IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v31y2021i1p41-59id1557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Azarnoosh Kafi
  • Behrouz Daneshian
  • Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a well-known method that based on inputs and outputs calculates the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). Comparing the efficiency and ranking of DMUs in different periods lets the decision-makers prevent any loss in the productivity of units and improve the production planning. Despite the merits of DEA models, they are not able to forecast the efficiency of future periods with known input/output records of the DMUs. With this end in view, this study aims at proposing a forecasting algorithm with a 95% confidence interval to generate fuzzy data sets for future periods. Moreover, managers’ opinions are inserted in the proposed forecasting model. Equipped with the forecasted data sets and concerning the data sets from earlier periods, this model can rightly forecast the efficiency of the future periods. The proposed procedure also employs the simple geometric mean to discriminate between efficient units. Examples from a real case including 20 automobile firms show the applicability of the proposed algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:31:y:2021:i:1:p:41-59:id:1557
    DOI: 10.37190/ord210103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/1557%20-%20published.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37190/ord210103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    3. Fildes, Robert & Wei, Yingqi & Ismail, Suzilah, 2011. "Evaluating the forecasting performance of econometric models of air passenger traffic flows using multiple error measures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 902-922, July.
    4. O. B. Olesen & N. C. Petersen, 1995. "Chance Constrained Efficiency Evaluation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 442-457, March.
    5. Liang Liang & Jie Wu & Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu, 2008. "The DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model and Its Nash Equilibrium," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1278-1288, October.
    6. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1962. "Programming with linear fractional functionals," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3‐4), pages 181-186, September.
    7. Liang, Liang & Wu, Jie & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2008. "Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 1025-1030, June.
    8. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    9. Barak, Sasan & Dahooei, Jalil Heidary, 2018. "A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 134-149.
    10. Lim, Dong-Joon & Anderson, Timothy R. & Inman, Oliver Lane, 2014. "Choosing effective dates from multiple optima in Technology Forecasting using Data Envelopment Analysis (TFDEA)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 91-97.
    11. Xu, Bing & Ouenniche, Jamal, 2012. "A data envelopment analysis-based framework for the relative performance evaluation of competing crude oil prices' volatility forecasting models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 576-583.
    12. Wang, Ying-Ming & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2010. "Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 332-338, November.
    13. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1959. "Chance-Constrained Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 73-79, October.
    14. Lim, Dong-Joon & Anderson, Timothy R. & Shott, Tom, 2015. "Technological forecasting of supercomputer development: The March to Exascale computing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 128-135.
    15. Emrouznejad, Ali & Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Petridis, Konstantinos, 2016. "A novel ranking procedure for forecasting approaches using Data Envelopment Analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 235-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31, pages 41-59.
    2. Cui, Yuan & Pan, Hao & Huang, Yi-Di & Yang, Guo-liang, 2024. "How can sociological theories provide legitimacy to eco-efficiency evaluations? Embark on a journey toward understanding," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud & Nia, Vahid Partovi, 2019. "Stochastic ranking and dominance in DEA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 125-138.
    4. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2023. "Foundations of operations research: From linear programming to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1069-1080.
    5. Sun, Qinghe & Chen, Li & Meng, Qiang, 2022. "Evaluating port efficiency dynamics: A risk-based approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 333-347.
    6. Ebrahimi, Bohlool & Dhamotharan, Lalitha & Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Charles, Vincent, 2022. "A cross-inefficiency approach based on the deviation variables framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Jianhui Xie & Qiwei Xie & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang, 2021. "Solving data envelopment analysis models with sum-of-fractional objectives: a global optimal approach based on the multiparametric disaggregation technique," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 453-480, September.
    8. Jie Wu & Lulu Shen & Ganggang Zhang & Zhixiang Zhou & Qingyuan Zhu, 2024. "Efficiency evaluation with data uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1379-1403, August.
    9. Wenli Liu & Ying-Ming Wang & Shulong Lv, 2017. "An aggressive game cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 241-258, December.
    10. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    11. Xiang Ji & Jiasen Sun & Qunwei Wang & Qianqian Yuan, 2019. "Revealing Energy Over-Consumption and Pollutant Over-Emission Behind GDP: A New Multi-criteria Sustainable Measure," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 1391-1421, December.
    12. Soltanifar, Mehdi & Shahghobadi, Saeid, 2013. "Selecting a benevolent secondary goal model in data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation by a voting model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 65-74.
    13. Huang, Zhimin & Li, Susan X., 1996. "Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 390-403, December.
    14. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    15. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud, 2021. "On Pareto-optimality in the cross-efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 247-257.
    16. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Emrouznejad, Ali & Sklavos, Sokratis, 2019. "A Bayesian approach for correcting bias of data envelopment analysis estimators," MPRA Paper 91886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Mehdi Toloo & Mona Barat & Atefeh Masoumzadeh, 2015. "Selective measures in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 623-642, March.
    19. Li, Susan X., 1998. "Stochastic models and variable returns to scales in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 532-548, February.
    20. Yang, Feng & Ang, Sheng & Xia, Qiong & Yang, Chenchen, 2012. "Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 483-488.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:31:y:2021:i:1:p:41-59:id:1557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.