IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i3p470-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survey assessment of organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Hatice Åžengül
  • Dilem MarÅŸan
  • Tuğçe Gün

Abstract

Organizational resilience is vital for long-term value creation in organizations, as they continuously face many obstacles due to fast evolving, complex, and uncertain environments. Resilience is also important for managing hazmat and oil spill risks, given the expected increase in frequency and magnitude of natural disasters due to climatic extremes. Organizations with higher resiliency potential are more likely to manage these challenges effectively. Recently developing literature indicates that development of dynamic capabilities, which are different from ordinary capabilities, leads to greater organizational resiliency potential. This study assesses organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey via a 5-point Likert-type-scale survey designed toward measuring four important dimensions of dynamic capabilities including anticipation capabilities, adaptive culture, networking capabilities, and organizational learning. Cluster analysis of survey results revealed that there are significant differences in organizational resiliency potential among organizations, as evidenced by the distance plot. While participating organizations have scored relatively high resiliency potentials, there are areas that need improvement including increasing anticipation and networking capabilities and strengthening employee engagement to further enhance resilience of organizations. In the second phase of the study, the effect of three factors on organizational resiliency potential that includes socioeconomic level and earthquake risk of the region that the organization is located, and Seveso Directive status of the organization were assessed. While organizational resiliency potential scores among groups of organizations that fall under different categories for these three factors did not show any statistically significant difference, follow-up focused interview revealed that respondents believed there may be differences in resiliency potential. Both survey and follow-up focused interview assessments showed the complexity and multiple aspects involved in developing adequate organizational resiliency potential. Organizational resiliency potential research is still in its infancy and both theoretical and technical sides of the equation requires further development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hatice Åžengül & Dilem MarÅŸan & Tuğçe Gün, 2019. "Survey assessment of organizational resiliency potential of a group of Seveso organizations in Turkey," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 470-486, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:470-486
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18802655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18802655
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18802655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Steinberg & Hatice Sengul & Ana Cruz, 2008. "Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 46(2), pages 143-152, August.
    2. Truss, Catherine & Shantz, Amanda & Soane, Emma & Alfes, Kerstin & Delbridge, Rick, 2013. "Employee engagement, organisational performance and individual well-being: exploring the evidence, developing the theory," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 50911, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Torabi, S.A. & Mansouri, S.A., 2015. "Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilienceAuthor-Name: Sahebjamnia, N," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 261-273.
    4. Rubinstein, Saul & Martin-Rios, Carlos & Erhardt, Niclas & Hoffer Gittell, Jody & George, Varghese P., 2016. "Organizational responses to uncertainty in the airline industry: Changes in patterns of communication networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 217-227.
    5. Scira Menoni & Daniela Molinari & Dennis Parker & Francesco Ballio & Sue Tapsell, 2012. "Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(3), pages 2057-2082, December.
    6. Mendonça, David & Wallace, William A., 2015. "Factors underlying organizational resilience: The case of electric power restoration in New York City after 11 September 2001," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 83-91.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, 2006. "Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 514-524, August.
    8. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Monika Winn, 2012. "Extreme Weather Events and the Critical Importance of Anticipatory Adaptation and Organizational Resilience in Responding to Impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 17-32, January.
    9. Pal, Rudrajeet & Torstensson, Håkan & Mattila, Heikki, 2014. "Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises—an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 410-428.
    10. Sabrina Larkin & Cate Fox-Lent & Daniel A. Eisenberg & Benjamin D. Trump & Sean Wallace & Colin Chadderton & Igor Linkov, 2015. "Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 185-195, June.
    11. Alessandra Tognazzo & Paolo Gubitta & Saverio Dave Favaron, 2016. "Does slack always affect resilience? A study of quasi-medium-sized Italian firms," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(9-10), pages 768-790, October.
    12. repec:eme:ijmpps:v:34:y:2013:i:1:p:271-287 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Ann P. Bartel & Nancy D. Beaulieu & Ciaran S. Phibbs & Patricia W. Stone, 2014. "Human Capital and Productivity in a Team Environment: Evidence from the Healthcare Sector," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 231-259, April.
