IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v66y2013i2p939-953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential loading damage to industrial storage tanks due to volcanic ash fallout

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Milazzo
  • Giuseppa Ancione
  • Anna Basco
  • David Lister
  • Ernesto Salzano
  • Giuseppe Maschio

Abstract

The phenomenon of volcanic fallout ash from Mt. Etna in Sicily (Italy) is well known and frequent in recent years, as in the period 2001–2004. As a consequence, significant problems for the population, road, rail and air traffic and production activities have occurred. The industrial areas of Catania and Augusta-Priolo, located in south eastern Sicily, might be involved during particular weather conditions. This paper aims at determining the potential scenarios of damage to industrial facilities caused by volcanic ash fallout. The work has been focused on the study of both fixed and floating roof storage tanks, containing flammable liquids, and examines extreme failures damage causing the greatest loss of containment for these facilities. To include scenarios arising from natural phenomena (Na-Tech events) in the standard risk assessment procedure, the estimation of the vulnerability of these facilities is necessary. The study has been applied to the area surrounding Mt. Etna, and the procedure can also be extended to other case studies. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Milazzo & Giuseppa Ancione & Anna Basco & David Lister & Ernesto Salzano & Giuseppe Maschio, 2013. "Potential loading damage to industrial storage tanks due to volcanic ash fallout," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 939-953, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:939-953
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0518-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-012-0518-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-012-0518-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Steinberg & Hatice Sengul & Ana Cruz, 2008. "Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 46(2), pages 143-152, August.
    2. Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Aven, Terje, 2012. "An extended risk assessment approach for chemical plants applied to a study related to pipe ruptures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 183-192.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rossi, Lorenzo & Casson Moreno, Valeria & Landucci, Gabriele, 2022. "Vulnerability assessment of process pipelines affected by flood events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Necci, Amos & Argenti, Francesca & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2014. "Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 30-46.
    3. Antonioni, Giacomo & Landucci, Gabriele & Necci, Amos & Gheorghiu, Diana & Cozzani, Valerio, 2015. "Quantitative assessment of risk due to NaTech scenarios caused by floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 334-345.
    4. Olivar, Oscar J. Ramírez & Mayorga, Santiago Zuluaga & Giraldo, Felipe Muñoz & Sánchez-Silva, Mauricio & Pinelli, Jean-Paul & Salzano, Ernesto, 2020. "The effects of extreme winds on atmospheric storage tanks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Khakzad, Nima & Van Gelder, Pieter, 2018. "Vulnerability of industrial plants to flood-induced natechs: A Bayesian network approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 403-411.
    6. Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Ancione, Giuseppa & Salzano, Ernesto & Maschio, Giuseppe, 2013. "Risks associated with volcanic ash fallout from Mt.Etna with reference to industrial filtration systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 106-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiezhong Liu & Hubo Zhang & Xiaowei Li & Haiyan Li, 2017. "Effects of organization factors on flood-related Natechs in urban areas of China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 355-365, August.
    2. Anamaria Bukvic, 2015. "Integrated framework for the Relocation Potential Assessment of Coastal Communities (RPACC): application to Hurricane Sandy-affected areas," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 264-278, June.
    3. Wang, Tai-Ran & Mousseau, Vincent & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "An empirical classification-based framework for the safety criticality assessment of energy production systems, in presence of inconsistent data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 139-151.
    4. Burgherr, Peter & Eckle, Petrissa & Hirschberg, Stefan, 2012. "Comparative assessment of severe accident risks in the coal, oil and natural gas chains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 97-103.
    5. Tai–ran Wang & Vincent Mousseau & Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio, 2015. "Assessing the Performance of a Classification‐Based Vulnerability Analysis Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(9), pages 1674-1689, September.
    6. Ricci, Federica & Yang, Ming & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2024. "Emergency response in cascading scenarios triggered by natural events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Daniel Suarez & Camilo Gomez & Andrés L. Medaglia & Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei & Sthefania Grajales, 2024. "Integrated Decision Support for Disaster Risk Management: Aiding Preparedness and Response Decisions in Wildfire Management," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 609-628, June.
    8. Ana Cruz & Elisabeth Krausmann, 2013. "Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to climate change and extreme weather events," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 41-53, November.
    9. Hatice Şengül & Dilem Marşan & Tuğçe Gün, 2019. "Survey assessment of organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 470-486, June.
    10. Emilio Palazzi & Fabio Currò & Bruno Fabiano, 2013. "Accidental Continuous Releases from Coal Processing in Semi-Confined Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Nicholas Santella & Laura J. Steinberg & Gloria Andrea Aguirra, 2011. "Empirical Estimation of the Conditional Probability of Natech Events Within the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 951-968, June.
    12. Samantha M. Samon & Diana Rohlman & Lane G. Tidwell & Peter D. Hoffman & Abiodun O. Oluyomi & Kim A. Anderson, 2022. "Associating Increased Chemical Exposure to Hurricane Harvey in a Longitudinal Panel Using Silicone Wristbands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Montewka, Jakub & Goerlandt, Floris & Kujala, Pentti, 2014. "On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 77-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:66:y:2013:i:2:p:939-953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.