IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v17y2017i1d10.1007_s12351-015-0216-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Rashed Khanjani Shiraz

    (University of Tabriz)

  • Madjid Tavana

    (La Salle University
    University of Paderborn)

  • Hirofumi Fukuyama

    (Fukuoka University)

  • Debora Di Caprio

    (York University
    Polo Tecnologico IISS G. Galilei)

Abstract

Geometric programming (GP) is a powerful tool for solving a variety of optimization problems. Most GP problems involve precise parameters. However, the observed values of the parameters in real-life GP problems are often imprecise or vague and, consequently, the optimization process and the related decisions take place in the face of uncertainty. The uncertainty associated with the coefficients of GP problems can be formalized using fuzzy variables. In this paper, we propose chance-constrained GP to deal with the impreciseness and the ambiguity inherent to real-life GP problems. Given a fuzzy GP model, we formulate three variants of chance-constrained GP based on the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches and show how they can be transformed into equivalent deterministic GP problems to be solved via the duality algorithm. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed models and the efficacy of the introduced procedures with two numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s12351-015-0216-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-015-0216-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-015-0216-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-015-0216-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Kall & János Mayer, 2005. "Stochastic Linear Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-24440-2, December.
    2. Tsai, Jung-Fa & Lin, Ming-Hua & Hu, Yi-Chung, 2007. "On generalized geometric programming problems with non-positive variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 10-19, April.
    3. TAVANA, Madjid & SHIRAZ, Rashed Khanjani & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel & AGRELL, Per J., 2012. "Fuzzy stochastic data envelopment analysis with application to base realignment and closure (BRAC)," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2412, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. EMROUZNEJAD, Ali & TAVANA, Madjid & HATAMI-MARBINI, Adel, 2014. "The state of the art in fuzzy data envelopment analysis," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2543, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    6. Rommelfanger, Heinrich, 1996. "Fuzzy linear programming and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 512-527, August.
    7. Banker, Rajiv D & Maindiratta, Ajay, 1988. "Nonparametric Analysis of Technical and Allocative Efficiencies in Production," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1315-1332, November.
    8. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2008. "Posynomial geometric programming with interval exponents and coefficients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 17-27, April.
    9. Elmor Peterson, 2001. "The Origins of Geometric Programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 15-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wasim Akram Mandal, 2021. "Weighted Tchebycheff Optimization Technique Under Uncertainty," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 709-731, December.
    2. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Salman Khodayifar & Panos M. Pardalos, 2021. "Copula theory approach to stochastic geometric programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 435-468, October.
    3. Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2021. "Balancing irrigation planning and risk preference for sustainable irrigated agriculture: A fuzzy credibility-based optimization model with the Hurwicz criterion under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    4. Wasim Akram Mandal & Sahidul Islam, 2017. "Multiobjective geometric programming problem under uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 85-109.
    5. Belleh Fontem, 2023. "Robust Chance-Constrained Geometric Programming with Application to Demand Risk Mitigation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 765-797, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Zahra Ghelej Beigi & Jens Leth Hougaard & Kobra Gholami, 2014. "Estimating Returns to Scale in Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," MSAP Working Paper Series 07_2014, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    2. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 243-265, July.
    3. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    4. Toloo, Mehdi & Keshavarz, Esmaeil & Hatami-Marbini, Adel, 2018. "Dual-role factors for imprecise data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 15-31.
    5. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2018. "Integrating geometric programming with rough set theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, April.
    6. Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kato, Kosuke & Nishizaki, Ichiro, 2003. "An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming problems through an expectation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 665-672, March.
    7. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Adel Hatami-Marbini & Ali Emrouznejad & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2020. "Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1863-1898, September.
    8. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    9. Wasim Akram Mandal, 2021. "Weighted Tchebycheff Optimization Technique Under Uncertainty," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 709-731, December.
    10. Pejman Peykani & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Ali Ebrahimnejad & Emran Mohammadi, 2022. "Fuzzy chance-constrained data envelopment analysis: a structured literature review, current trends, and future directions," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 197-261, June.
    11. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    12. Ahmad, Usman, 2011. "Financial Reforms and Banking Efficiency: Case of Pakistan," MPRA Paper 34220, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    14. Shen, Feifei & Zhao, Liang & Wang, Meihong & Du, Wenli & Qian, Feng, 2022. "Data-driven adaptive robust optimization for energy systems in ethylene plant under demand uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    15. Mikhailov, L., 2004. "A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(3), pages 687-704, December.
    16. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    17. Kamjoo, Azadeh & Maheri, Alireza & Putrus, Ghanim A., 2014. "Chance constrained programming using non-Gaussian joint distribution function in design of standalone hybrid renewable energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 677-688.
    18. Jana, R.K. & Sharma, Dinesh K. & Chakraborty, B., 2016. "A hybrid probabilistic fuzzy goal programming approach for agricultural decision-making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 134-141.
    19. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Tind, Jørgen, 2009. "Cost allocation and convex data envelopment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(3), pages 939-947, May.
    20. Bilsel, R. Ufuk & Ravindran, A., 2011. "A multiobjective chance constrained programming model for supplier selection under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1284-1300, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:17:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s12351-015-0216-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.