IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v57y2020i1d10.1007_s12597-019-00419-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis of censoring schemes in progressively type-II right censored order statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Uoseph Hamdi Salemi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Esmaile Khorram

    (Amirkabir University of Technology)

  • Yuancheng Si

    (University of Manchester)

  • Saralees Nadarajah

    (University of Manchester)

Abstract

We study the sensitivity of some optimality criteria based on progressively type-II right censored order statistics scheme changes and explain how the sensitivity analysis helps to find the optimal censoring schemes. We find that determining an optimal censoring plan among a class of one-step censoring schemes is not always recommended. We consider optimality criteria as the model output of a sensitivity analysis problem and quantify how this model depends on its input factor and censoring scheme, using local and global sensitivity methods. Finally, we propose a simple method to find the optimal scheme among all possible censoring schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Uoseph Hamdi Salemi & Esmaile Khorram & Yuancheng Si & Saralees Nadarajah, 2020. "Sensitivity analysis of censoring schemes in progressively type-II right censored order statistics," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(1), pages 163-189, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:57:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00419-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00419-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-019-00419-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-019-00419-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadine Kafa & Yasmina Hani & Abederrahman El Mhamedi, 2018. "Evaluating and selecting partners in sustainable supply chain network: a comparative analysis of combined fuzzy multi-criteria approaches," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 14-49, March.
    2. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    3. M. El-Din & A. Shafay, 2013. "One- and two-sample Bayesian prediction intervals based on progressively Type-II censored data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 287-307, May.
    4. S. Priyan & P. Manivannan, 2017. "Optimal inventory modeling of supply chain system involving quality inspection errors and fuzzy defective rate," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(1), pages 21-43, March.
    5. Kotb, M.S. & Raqab, M.Z., 2019. "Statistical inference for modified Weibull distribution based on progressively type-II censored data," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 233-248.
    6. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    7. Chansoo Kim & Keunhee Han, 2010. "Estimation of the scale parameter of the half-logistic distribution under progressively type II censored sample," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 375-387, June.
    8. U. H. Salemi & S. Rezaei & Y. Si & S. Nadarajah, 2018. "On Optimal Progressive Censoring Schemes for Normal Distribution," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 637-658, December.
    9. Balakrishnan, N. & Burkschat, Marco & Cramer, Erhard & Hofmann, Glenn, 2008. "Fisher information based progressive censoring plans," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 366-380, December.
    10. Guido Ridolfi & Erwin Mooij, 2016. "Regression-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Robust Design," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Giorgio Fasano & János D. Pintér (ed.), Space Engineering, pages 303-336, Springer.
    11. Kajal Chatterjee & Samarjit Kar, 2016. "Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 474-499, September.
    12. Surajit Nath & Bijan Sarkar, 2018. "Decision system framework for performance evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology under fuzzy environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(3), pages 703-720, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uoseph Hamdi Salemi & Sadegh Rezaei & Saralees Nadarajah, 2019. "A-optimal and D-optimal censoring plans in progressively Type-II right censored order statistics," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1349-1367, August.
    2. Chidozie Chukwuemeka Nwobi-Okoye, 2020. "Modelling the performance of single-input–single-output (SISO) processes using transfer function and fuzzy logic," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(3), pages 815-836, September.
    3. Nikishova, Anna & Comi, Giovanni E. & Hoekstra, Alfons G., 2020. "Sensitivity analysis based dimension reduction of multiscale models," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 205-220.
    4. Zdeněk Kala, 2021. "New Importance Measures Based on Failure Probability in Global Sensitivity Analysis of Reliability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Straub, Daniel & Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason, 2022. "Decision-theoretic reliability sensitivity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    7. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    8. F. Wang & G. H. Huang & Y. Fan & Y. P. Li, 2020. "Robust Subsampling ANOVA Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Water Resource and Environmental Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(10), pages 3199-3217, August.
    9. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    10. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    11. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    12. Matteo Fontana & Massimo Tavoni & Simone Vantini, 2020. "Global Sensitivity and Domain-Selective Testing for Functional-Valued Responses: An Application to Climate Economy Models," Papers 2006.13850, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    13. Park, Sangun & Ng, Hon Keung Tony & Chan, Ping Shing, 2015. "On the Fisher information and design of a flexible progressive censored experiment," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 142-149.
    14. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Feng, Kaixuan & Li, Luyi, 2019. "An elaborate algorithm for analyzing the Borgonovo moment-independent sensitivity by replacing the probability density function estimation with the probability estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 99-108.
    15. Balakrishnan, N. & Saleh, H.M., 2011. "Relations for moments of progressively Type-II censored order statistics from half-logistic distribution with applications to inference," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(10), pages 2775-2792, October.
    16. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Magni, Carlo Alberto & Marchioni, Andrea, 2020. "Average rates of return, working capital, and NPV-consistency in project appraisal: A sensitivity analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    18. Ghazi M. Magableh & Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Taha Rababah & Ali Almajwal & Numan Al-Rayyan, 2024. "A Developed Model and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Evaluate Supply Chain Nervousness Strategies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    20. Li, Haihe & Wang, Pan & Huang, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Zheng & Zhou, Changcong & Yue, Zhufeng, 2021. "Vine copula-based parametric sensitivity analysis of failure probability-based importance measure in the presence of multidimensional dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:57:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00419-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.