IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v108y2021i1d10.1007_s11069-021-04718-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Salehpour Jam

    (Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI))

  • Jamal Mosaffaie

    (Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI))

  • Faramarz Sarfaraz

    (Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO))

  • Samad Shadfar

    (Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI))

  • Rouhangiz Akhtari

    (Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute (SCWMRI))

Abstract

Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the integrated index method (IIM), AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in the Alamut watershed, Iran. Ten causal layers including slope angle, slope aspect, rainfall, lithology, altitude, land use, and the most common distance maps including distance to fault, distance to stream, and distance to road were used to produce LSMs. Meanwhile, the landslide distribution map was used to evaluate the accuracy of the produced LSMs. The weights of the causal factors were also calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method based on the viewpoints of 14 experts. Finally, the quality sum (Qs) index as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the performance of the MCDM models. The Qs values for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.355, 0.903, and 0.703, respectively. Therefore, IIM and AHP-VIKOR methods are more efficient than AHP-TOPSIS to create LSM. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the ROC curves for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.784, 0.853, and 0.844, respectively. Therefore, the accuracy of the MCDM models is acceptable for TOPSIS and excellent for IIM and AHP-VIKOR. In general, results of the performance assessment of MCDM models indicated the good performance of the models to produce LSMs, so that the IIM was introduced as the best model. Also, the performance of IIM and AHP-VIKOR are more than the AHP-TOPSIS model to produce LSMs. Overall, the application of the AHP method in combination with other MCDM models as a hybrid model to produce LSMs is recommended under the principles of group decision-making in AHP for land-use planning and landslide risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Salehpour Jam & Jamal Mosaffaie & Faramarz Sarfaraz & Samad Shadfar & Rouhangiz Akhtari, 2021. "GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 1025-1046, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04718-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    2. Tirthankar Basu & Swades Pal, 2020. "A GIS-based factor clustering and landslide susceptibility analysis using AHP for Gish River Basin, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4787-4819, June.
    3. Gökçe Hasekioğulları & Murat Ercanoglu, 2012. "A new approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 1157-1179, September.
    4. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    5. Majid Roodposhti & Saeed Rahimi & Mansour Beglou, 2014. "PROMETHEE II and fuzzy AHP: an enhanced GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 77-95, August.
    6. H. Pourghasemi & H. Moradi & S. Fatemi Aghda, 2013. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 749-779, October.
    7. Hamid Pourghasemi & Biswajeet Pradhan & Candan Gokceoglu, 2012. "Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 965-996, September.
    8. Mosaffaie, Jamal & Salehpour Jam, Amin & Tabatabaei, Mahmoud Reza & Kousari, Mahammad Reza, 2021. "Trend assessment of the watershed health based on DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Vahedberdi Sheikh & Aiding Kornejady & Majid Ownegh, 2019. "Application of the coupled TOPSIS–Mahalanobis distance for multi-hazard-based management of the target districts of the Golestan Province, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 1335-1365, April.
    10. Ali Yalcin & Fikri Bulut, 2007. "Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and digital photogrammetric techniques: a case study from Ardesen (NE-Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(1), pages 201-226, April.
    11. N. Sabatakakis & G. Koukis & E. Vassiliades & S. Lainas, 2013. "Landslide susceptibility zonation in Greece," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 523-543, January.
    12. Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili & Turan Erden & Himmet Karaman, 2018. "Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1523-1546, July.
    13. Jason Papathanasiou & Nikolaos Ploskas, 2018. "Multiple Criteria Decision Aid," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, number 978-3-319-91648-4, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahdi Bitarafan & Kambod Amini Hosseini & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani, 2023. "Evaluating Natural Hazards in Cities Using a Novel Integrated MCDM Approach (Case Study: Tehran City)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Masanori Kohno & Yuki Higuchi & Yusuke Ono, 2023. "Evaluating earthquake-induced widespread slope failure hazards using an AHP-GIS combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1485-1512, March.
    3. Idris Bello Yamusa & Mohd Suhaili Ismail & Abdulwaheed Tella, 2022. "Highway Proneness Appraisal to Landslides along Taiping to Ipoh Segment Malaysia, Using MCDM and GIS Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Jonmenjoy Barman & Brototi Biswas & K. Srinivasa Rao, 2024. "A hybrid integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) for landslide susceptibility zonation of Aizawl, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8571-8596, July.
    5. Ran Wang & Hao Lin & Jinhua Cheng & Zixi Xu & Haoying Feng & Yameng Tang, 2022. "Optimizing the Water Ecological Environment of Mining Cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Using the Cloud Model, CV-TOPSIS, and Coupling Coordination Degree," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Zohre Hoseinzade & Asal Zavarei & Kourosh Shirani, 2021. "Application of prediction–area plot in the assessment of MCDM methods through VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, and permutation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2489-2507, December.
