Hsiao-Yun Yeh & Jau-Ching Wu & Ingo Haschler & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Thomas Wetter, 2011. "Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database: administrative health care database as study object in bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 365-380, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:86:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0289-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-010-0289-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. M. Gupta & C. R. Karisiddappa, 2000. "Modelling the Growth of Literature in the Area of Theoretical Population Genetics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(2), pages 321-355, October.
    2. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Manuel Torralbo & Mónica Vallejo, 2004. "Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 61(3), pages 301-321, November.
    3. Katarina Larsen, 2008. "Knowledge network hubs and measures of research impact, science structure, and publication output in nanostructured solar cell research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(1), pages 123-142, January.
    4. Ismael Rafols & Martin Meyer, 2010. "Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(2), pages 263-287, February.
    5. Marek Szydłowski & Adam Krawiec, 2009. "Growth cycles of knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 99-111, January.
    6. Loet Leydesdorff & Ismael Rafols, 2009. "A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(2), pages 348-362, February.
    7. Lambiotte, R. & Panzarasa, P., 2009. "Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 180-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shih-Wei Liu & Liang-Chung Huang & Wu-Fu Chung & Jauching Wu & Li-Fu Chen & Yu-Chun Chen, 2018. "Tetanus Vaccination and Extra-Immunization among Adult Populations: Eight-Year Follow Up Cohort Study of 771,443 Adults in Taiwan, 2006–2013," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Manuel Torralbo & Mónica Vallejo, 2012. "Time series of scientific growth in Spanish doctoral theses (1848–2009)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 15-36, April.
    3. Yuxin Zhu & Zheyu Wang & David Newman‐Toker, 2023. "Misdiagnosis‐related harm quantification through mixture models and harm measures," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2633-2648, September.
    4. Cheung-Ter Ong & Shew-Meei Sheu & Ching-Fang Tsai & Yi-Sin Wong & Solomon Chih-Cheng Chen, 2015. "Age-Dependent Sex Difference of the Incidence and Mortality of Status Epilepticus: A Twelve Year Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Ming-Chieh Tsai & Chao-Hung Chen & Hsin-Chien Lee & Herng-Ching Lin & Cha-Ze Lee, 2015. "Increased Risk of Depressive Disorder following Cholecystectomy for Gallstones," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Ta-Peng Wu & Cheng-Hung Tsai & Yu-Ting Su & Chu-Chiao Wang & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Ching-Mao Chang & Fang-Pey Chen, 2018. "The Evaluation of Professional Divisions of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Taiwan through Patient Visit Records of 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Yi-Jen Wang & Shu-Chiung Chiang & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Li-Fang Chou & Shinn-Jang Hwang & Jui-Yao Liu, 2017. "Birth Trends among Female Physicians in Taiwan: A Nationwide Survey from 1996 to 2013," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-8, July.
    8. Yu-Lung Chiu & Senyong Kao & Herng-Ching Lin & Ming-Chieh Tsai & Cha-Ze Lee, 2016. "Healthcare Service Utilization for Practicing Physicians: A Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, January.
    9. Hsien-Wei Ting & Ting-Ying Chien & K. Robert Lai & Ren-Hao Pan & Kuan-Hsien Wu & Jun-Min Chen & Chien-Lung Chan, 2017. "Differences in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Cases between Urban and Rural Regions of Taiwan: Big Data Analytics of Government Open Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Chien-Che Wang & Chao-Chiang Tu & Pi-Chieh Wang & Herng-Ching Lin & Po-Li Wei, 2013. "Outcome Comparison between Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy: Evidence from a Nationwide Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-7, July.
    11. Wu-Fu Chung & Shih-Wei Liu & Peng-Yuan Chang & Feng-Shu Lin & Li-Fu Chen & Jau-Ching Wu & Yu-Chun Chen & Laura Liu & Wen-Cheng Huang & Henrich Cheng & Su-Shun Lo, 2015. "Hyperlipidemia and Statins Affect Neurological Outcome in Lumbar Spine Injury," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Shiu-Dong Chung & Shih-Ping Liu & Jau-Jiuan Sheu & Ching-Chun Lin & Herng-Ching Lin & Chao-Hung Chen, 2014. "Increased Healthcare Service Utilizations for Patients with Dementia: A Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-5, August.
