IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v33y2022i8ne2760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanistic spatial models for heavy metal pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson J. Wright
  • Peter N. Neitlich
  • Alyssa E. Shiel
  • Mevin B. Hooten

Abstract

Mining operations can contribute substantial amounts of pollution in the form of atmospheric dust. Statistical models predicting the spread of pollutants from these sources are useful for evaluating the environmental impacts of mines. Our study develops a mechanistic spatial model for heavy metal concentrations in Cape Krusenstern National Monument (CAKR), Alaska, USA. We characterize the spatial structure in our statistical model using a spatio‐temporal process for atmospheric dispersion. Mathematically, this is modeled using an advection‐diffusion partial differential equation that incorporates information about pollutant sources, diffusion, duration of spread, and advection (i.e., prevailing winds). Our approach improves upon previous statistical methods by including a temporally varying advection component and linking indirect concentration measurements to the spatio‐temporal dynamics in the model. We estimated concentrations of three heavy metals jointly using a Bayesian hierarchical model to account for the similarity in processes across chemicals. Our mechanistic statistical model is beneficial because it can predict chemical concentrations for scenarios where mining activities change. Additionally, our analysis provides an example of how using spatio‐temporal processes in statistical models for spatial data can incorporate understanding of mechanisms governing the spread of pollution and provide inferences for parameters associated with these processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson J. Wright & Peter N. Neitlich & Alyssa E. Shiel & Mevin B. Hooten, 2022. "Mechanistic spatial models for heavy metal pollution," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:8:n:e2760
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eddelbuettel, Dirk & Sanderson, Conrad, 2014. "RcppArmadillo: Accelerating R with high-performance C++ linear algebra," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1054-1063.
    2. Ephraim M. Hanks & Erin M. Schliep & Mevin B. Hooten & Jennifer A. Hoeting, 2015. "Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 243-254, June.
    3. Eddelbuettel, Dirk & Francois, Romain, 2011. "Rcpp: Seamless R and C++ Integration," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 40(i08).
    4. Nathan B. Wikle & Ephraim M. Hanks & Lucas R. F. Henneman & Corwin M. Zigler, 2022. "A Mechanistic Model of Annual Sulfate Concentrations in the United States," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(539), pages 1082-1093, September.
    5. Christopher Wikle & Mevin Hooten, 2010. "A general science-based framework for dynamical spatio-temporal models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 417-451, November.
    6. Hodges, James S. & Reich, Brian J., 2010. "Adding Spatially-Correlated Errors Can Mess Up the Fixed Effect You Love," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(4), pages 325-334.
    7. Christopher Wikle & Mevin Hooten, 2010. "Rejoinder on: A general science-based framework for dynamical spatio-temporal models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 466-468, November.
    8. Wikle C. K. & Milliff R. F. & Nychka D. & Berliner L.M., 2001. "Spatiotemporal Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Tropical Ocean Surface Winds," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 382-397, June.
    9. Ephraim M. Hanks, 2017. "Modeling Spatial Covariance Using the Limiting Distribution of Spatio-Temporal Random Walks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 497-507, April.
    10. Trevor J. Hefley & Mevin B. Hooten & Ephraim M. Hanks & Robin E. Russell & Daniel P. Walsh, 2017. "The Bayesian Group Lasso for Confounded Spatial Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 42-59, March.
    11. Xinyi Lu & Perry J. Williams & Mevin B. Hooten & James A. Powell & Jamie N. Womble & Michael R. Bower, 2020. "Nonlinear reaction–diffusion process models improve inference for population dynamics," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ephraim M. Hanks, 2017. "Modeling Spatial Covariance Using the Limiting Distribution of Spatio-Temporal Random Walks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 497-507, April.
    2. Douglas R. M. Azevedo & Marcos O. Prates & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2021. "MSPOCK: Alleviating Spatial Confounding in Multivariate Disease Mapping Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 464-491, September.
    3. Philip A. White & Durban G. Keeler & Daniel Sheanshang & Summer Rupper, 2022. "Improving piecewise linear snow density models through hierarchical spatial and orthogonal functional smoothing," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    4. Isa Marques & Thomas Kneib & Nadja Klein, 2022. "Mitigating spatial confounding by explicitly correlating Gaussian random fields," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), August.
    5. Christopher K. Wikle, 2019. "Comparison of Deep Neural Networks and Deep Hierarchical Models for Spatio-Temporal Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 175-203, June.
    6. Emiko Dupont & Simon N. Wood & Nicole H. Augustin, 2022. "Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1279-1290, December.
    7. Helmut Lütkepohl & Fei Shang & Luis Uzeda & Tomasz Woźniak, 2024. "Partial Identification of Heteroskedastic Structural VARs: Theory and Bayesian Inference," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2081, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Matthew Bonas & Christopher K. Wikle & Stefano Castruccio, 2024. "Calibrated forecasts of quasi‐periodic climate processes with deep echo state networks and penalized quantile regression," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    9. Jennifer F. Bobb & Maricela F. Cruz & Stephen J. Mooney & Adam Drewnowski & David Arterburn & Andrea J. Cook, 2022. "Accounting for spatial confounding in epidemiological studies with individual‐level exposures: An exposure‐penalized spline approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 1271-1293, July.
    10. Battauz, Michela & Vidoni, Paolo, 2022. "A likelihood-based boosting algorithm for factor analysis models with binary data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Jos'e Vin'icius de Miranda Cardoso & Jiaxi Ying & Daniel Perez Palomar, 2020. "Algorithms for Learning Graphs in Financial Markets," Papers 2012.15410, arXiv.org.
    12. Candace Berrett & William F. Christensen & Stephan R. Sain & Nathan Sandholtz & David W. Coats & Claudia Tebaldi & Hedibert F. Lopes, 2020. "Modeling sea‐level processes on the U.S. Atlantic Coast," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), June.
    13. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Shen, Yunyi & Olson, Erik R. & Van Deelen, Timothy R., 2021. "Spatially explicit modeling of community occupancy using Markov Random Field models with imperfect observation: Mesocarnivores in Apostle Islands National Lakeshore," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).
    15. Matthew Pietrosanu & Jueyu Gao & Linglong Kong & Bei Jiang & Di Niu, 2021. "Advanced algorithms for penalized quantile and composite quantile regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 333-346, March.
    16. Lee, Xing Ju & Hainy, Markus & McKeone, James P. & Drovandi, Christopher C. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2018. "ABC model selection for spatial extremes models applied to South Australian maximum temperature data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 128-144.
    17. François Bachoc & Marc G Genton & Klaus Nordhausen & Anne Ruiz-Gazen & Joni Virta, 2020. "Spatial blind source separation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 107(3), pages 627-646.
    18. Bonneau, Mathieu & Johnson, Fred A. & Romagosa, Christina M., 2016. "Spatially explicit control of invasive species using a reaction–diffusion model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 15-24.
    19. João B. M. Pereira & Widemberg S. Nobre & Igor F. L. Silva & Alexandra M. Schmidt, 2020. "Spatial confounding in hurdle multilevel beta models: the case of the Brazilian Mathematical Olympics for Public Schools," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1051-1073, June.
    20. Walder, Adam & Hanks, Ephraim M., 2020. "Bayesian analysis of spatial generalized linear mixed models with Laplace moving average random fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:33:y:2022:i:8:n:e2760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.