IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aodasc/v8y2021i4d10.1007_s40745-020-00250-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted Tchebycheff Optimization Technique Under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Wasim Akram Mandal

    (Beldanga D.H.Sr.Madrasah)

Abstract

In a multi-objective optimization problem there is more than one objective function and there is no single optimal solution which simultaneously optimizes all of the given objective functions. For these unsuitable conditions the decision makers always search for the most ‘‘preferred’’ solution, in contrast to the optimal solution. A number of mathematical programming methods, namely Weighted-sum method, Goal programming, Lexicographic method, Weighted min–max method, Exponential weighted criterion, Weighted product method, Bounded objective function method and Weighted Tchebycheff optimization methods have been applied in the recent past to find the optimal solution. In this paper weighted Tchebycheff optimization methods has been applied to find the optimal solution of a multi-objective optimization problem. A solution procedure of weighted Tchebycheff technique has been discussed to find the optimal solution of the multi-objective optimization problems. For the most part, the parameters of a multi-objective optimization model are thought to be deterministic and settled. Nonetheless, the qualities watched for the parameters in true multi-objective optimization problems are frequently loose and subject to change. In this way, we utilize multi-objective optimization model inside a vulnerability based system and propose a multi-objective optimization model whose coefficients are uncertain in nature. We accept the uncertain variables (UVs) to have linear uncertainty distributions. Finally, a numerical example is solved weighted Tchebycheff technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Wasim Akram Mandal, 2021. "Weighted Tchebycheff Optimization Technique Under Uncertainty," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 709-731, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aodasc:v:8:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40745-020-00250-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s40745-020-00250-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40745-020-00250-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40745-020-00250-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1075-1078, September.
    2. Lin, Ming-Hua & Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2012. "Range reduction techniques for improving computational efficiency in global optimization of signomial geometric programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 17-25.
    3. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.
    4. Elmor Peterson, 2001. "The Fundamental Relations between Geometric Programming Duality, Parametric Programming Duality, and Ordinary Lagrangian Duality," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 109-153, July.
    5. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 243-265, July.
    6. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2006. "Posynomial geometric programming with parametric uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 345-353, January.
    7. Li, Shengguo & Peng, Jin & Zhang, Bo, 2013. "The uncertain premium principle based on the distortion function," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 317-324.
    8. Matthias Ehrgott, 2005. "Multicriteria Optimization," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-27659-3, February.
    9. Tsai, Jung-Fa & Lin, Ming-Hua & Hu, Yi-Chung, 2007. "On generalized geometric programming problems with non-positive variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 10-19, April.
    10. Yang, Hsu-Hao & Bricker, Dennis L., 1997. "Investigation of path-following algorithms for signomial geometric programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 230-241, November.
    11. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2008. "Posynomial geometric programming with interval exponents and coefficients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 17-27, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. R. Sherwani & Q. M. Ali, 2023. "Parametric Classification using Fuzzy Approach for Handling the Problem of Mixed Pixels in Ground Truth Data for a Satellite Image," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(6), pages 1459-1472, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Debora Di Caprio & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2016. "Solving Geometric Programming Problems with Normal, Linear and Zigzag Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 243-265, July.
    2. Wasim Akram Mandal & Sahidul Islam, 2017. "Multiobjective geometric programming problem under uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 85-109.
    3. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Salman Khodayifar & Panos M. Pardalos, 2021. "Copula theory approach to stochastic geometric programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 435-468, October.
    4. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2018. "Integrating geometric programming with rough set theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Belleh Fontem, 2023. "Robust Chance-Constrained Geometric Programming with Application to Demand Risk Mitigation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 765-797, May.
    6. G. S. Mahapatra & T. K. Mandal, 2012. "Posynomial Parametric Geometric Programming with Interval Valued Coefficient," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 120-132, July.
    7. Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2006. "Posynomial geometric programming with parametric uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 345-353, January.
    8. Yiduo Zhan & Qipeng P. Zheng & Chung-Li Tseng & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2018. "An accelerated extended cutting plane approach with piecewise linear approximations for signomial geometric programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 579-599, March.
    9. Tseng, Chung-Li & Zhan, Yiduo & Zheng, Qipeng P. & Kumar, Manish, 2015. "A MILP formulation for generalized geometric programming using piecewise-linear approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 360-370.
    10. Huang, Xiaoxia & Ma, Di & Choe, Kwang-Il, 2023. "Uncertain mean–variance portfolio model with inflation taking linear uncertainty distributions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 203-217.
    11. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Debora Di Caprio, 2017. "Fuzzy chance-constrained geometric programming: the possibility, necessity and credibility approaches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 67-97, April.
    12. Xu, Gongxian, 2014. "Global optimization of signomial geometric programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 500-510.
    13. Tingting Yang & Xiaoxia Huang, 2022. "A New Portfolio Optimization Model Under Tracking-Error Constraint with Linear Uncertainty Distributions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 723-747, November.
    14. Dennis L. Bricker & K. O. Kortanek, 2017. "Perfect Duality in Solving Geometric Programming Problems Under Uncertainty," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1055-1065, June.
    15. Jiao, Hongwei & Liu, Sanyang & Lu, Nan, 2015. "A parametric linear relaxation algorithm for globally solving nonconvex quadratic programming," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 973-985.
    16. Yichen Lu & Chao Yang & Jun Yang, 2022. "A multi-objective humanitarian pickup and delivery vehicle routing problem with drones," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 291-353, December.
    17. Fritz Bökler & Henning Jasper, 2024. "Complexity of the multiobjective minimum weight minimum stretch spanner problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 100(1), pages 65-83, August.
    18. Wu, Weitiao & Lin, Yue & Liu, Ronghui & Jin, Wenzhou, 2022. "The multi-depot electric vehicle scheduling problem with power grid characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 322-347.
    19. Hughes, Michael S. & Lunday, Brian J. & Weir, Jeffrey D. & Hopkinson, Kenneth M., 2021. "The multiple shortest path problem with path deconfliction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 818-829.
    20. Martins, C.L. & Pato, M.V., 2024. "Decomposition heuristics for multiobjective problems. The Food bank network redesign case," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aodasc:v:8:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s40745-020-00250-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.