IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v254y2021ics0378377421002146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing irrigation planning and risk preference for sustainable irrigated agriculture: A fuzzy credibility-based optimization model with the Hurwicz criterion under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Chenglong
  • Li, Xuemin
  • Guo, Ping
  • Huo, Zailin

Abstract

The challenge of irrigation planning is that it involves various system components, which is further exacerbated by uncertainties and risk preference in making decisions. This study presents a simulation-optimization framework under uncertainty by incorporating fuzzy credibility-based optimization model with the Hurwicz criterion and daily water balance simulation for irrigation planning. The developed methodology can effectively handle fuzzy uncertainty in the objective function and constraints and readily analyze tradeoffs between optimal solutions of irrigation planning and risks associated with the decision-makers’ preferences. It can also derive several physical parameters expressed as water depth from the water balance of root zone for determining optimal irrigation water amount. The Hurwicz criterion, fuzzy credibility constraints and other irrigation-related constraints are imposed on the study system through the developed framework. Then, its applicability is illustrated with a real case study in the Jiefangzha irrigation subarea in the Hetao Irrigation District, northwest China, which is an arid area. Optimal results using three risk-related parameters, i.e., nine preference weights (λ = 0.1, 0.2, … and 0.9) of objective function, and three credibility levels (α = 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9, β = 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9) of fuzzy constraints, have been generated for supporting irrigation planning. Based on these outcomes, system benefits resulting from agricultural production have a slight growth with preference weights increase from 0.1 to 0.9, showing that optimistic criterion plays a decisive role in optimal irrigation planning solutions, especially when preference weights are greater than 0.7. Daily groundwater depth is presented in the given 81 scenarios for comparison, showing the usefulness of the developed framework in practical applications. Therefore, these findings are helpful for supporting irrigation planning and balancing tradeoffs between irrigation planning and risk preference for sustainable irrigated agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2021. "Balancing irrigation planning and risk preference for sustainable irrigated agriculture: A fuzzy credibility-based optimization model with the Hurwicz criterion under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:254:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002146
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421002146
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106949?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Xu & Huang, Guanhua & Qu, Zhongyi & Pereira, Luis S., 2010. "Assessing the groundwater dynamics and impacts of water saving in the Hetao Irrigation District, Yellow River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 301-313, December.
    2. Gaiqiang Yang & Ping Guo & Mo Li & Shiqi Fang & Liudong Zhang, 2016. "An Improved Solving Approach for Interval-Parameter Programming and Application to an Optimal Allocation of Irrigation Water Problem," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 701-729, January.
    3. Bernhard Arnold & Ingrid Größl & Peter Stahlecker, 2002. "The Minimax, the Minimin, and the Hurwicz Adjustment Principle," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 233-260, May.
    4. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.
    5. Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Singh, Vijay P., 2016. "An efficient irrigation water allocation model under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 46-57.
    6. Zhang, Y.M. & Huang, G.H. & Lin, Q.G. & Lu, H.W., 2012. "Integer fuzzy credibility constrained programming for power system management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 398-405.
    7. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Irrigation water resources optimization with consideration of the regional agro-hydrological process of crop growth and multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2016. "Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 76-88.
    9. Gaiqiang Yang & Ping Guo & Mo Li & Shiqi Fang & Liudong Zhang, 2016. "An Improved Solving Approach for Interval-Parameter Programming and Application to an Optimal Allocation of Irrigation Water Problem," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(2), pages 701-729, January.
    10. Ajay Singh, 2014. "Irrigation Planning and Management Through Optimization Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Wen, Meilin & Iwamura, Kakuzo, 2008. "Fuzzy facility location-allocation problem under the Hurwicz criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 627-635, January.
    12. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Guanhua, 2018. "Growth responses of crops and natural vegetation to irrigation and water table changes in an agro-ecosystem of Hetao, upper Yellow River basin: Scenario analysis on maize, sunflower, watermelon and ta," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 93-104.
    13. Dattatray Regulwar & Jyotiba Gurav, 2011. "Irrigation Planning Under Uncertainty—A Multi Objective Fuzzy Linear Programming Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(5), pages 1387-1416, March.
