IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v9y2007i1d10.1007_s11009-006-9008-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Hierarchical Space–time Modeling of Earthquake Data

Author

Listed:
  • Bent Natvig

    (University of Oslo)

  • Ingunn Fride Tvete

    (University of Oslo)

Abstract

Stochastic earthquake models are often based on a marked point process approach as for instance presented in Vere-Jones (Int. J. Forecast., 11:503–538, 1995). This gives a fine resolution both in space and time making it possible to represent each earthquake. However, it is not obvious that this approach is advantageous when aiming at earthquake predictions. In the present paper we take a coarse point of view considering grid cells of 0.5 × 0.5°, or about 50 × 50 km, and time periods of 4 months, which seems suitable for predictions. More specifically, we will discuss different alternatives of a Bayesian hierarchical space–time model in the spirit of Wikle et al. (Environ. Ecol. Stat., 5:117–154, 1998). For each time period the observations are the magnitudes of the largest observed earthquake within each grid cell. As data we apply parts of an earthquake catalogue provided by The Northern California Earthquake Data Center where we limit ourselves to the area 32–37° N, 115–120° W for the time period January 1981 through December 1999 containing the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes of magnitudes, respectively, 7.3 and 7.1 on the Richter scale. Based on space-time model alternatives one step earthquake predictions for the time periods containing these two events for all grid cells are arrived at. The model alternatives are implemented within an MCMC framework in Matlab. The model alternative that gives the overall best predictions based on a standard loss is claimed to give new knowledge on the spatial and time related dependencies between earthquakes. Also considering a specially designed loss using spatially averages of the 90th percentiles of the predicted values distribution of each cell it is clear that the best model predicts the high risk areas rather well. By using these percentiles we believe that one has a valuable tool for defining high and low risk areas in a region in short term predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bent Natvig & Ingunn Fride Tvete, 2007. "Bayesian Hierarchical Space–time Modeling of Earthquake Data," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 89-114, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:9:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-006-9008-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-006-9008-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-006-9008-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-006-9008-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yosihiko Ogata & Koichi Katsura & Masaharu Tanemura, 2003. "Modelling heterogeneous space–time occurrences of earthquakes and its residual analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 499-509, October.
    2. Vere-Jones, David, 1995. "Forecasting earthquakes and earthquake risk," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 503-538, December.
    3. Schoenberg F.P., 2003. "Multidimensional Residual Analysis of Point Process Models for Earthquake Occurrences," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 789-795, January.
    4. Wikle C. K. & Milliff R. F. & Nychka D. & Berliner L.M., 2001. "Spatiotemporal Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Tropical Ocean Surface Winds," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 382-397, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    2. Wilson J. Wright & Peter N. Neitlich & Alyssa E. Shiel & Mevin B. Hooten, 2022. "Mechanistic spatial models for heavy metal pollution," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:08:i16 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Amanda S. Hering & Karen Kazor & William Kleiber, 2015. "A Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressive Stochastic Wind Generator for Multiple Spatial and Temporal Scales," Resources, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Schneider, Michael & Lillo, Fabrizio & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2016. "How has sovereign bond market liquidity changed? An illiquidity spillover analysis," SAFE Working Paper Series 151, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    6. Samuel N. Cohen & Robert J. Elliott, 2013. "Filters and smoothers for self-exciting Markov modulated counting processes," Papers 1311.6257, arXiv.org.
    7. Zhang, Weitao & Arhonditsis, George B., 2009. "A Bayesian hierarchical framework for calibrating aquatic biogeochemical models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(18), pages 2142-2161.
    8. Christopher Wikle & Mevin Hooten, 2010. "A general science-based framework for dynamical spatio-temporal models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 417-451, November.
    9. Haruko M. Wainwright & Rusen Oktem & Baptiste Dafflon & Sigrid Dengel & John B. Curtis & Margaret S. Torn & Jessica Cherry & Susan S. Hubbard, 2021. "High-Resolution Spatio-Temporal Estimation of Net Ecosystem Exchange in Ice-Wedge Polygon Tundra Using In Situ Sensors and Remote Sensing Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. William A. Link & J. Andrew Royle & Jeff S. Hatfield, 2003. "Demographic Analysis from Summaries of an Age-Structured Population," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 778-785, December.
    11. Ericsson, Neil R., 2017. "How biased are U.S. government forecasts of the federal debt?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 543-559.
    12. Yuan Yan & Hsin-Cheng Huang & Marc G. Genton, 2021. "Vector Autoregressive Models with Spatially Structured Coefficients for Time Series on a Spatial Grid," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 387-408, September.
    13. Giada Adelfio & Yosihiko Ogata, 2010. "Hybrid kernel estimates of space–time earthquake occurrence rates using the epidemic-type aftershock sequence model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 62(1), pages 127-143, February.
    14. Jieying Jiao & Guanyu Hu & Jun Yan, 2021. "Heterogeneity pursuit for spatial point pattern with application to tree locations: A Bayesian semiparametric recourse," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), November.
    15. Frederic Paik Schoenberg & Marc Hoffmann & Ryan J. Harrigan, 2019. "A recursive point process model for infectious diseases," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1271-1287, October.
    16. Renata Rotondi & Elisa Varini, 2003. "Bayesian analysis of a marked point process: Application in seismic hazard assessment," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 12(1), pages 79-92, February.
    17. A. Baddeley & J. Møller & A. Pakes, 2008. "Properties of residuals for spatial point processes," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 60(3), pages 627-649, September.
    18. Margaret C Johnson & Brian J Reich & Josh M Gray, 2021. "Multisensor fusion of remotely sensed vegetation indices using space‐time dynamic linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 793-812, June.
    19. Joshua S. North & Christopher K. Wikle & Erin M. Schliep, 2022. "A Bayesian Approach for Data-Driven Dynamic Equation Discovery," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 728-747, December.
    20. Tsai, Chung-Hung & Chen, Cheng-Wu, 2011. "The establishment of a rapid natural disaster risk assessment model for the tourism industry," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 158-171.
    21. Kim, Yongku & Berliner, L. Mark, 2016. "Change of spatiotemporal scale in dynamic models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 80-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:9:y:2007:i:1:d:10.1007_s11009-006-9008-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.