    14. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    15. Yair Friedman & Abraham Carmeli & Asher Tishler, 2016. "How CEOs and TMTs Build Adaptive Capacity in Small Entrepreneurial Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 996-1018, September.
    16. Alfes, Kerstin & Shantz, Amanda & Truss, Catherine & Soane, Emma, 2013. "The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 42345, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Stefan Zagelmeyer & Markus Heckmann, 2013. "Flexibility and crisis resistance: quantitative evidence for German establishments," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 271-287, June.
    18. Slavko Arsovski & Goran Putnik & Zora Arsovski & Danijela Tadic & Aleksandar Aleksic & Aleksandar Djordjevic & Slavisa Moljevic, 2015. "Modelling and Enhancement of Organizational Resilience Potential in Process Industry SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Hillmann, 2021. "Disciplines of organizational resilience: contributions, critiques, and future research avenues," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 879-936, May.
    2. Conz, Elisa & Magnani, Giovanna, 2020. "A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 400-412.
    3. Nay Chi Khin Khin Oo & Sirisuhk Rakthin, 2022. "Integrative Review of Absorptive Capacity’s Role in Fostering Organizational Resilience and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Cheng Mei Tung, 2018. "Vertical integration for smart manufacturing-The dynamic capability perspective," Journal of Advances in Technology and Engineering Research, A/Professor Akbar A. Khatibi, vol. 4(2), pages 70-78.
    5. Jesse M. Keenan, 2018. "Regional resilience trust funds: an exploratory analysis for leveraging insurance surcharges," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 118-139, March.
    6. Riccardo Vecchiato & Giampiero Favato & Francesco di Maddaloni & Hang Do, 2020. "Foresight, cognition, and long‐term performance: Insights from the automotive industry and opportunities for future research," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), March.
    7. Henry He Huang & Joseph Kerstein & Chong Wang & Feng (Harry) Wu, 2022. "Firm climate risk, risk management, and bank loan financing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(13), pages 2849-2880, December.
    8. Yanina Rashkova & Ludovica Moi & Francesca Cabiddu, 2024. "Addressing the Societal Challenges in Organizations: The Conceptualization of Mindfulness Capability for Social Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 249-268, January.
    9. Sahebjamnia, Navid & Torabi, S. Ali & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2018. "Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-83.
    10. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Srivastava, Gautam & Chan, Hau-Ling & Bryde, David J., 2022. "The role of big data and predictive analytics in developing a resilient supply chain network in the South African mining industry against extreme weather events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    11. Katsumata, Sotaro & Nishimoto, Akihiro & Kannan, P.K., 2023. "Brand competitiveness and resilience to exogenous shock: Usage of smartphone apps during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Stephanie Duchek, 2020. "Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 215-246, April.
    13. Yasangi Anuradha Iddagoda & Henarath H. D. N. P. Opatha, 2020. "Relationships and Mediating Effects of Employee Engagement: An Empirical Study of Managerial Employees of Sri Lankan Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, April.
    14. Chowdhury, Md Maruf H. & Quaddus, Mohammed, 2017. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 185-204.
    15. Desalegn A. Gugissa & Paul T.M. Ingenbleek & Hans C.M. van Trijp & Mebrahtu L. Teklehaimanot & Workneh K. Tessema, 2021. "When natural resources run out, market knowledge steps in: Lessons on natural resource deployment from a longitudinal study in a resource‐scarce region of Ethiopia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1598-1609, May.
    16. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Xiaoming He & Yaqun Yi & Zelong Wei, 2019. "New product development capabilities in China: the moderating role of TMT cooperative behavior," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 73-97, April.
    18. Andres Felipe Cortes & Andreea N. Kiss, 2023. "Is managerial discretion high in small firms? A theoretical framework," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 157-172, January.
    19. Tomasz Ingram & Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala & Karel Hlaváček, 2023. "Organizational Resilience as a Response to the Energy Crisis: Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-35, January.
    20. Lauri Haapanen & Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen & Jan Hermes, 2018. "FIRM FUNCTIONS AND THE NATURE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN INTERNATIONALIZING SMEs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-30, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:3:p:470-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.