    13. Li-Ting Kao & Hsin-Chien Lee & Herng-Ching Lin & Ming-Chieh Tsai & Shiu-Dong Chung, 2015. "Healthcare Service Utilization by Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Population-Based Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-9, September.
    14. Liang-Chung Huang & Wu-Fu Chung & Shih-Wei Liu & Jau-Ching Wu & Li-Fu Chen & Yu-Chun Chen, 2019. "Characteristics of Non-Emergent Visits in Emergency Departments: Profiles and Longitudinal Pattern Changes in Taiwan, 2000–2010," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Chun-Hsiang Chiu & Po-Chung Chen & Ying-Chuan Wang & Cheng-Li Lin & Feng-You Lee & Chia-Chang Wu & Kuang-Hsi Chang, 2019. "Risk of Dementia in Patients with Leptospirosis: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruimin Ma & Erjia Yan, 2016. "Uncovering inter-specialty knowledge communication using author citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(2), pages 839-854, November.
    2. Stephen Carley & Alan L. Porter, 2012. "A forward diversity index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 407-427, February.
    3. Daniel Torres-Salinas & Nicolás Robinson-García & Álvaro Cabezas-Clavijo & Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras, 2014. "Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2113-2127, March.
    4. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 12-23.
    5. Rafols, Ismael & Leydesdorff, Loet & O’Hare, Alice & Nightingale, Paul & Stirling, Andy, 2012. "How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 1262-1282.
    6. Antonio Fernández-Cano & Manuel Torralbo & Mónica Vallejo, 2012. "Time series of scientific growth in Spanish doctoral theses (1848–2009)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 15-36, April.
    7. Lorenzo Cassi & Wilfriedo Mescheba & Élisabeth Turckheim, 2014. "How to evaluate the degree of interdisciplinarity of an institution?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1871-1895, December.
    8. Alfonso Ávila-Robinson & Kumiko Miyazaki, 2013. "Evolutionary paths of change of emerging nanotechnological innovation systems: the case of ZnO nanostructures," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 829-849, June.
    9. Jens Peter Andersen & Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 371-383, August.
    10. Fusillo, Fabrizio, 2020. "Are Green Inventions really more complex? Evidence from European Patents," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 202002, University of Turin.
    11. Lina Xu & Steven Dellaportas & Jin Wang, 2022. "A study of interdisciplinary accounting research: analysing the diversity of cited references," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2131-2162, June.
    12. Qiuju Zhou & Ronald Rousseau & Liying Yang & Ting Yue & Guoliang Yang, 2012. "A general framework for describing diversity within systems and similarity between systems with applications in informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 787-812, December.
    13. Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge & Rosa Lidia Vega-Almeida & José Luis Jiménez-Andrade & Humberto Carrillo-Calvet, 2022. "Evolutionary stages and multidisciplinary nature of artificial intelligence research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5139-5158, September.
    14. Ismael Rafols & Alan Porter & Loet Leydesdorff, 2009. "Overlay Maps of Science: a New Tool for Research Policy," SPRU Working Paper Series 179, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Yan, Erjia & Ding, Ying & Cronin, Blaise & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2013. "A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 249-264.
    16. Goldman, Alyssa W., 2014. "Conceptualizing the interdisciplinary diffusion and evolution of emerging fields: The case of systems biology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 43-58.
    17. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Nicola Melluso & Francesco Alessandro Massucci, 2022. "Exploring the antecedents of interdisciplinarity at the European Research Council: a topic modeling approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6961-6991, December.
    18. Shunshun Shi & Wenyu Zhang & Shuai Zhang & Jie Chen, 2018. "Does prestige dimension influence the interdisciplinary performance of scientific entities in knowledge flow? Evidence from the e-government field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 1237-1264, November.
    19. Timothy D. Bowman & Andrew Tsou & Chaoqun Ni & Cassidy R. Sugimoto, 2014. "Post-interdisciplinary frames of reference: exploring permeability and perceptions of disciplinarity in the social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(3), pages 1695-1714, December.
    20. Hric, Darko & Kaski, Kimmo & Kivelä, Mikko, 2018. "Stochastic block model reveals maps of citation patterns and their evolution in time," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 757-783.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:86:y:2011:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-010-0289-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.