    7. Hui Shang & Sihang Liu & Jiaxin Zhong & Paraskevas Tsangaratos & Ioanna Ilia & Wei Chen & Yunzhi Chen & Yang Liu, 2024. "Application of Naive Bayes, kernel logistic regression and alternation decision tree for landslide susceptibility mapping in Pengyang County, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 12043-12079, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masanori Kohno & Yuki Higuchi & Yusuke Ono, 2023. "Evaluating earthquake-induced widespread slope failure hazards using an AHP-GIS combination," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1485-1512, March.
    2. Silvana Moragues & María Gabriela Lenzano & Mario Lanfri & Stella Moreiras & Esteban Lannutti & Luis Lenzano, 2021. "Analytic hierarchy process applied to landslide susceptibility mapping of the North Branch of Argentino Lake, Argentina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 915-941, January.
    3. Gökhan Demir & Mustafa Aytekin & Aykut Akgün & Sabriye İkizler & Orhan Tatar, 2013. "A comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and analytic hierarchy process methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 1481-1506, February.
    4. Rui-Xuan Tang & E-Chuan Yan & Tao Wen & Xiao-Meng Yin & Wei Tang, 2021. "Comparison of Logistic Regression, Information Value, and Comprehensive Evaluating Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, March.
    5. G. Sakkas & I. Misailidis & N. Sakellariou & V. Kouskouna & G. Kaviris, 2016. "Modeling landslide susceptibility in Greece: a weighted linear combination approach using analytic hierarchical process, validated with spatial and statistical analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1873-1904, December.
    6. Santos Daniel Chicas & Heng Li & Nobuya Mizoue & Tetsuji Ota & Yan Du & Márk Somogyvári, 2024. "Landslide susceptibility mapping core-base factors and models’ performance variability: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(14), pages 12573-12593, November.
    7. Emmanouil Psomiadis & Andreas Papazachariou & Konstantinos X. Soulis & Despoina-Simoni Alexiou & Ioannis Charalampopoulos, 2020. "Landslide Mapping and Susceptibility Assessment Using Geospatial Analysis and Earth Observation Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Rajesh Khatakho & Dipendra Gautam & Komal Raj Aryal & Vishnu Prasad Pandey & Rajesh Rupakhety & Suraj Lamichhane & Yi-Chung Liu & Khameis Abdouli & Rocky Talchabhadel & Bhesh Raj Thapa & Rabindra Adhi, 2021. "Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Gökhan Demir, 2018. "Landslide susceptibility mapping by using statistical analysis in the North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) on the northern part of Suşehri Town, Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(1), pages 133-154, May.
    10. Kamila Hodasová & Martin Bednarik, 2021. "Effect of using various weighting methods in a process of landslide susceptibility assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 481-499, January.
    11. Erica Akemi Goto & Keith Clarke, 2021. "Using expert knowledge to map the level of risk of shallow landslides in Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1701-1729, September.
    12. Danang Sri Hadmoko & Franck Lavigne & Guruh Samodra, 2017. "Application of a semiquantitative and GIS-based statistical model to landslide susceptibility zonation in Kayangan Catchment, Java, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 437-468, May.
    13. Maria Karpouza & Konstantinos Chousianitis & George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou & George Kaviris & Assimina Antonarakou, 2021. "Hazard zonation mapping of earthquake-induced secondary effects using spatial multi-criteria analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 637-669, October.
    14. Hamid Reza Pourghasemi & Amiya Gayen & Sungjae Park & Chang-Wook Lee & Saro Lee, 2018. "Assessment of Landslide-Prone Areas and Their Zonation Using Logistic Regression, LogitBoost, and NaïveBayes Machine-Learning Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Anik Saha & Sunil Saha, 2021. "Application of statistical probabilistic methods in landslide susceptibility assessment in Kurseong and its surrounding area of Darjeeling Himalayan, India: RS-GIS approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4453-4483, March.
    16. Chen Cao & Peihua Xu & Yihong Wang & Jianping Chen & Lianjing Zheng & Cencen Niu, 2016. "Flash Flood Hazard Susceptibility Mapping Using Frequency Ratio and Statistical Index Methods in Coalmine Subsidence Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Cahio Guimarães Seabra Eiras & Juliana Ribeiro Gonçalves de Souza & Renata Delicio Andrade de Freitas & César Falcão Barella & Tiago Martins Pereira, 2021. "Discriminant analysis as an efficient method for landslide susceptibility assessment in cities with the scarcity of predisposition data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1427-1442, June.
    18. Dimitrios Myronidis & Charalambos Papageorgiou & Stavros Theophanous, 2016. "Landslide susceptibility mapping based on landslide history and analytic hierarchy process (AHP)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 245-263, March.
    19. Shengwu Qin & Shuangshuang Qiao & Jingyu Yao & Lingshuai Zhang & Xiaowei Liu & Xu Guo & Yang Chen & Jingbo Sun, 2022. "Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2709-2738, December.
    20. Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Dhiren Kumar Behera, 2021. "Evaluation of the best smartphone model in the market by integrating fuzzy-AHP and PROMETHEE decision-making approach," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 48(1), pages 71-96, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:108:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04718-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.