    14. Huang, G. H., 1998. "A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 137-158, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Yu & Ren, Chongfeng & Zhang, Hongbo & Xie, Zhishuai & Wang, Yashi, 2022. "Managing irrigation water resources with economic benefit and energy consumption: an interval linear multi-objective fractional optimization model under multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Liu, Yanqi & Lin, Yifan & Huo, Zailin & Zhang, Chenglong & Wang, Chaozi & Xue, Jingyuan & Huang, Guanhua, 2022. "Spatio-temporal variation of irrigation water requirements for wheat and maize in the Yellow River Basin, China, 1974–2017," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    3. Zhang, Chenglong & Yang, Gaiqiang & Wang, Chaozi & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Linking agricultural water-food-environment nexus with crop area planning: A fuzzy credibility-based multi-objective linear fractional programming approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Li, Mo & Fu, Qiang & Singh, Vijay P. & Liu, Dong, 2018. "An interval multi-objective programming model for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-36.
    3. Zhang, Chenglong & Li, Xuemin & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2020. "An improved interval-based fuzzy credibility-constrained programming approach for supporting optimal irrigation water management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    4. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2018. "A Multi-Objective Energy and Environmental Systems Planning Model: Management of Uncertainties and Risks for Shanxi Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Liuyue He & Sufen Wang & Congcong Peng & Qian Tan, 2018. "Optimization of Water Consumption Distribution Based on Crop Suitability in the Middle Reaches of Heihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Cong Dong & Gordon Huang & Guanhui Cheng & Shan Zhao, 2018. "Water Resources and Farmland Management in the Songhua River Watershed under Interval and Fuzzy Uncertainties," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(13), pages 4177-4200, October.
    8. Wen, Yeqiang & Shang, Songhao & Rahman, Khalil Ur & Xia, Yuhong & Ren, Dongyang, 2020. "A semi-distributed drainage model for monthly drainage water and salinity simulation in a large irrigation district in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Tang, Yikuan & Zhang, Fan & Wang, Sufen & Zhang, Xiaodong & Guo, Shanshan & Guo, Ping, 2019. "A distributed interval nonlinear multiobjective programming approach for optimal irrigation water management in an arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 13-26.
    10. Dai, C. & Cai, Y.P. & Li, Y.P. & Sun, W. & Wang, X.W. & Guo, H.C., 2014. "Optimal strategies for carbon capture, utilization and storage based on an inexact mλ-measure fuzzy chance-constrained programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 465-478.
    11. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Shanshan & Yue, Qing & Mao, Xiaomin & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Distributed AquaCrop simulation-nonlinear multi-objective dependent-chance programming for irrigation water resources management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Zhang, Chenglong & Engel, Bernard A. & Guo, Ping, 2018. "An Interval-based Fuzzy Chance-constrained Irrigation Water Allocation model with double-sided fuzziness," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 22-31.
    13. C. Dai & Y. Cai & Y. Liu & W. Wang & H. Guo, 2015. "A Generalized Interval Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Programming Method for Domestic Wastewater Management Under Uncertainty – A Case Study of Kunming, China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(9), pages 3015-3036, July.
    14. Chenglong Zhang & Qiong Yue & Ping Guo, 2019. "A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Xu, Xu & Jiang, Yao & Liu, Minghuan & Huang, Quanzhong & Huang, Guanhua, 2019. "Modeling and assessing agro-hydrological processes and irrigation water saving in the middle Heihe River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 152-164.
    16. Chongfeng Ren & Jiantao Yang & Hongbo Zhang, 2019. "An inexact fractional programming model for irrigation water resources optimal allocation under multiple uncertainties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Justyna Hachoł & Elżbieta Bondar-Nowakowska & Paweł S. Hachaj, 2019. "Application of Game Theory against Nature in the Assessment of Technical Solutions Used in River Regulation in the Context of Aquatic Plant Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Ren, Dongyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2019. "Hydrological complexities in irrigated agro-ecosystems with fragmented land cover types and shallow groundwater: Insights from a distributed hydrological modeling method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 868-881.
    19. Li, Jiang & Shang, Songhao & Jiang, Hongzhe & Song, Jian & Rahman, Khalil Ur & Adeloye, Adebayo J., 2021. "Simulation-based optimization for spatiotemporal allocation of irrigation water in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    20. Xiong, Lvyang & Xu, Xu & Engel, Bernard & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huang, Guanhua, 2021. "Predicting agroecosystem responses to identify appropriate water-saving management in arid irrigated regions with shallow groundwater: Realization on a regional scale," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:254:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.