IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v93y2018i1d10.1007_s11069-017-3069-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GIS framework for evaluating the implications of urban road network failure due to earthquakes: Bucharest (Romania) case study

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos Toma-Danila

    (National Institute for Earth Physics
    University of Bucharest)

Abstract

Through this paper we propose and test a GIS framework that addresses the issue of seismic risk due to urban road network failure. The approach relies on full GIS integration, on Monte Carlo simulations for generating potentially disrupted network configurations, considering also the damage probability due to direct earthquake implications, and on traffic considerations (both in typical and post-earthquake situations). The damage probability can be obtained using fragility functions for critical structures like bridges and tunnels or by determining empirically the possibility of affected buildings to generate debris leading to road obstruction. Multiple performance indicators such as travel time and distance under various conditions are combined, in order to quantify the risks inflicted by dysfunctionalities in the emergency intervention process. The framework considers at the same time temporal and spatial dimensions, being able to cope with traffic dynamics or reconfigurable network configurations. The ArcGIS Network Analyst Module is used for model integration, and full city scale analysis is performed in order to test the capabilities. Bucharest (capital of Romania) is selected for the case study; this 2 million inhabitant city is one of the most endangered in Europe, due to earthquakes that occur in the Vrancea Area, at intermediate depth, with moment magnitudes > 7, but also due to the vulnerable building stock. Beside this, it is one of Europe’s top cities when it comes to traffic congestion. The results of the study provide initial insights on the deficiencies of the city’s road network and connectivity limitations, showing the high impact of road obstructions and traffic congestion on intervention times, for ambulances and firefighters, in case of an earthquake.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos Toma-Danila, 2018. "A GIS framework for evaluating the implications of urban road network failure due to earthquakes: Bucharest (Romania) case study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 97-111, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:93:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-3069-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-017-3069-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-017-3069-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-017-3069-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bono, Flavio & Gutiérrez, Eugenio, 2011. "A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: the case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1443-1455.
    2. Panjamani Anbazhagan & Sushma Srinivas & Deepu Chandran, 2012. "Classification of road damage due to earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 425-460, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aakil M. Caunhye & Nazli Yonca Aydin & H. Sebnem Duzgun, 2020. "Robust post-disaster route restoration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 1055-1087, December.
    2. Yu, Yun-Chi & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Predicting road blockage due to building damage following earthquakes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Yun-Chi & Gardoni, Paolo, 2022. "Predicting road blockage due to building damage following earthquakes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Yamada, Takashi, 2022. "Generalizing the probability of reaching a destination in case of route blockage," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    3. Bíl, Michal & Vodák, Rostislav & Kubeček, Jan & Bílová, Martina & Sedoník, Jiří, 2015. "Evaluating road network damage caused by natural disasters in the Czech Republic between 1997 and 2010," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 90-103.
    4. Suwan Shen & Xi Feng & Zhong Ren Peng, 2016. "A framework to analyze vulnerability of critical infrastructure to climate change: the case of a coastal community in Florida," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 589-609, October.
    5. Masahiro Sasabe & Kodai Fujii & Shoji Kasahara, 2020. "Road network risk analysis considering people flow under ordinary and evacuation situations," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(5), pages 759-774, June.
    6. Michal Bíl & Jan Kubeček & Richard Andrášik, 2014. "An epidemiological approach to determining the risk of road damage due to landslides," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1323-1335, September.
    7. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    8. Dan He & Zhijing Sun & Peng Gao, 2019. "Development of Economic Integration in the Central Yangtze River Megaregion from the Perspective of Urban Network Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Victor Cantillo & Luis F. Macea & Miguel Jaller, 2019. "Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 243-273, March.
    10. Freiria, Susana & Ribeiro, Bernardete & Tavares, Alexandre O., 2015. "Understanding road network dynamics: Link-based topological patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-66.
    11. Juan Carlos García-Palomares & Javier Gutiérrez & Juan Carlos Martín & Borja Moya-Gómez, 2018. "An analysis of the Spanish high capacity road network criticality," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1139-1159, July.
    12. Bhandari, Pratik & Creighton, Douglas & Gong, Jinzhe & Boyle, Carol & Law, Kris M.Y., 2023. "Evolution of cyber-physical-human water systems: Challenges and gaps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    13. Widodo Pawirodikromo, 2020. "Middle value ground acceleration map and site effect in the Merapi sedimentary basin under the 2006 Yogyakarta, Indonesia earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(1), pages 419-443, May.
    14. Thomas W. Nicolai & Kai Nagel, 2014. "High resolution accessibility computations," Chapters, in: Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Aura Reggiani & Javier Gutiérrez (ed.), Accessibility and Spatial Interaction, chapter 4, pages 62-91, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Coutinho-Rodrigues, João & Tralhão, Lino & Alçada-Almeida, Luís, 2012. "Solving a location-routing problem with a multiobjective approach: the design of urban evacuation plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 206-218.
    16. Amir Al Hamdi Redzuan & Rozana Zakaria & Aznah Nor Anuar & Eeydzah Aminudin & Norbazlan Mohd Yusof, 2022. "Road Network Vulnerability Based on Diversion Routes to Reconnect Disrupted Road Segments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Johanna Guth & Sven Wursthorn & Andreas Ch. Braun & Sina Keller, 2019. "Development of a generic concept to analyze the accessibility of emergency facilities in critical road infrastructure for disaster scenarios: exemplary application for the 2017 wildfires in Chile and ," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 979-999, July.
    18. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    19. Balijepalli, Chandra & Oppong, Olivia, 2014. "Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 145-155.
    20. Ahmad Mohamad El-Maissi & Sotirios A. Argyroudis & Fadzli Mohamed Nazri, 2020. "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:93:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-017-3069-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.