IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v119y2023i1d10.1007_s11069-023-06124-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal distribution model and occurrence probability of M ≥ 6.5 earthquakes in North China Seismic Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Weijin Xu

    (China Earthquake Administration)

  • Jian Wu

    (China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center)

  • Mengtan Gao

    (China Earthquake Administration)

Abstract

The temporal distribution of earthquakes provides important basis for earthquake prediction and seismic hazard analysis. The relatively limited records of strong earthquakes have often made it difficult to study the temporal distribution models of regional strong earthquakes. However, there are hundreds of years of complete strong earthquake records in the North China Seismic Zone, providing abundant basic data for studying temporal distribution models. Using the data of M ≥ 6.5 earthquakes in North China as inputs, this paper estimates the model parameters using the maximum likelihood method with Poisson, Gamma, Weibull, Lognormal and Brownian passage time (BPT) distributions as target models. The optimal model for describing the temporal distribution of earthquakes is determined according to Akaike information criterion (AIC),and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (K–S test). The results show that Lognormal and BPT models perform better in describing the temporal distribution of strong earthquakes in North China. The mean recurrence periods of strong earthquakes (M ≥ 6.5) calculated based on these two models are 8.1 years and 13.2 years, respectively. In addition, we used the likelihood profile method to estimate the uncertainty of model parameters. For the BPT model, the mean and 95% confidence interval of recurrence interval μ is 13.2 (8.9–19.1) years, and the mean and 95% confidence interval of α is 1.29 (1.0–1.78). For the Lognormal model, the mean value and 95% confidence interval of v is 2.09 (1.68–2.49), the mean value exp (v) corresponding to earthquake recurrence interval is 8.1 (5.4–12.1) years. In this study, we also calculated the occurrence probability of M ≥ 6.5 earthquakes in the North China Seismic Zone in the future, and found that the probability and 95% confidence interval in the next 10 years based on the BPT model is 35.3% (26.8%-44.9%); the mean value and 95% confidence interval of earthquake occurrence probability based on the Lognormal distribution is 35.4% (22.9%-49.7%); the mean probability and 95% confidence interval based on the Poisson model is 53.1% (41.1%-64%). The results of this study may provide important reference for temporal distribution model selection and earthquake recurrence period calculation in future seismic hazard analysis in North China.

Suggested Citation

  • Weijin Xu & Jian Wu & Mengtan Gao, 2023. "Temporal distribution model and occurrence probability of M ≥ 6.5 earthquakes in North China Seismic Zone," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 125-141, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:119:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06124-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06124-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06124-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06124-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yosihiko Ogata, 1998. "Space-Time Point-Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 50(2), pages 379-402, June.
    2. Zhuang J. & Ogata Y. & Vere-Jones D., 2002. "Stochastic Declustering of Space-Time Earthquake Occurrences," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 369-380, June.
    3. Sumanta Pasari & Onkar Dikshit, 2018. "Stochastic earthquake interevent time modeling from exponentiated Weibull distributions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(2), pages 823-842, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van den Hengel, G. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2018. "Forecasting social conflicts in Africa using an Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence model," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-31, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    3. Gilian van den Hengel & Philip Hans Franses, 2020. "Forecasting Social Conflicts in Africa Using an Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence Model," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Nader Davoudi & Hamid Reza Tavakoli & Mehdi Zare & Abdollah Jalilian, 2020. "Aftershock probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bushehr province in Iran using ETAS model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(3), pages 1159-1170, February.
    5. Roba Bairakdar & Debbie Dupuis & Melina Mailhot, 2024. "Deviance Voronoi Residuals for Space-Time Point Process Models: An Application to Earthquake Insurance Risk," Papers 2410.04369, arXiv.org.
    6. Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2021. "Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 947-971, September.
    7. Gresnigt, Francine & Kole, Erik & Franses, Philip Hans, 2015. "Interpreting financial market crashes as earthquakes: A new Early Warning System for medium term crashes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 123-139.
    8. Baichuan Yuan & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2021. "Fast estimation of multivariate spatiotemporal Hawkes processes and network reconstruction," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(6), pages 1127-1152, December.
    9. Rachele Foschi & Francesca Lilla & Cecilia Mancini, 2020. "Warnings about future jumps: properties of the exponential Hawkes model," Working Papers 13/2020, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    10. D. Gospodinov & V. Karakostas & E. Papadimitriou, 2015. "Seismicity rate modeling for prospective stochastic forecasting: the case of 2014 Kefalonia, Greece, seismic excitation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1039-1058, November.
    11. Huang, Lorick & Khabou, Mahmoud, 2023. "Nonlinear Poisson autoregression and nonlinear Hawkes processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 201-241.
    12. Steffen Volkenand & Günther Filler & Martin Odening, 2020. "Price Discovery and Market Reflexivity in Agricultural Futures Contracts with Different Maturities," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Dewei Wang & Chendi Jiang & Chanseok Park, 2019. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing systems with memory," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 341-360, April.
    14. Jamie Olson & Kathleen Carley, 2013. "Exact and approximate EM estimation of mutually exciting hawkes processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 63-80, April.
    15. Kuroda, Kaori & Hashiguchi, Hiroki & Fujiwara, Kantaro & Ikeguchi, Tohru, 2014. "Reconstruction of network structures from marked point processes using multi-dimensional scaling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 194-204.
    16. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    17. Habtemicael, Semere & SenGupta, Indranil, 2014. "Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes for geophysical data analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 399(C), pages 147-156.
    18. Ying Song & Harvey Miller, 2012. "Exploring traffic flow databases using space-time plots and data cubes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 215-234, March.
    19. Hainaut, Donatien, 2019. "Fractional Hawkes processes," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019016, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Eric W. Fox & Martin B. Short & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Kathryn D. Coronges & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2016. "Modeling E-mail Networks and Inferring Leadership Using Self-Exciting Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 564-584, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:119:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06124-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.