IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v13y2021i3d10.1007_s12469-020-00238-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of bus bridging scenarios for railway service disruption management: a users’ delay modelling tool

Author

Listed:
  • Aya Aboudina

    (Cairo University
    University of Toronto)

  • Alaa Itani

    (University of Toronto)

  • Ehab Diab

    (University of Toronto
    University of Saskatchewan)

  • Siva Srikukenthiran

    (University of Toronto)

  • Amer Shalaby

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

Unexpected transit service disruptions degrade the quality of service provided to the public. Bus bridging is considered a key response strategy used to handle metro service interruptions, where buses are retracted from scheduled services and deployed to offer shuttle services along disrupted segments. Most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches (based on experience) to determine which buses should be dispatched from the scheduled services, with little (or no) consideration of the impacts on users’ delays. This paper presents a practical tool to estimate the total users’ delay associated with a user-specified bus bridging plan. The tool is based on deterministic queueing theory. The total delay is composed of two components; direct delays of affected metro passengers along the disrupted segment and indirect delays of bus riders on the routes from which shuttle buses are dispatched. The tool utilizes several input data, including travel times, train load information, boarding and alighting passenger counts, bus frequencies, and routes’ cycle times. It provides transit practitioners and operational managers with a valuable instrument for evaluating different bus bridging scenarios. A case study of the transit network in Toronto is used to illustrate the tool’s functionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Aya Aboudina & Alaa Itani & Ehab Diab & Siva Srikukenthiran & Amer Shalaby, 2021. "Evaluation of bus bridging scenarios for railway service disruption management: a users’ delay modelling tool," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 457-481, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:13:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00238-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-020-00238-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-020-00238-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-020-00238-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cats, Oded & Jenelius, Erik, 2015. "Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-61.
    2. Cats, O., 2016. "The robustness value of public transport development plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 236-246.
    3. Jian Gang Jin & Kwong Meng Teo & Amedeo R. Odoni, 2016. "Optimizing Bus Bridging Services in Response to Disruptions of Urban Transit Rail Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 790-804, August.
    4. Robert B. Noland & John W. Polak, 2002. "Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 39-54, January.
    5. Ehab I. Diab & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2015. "Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 292-328, May.
    6. Bates, John & Polak, John & Jones, Peter & Cook, Andrew, 0. "The valuation of reliability for personal travel," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 191-229, April.
    7. Siva Srikukenthiran & Amer Shalaby, 2017. "Enabling large-scale transit microsimulation for disruption response support using the Nexus platform," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 411-435, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheng Dong & Afaq Khattak & Feng Chen & Feifei Xu, 2024. "Stay Two-Meters Apart: Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 Social Distancing Protocols on Subway Station Walkway Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grisé, Emily & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2017. "Evaluating the relationship between socially (dis)advantaged neighbourhoods and customer satisfaction of bus service in London, U.K," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Emily Grisé & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2020. "Assessing operation and customer perception characteristics of high frequency local and limited-stop bus service in Vancouver, Canada," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 519-534, October.
    3. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    4. Carrion, Carlos & Levinson, David, 2012. "Value of travel time reliability: A review of current evidence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 720-741.
    5. Hong, Liu & Ye, Bowen & Yan, Han & Zhang, Hui & Ouyang, Min & (Sean) He, Xiaozheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal vulnerability analysis of railway systems with heterogeneous train flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 725-744.
    6. Soriguera, Francesc, 2014. "On the value of highway travel time information systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 294-310.
    7. Hollander, Yaron, 2006. "Direct versus indirect models for the effects of unreliability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 699-711, November.
    8. Hongcheng Gan & Yang Bai, 2014. "The effect of travel time variability on route choice decision: a generalized linear mixed model based analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 339-350, March.
    9. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. N. Oort, 2016. "Incorporating enhanced service reliability of public transport in cost-benefit analyses," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 143-160, March.
    11. Gardner, Lauren M. & Boyles, Stephen D. & Waller, S. Travis, 2011. "Quantifying the benefit of responsive pricing and travel information in the stochastic congestion pricing problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 204-218, March.
    12. Wen Hua & Ghim Ping Ong, 2018. "Effect of information contagion during train service disruption for an integrated rail-bus transit system," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 571-594, December.
    13. Fosgerau, Mogens & Fukuda, Daisuke, 2010. "Valuing travel time variability: Characteristics of the travel time distribution on an urban road," MPRA Paper 24330, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Iliopoulou, Christina & Makridis, Michail A., 2023. "Critical multi-link disruption identification for public transport networks: A multi-objective optimization framework," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 626(C).
    15. Shahabi, Mehrdad & Unnikrishnan, Avinash & Boyles, Stephen D., 2013. "An outer approximation algorithm for the robust shortest path problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 52-66.
    16. Cats, Oded & Koppenol, Gert-Jaap & Warnier, Martijn, 2017. "Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 544-553.
    17. Fosgerau, Mogens & Karlström, Anders, 2010. "The value of reliability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 38-49, January.
    18. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Grisé, Emily & Maguire, Meadhbh & Veillette, Marie-Pier & Deboosere, Robbin & Berrebi, Emma & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2018. "Invest in the ride: A 14 year longitudinal analysis of the determinants of public transport ridership in 25 North American cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 434-445.
    19. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    20. van Loon, Ruben & Rietveld, Piet & Brons, Martijn, 2011. "Travel-time reliability impacts on railway passenger demand: a revealed preference analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 917-925.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:13:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12469-020-00238-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.