IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aes324/345985.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Spatial Analysis Of The Robustness Of The “Private Kill†Abattoir Network In The UK: A Proof Of Concept Study

Author

Listed:
  • Franks, Jeremy R.
  • Hepburn, Jessica
  • Peden, Rachel

Abstract

Long-term trend in the closure of abattoir businesses has reduced “private kill†provision across the UK, leading to longer and more complex livestock journeys - jeopardising animal welfare, and threatening the viability of the locally-finished and -slaughtered red meat supply chain. This “proof of concept†study uses farmer and abattoir survey data, GIS software and Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the impacts of possible further closures of private kill abattoirs on the robustness of the private kill network. In August 2020, we estimate 18% of the UK was further than 45kms from a private kill abattoir, while 21% was serviced by one, 14% by two and 47% by three or more abattoirs. We estimate the robustness of the private kill network by calculating the size of these areas in turn should 9% or 18% of the existing private kill abattoirs stop operating. In both scenarios the area further than 45km from a private kill service, and with one and two providers increased, while the area with three or more providers decreased. The discussion considers additional information needed to allow this methodology a become a useful tool for supporting the private kill network by providing support to strategically located abattoir businesses within the overarching network of private kill businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Franks, Jeremy R. & Hepburn, Jessica & Peden, Rachel, 2022. "A Spatial Analysis Of The Robustness Of The “Private Kill†Abattoir Network In The UK: A Proof Of Concept Study," Agricultural Economics Society (AES) 98th Annual Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, March 18-20, 2024 345985, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aes324:345985
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345985/files/a_spatial_analysis_of_the_robustness_of_the_private_kill_abattoir_network_in_the_uk_a_proof_of_concept_study.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aes324:345985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.aes.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.