IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v100y2024i2d10.1007_s00186-024-00872-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-stage distributionally robust convex stochastic optimization with Bayesian-type ambiguity sets

Author

Listed:
  • Wentao Ma

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University
    Xi’an International Academy for Mathematics and Mathematical Technology)

  • Zhiping Chen

    (Xi’an Jiaotong University
    Xi’an International Academy for Mathematics and Mathematical Technology)

Abstract

The existent methods for constructing ambiguity sets in distributionally robust optimization often suffer from over-conservativeness and inefficient utilization of available data. To address these limitations and to practically solve multi-stage distributionally robust optimization (MDRO), we propose a data-driven Bayesian-type approach that constructs the ambiguity set of possible distributions from a Bayesian perspective. We demonstrate that our Bayesian-type MDRO problem can be reformulated as a risk-averse multi-stage stochastic programming problem and subsequently investigate its theoretical properties such as consistency, finite sample guarantee, and statistical robustness. Moreover, the reformulation enables us to employ cutting planes algorithms in dynamic settings to solve the Bayesian-type MDRO problem. To illustrate the practicality and advantages of the proposed model and algorithm, we apply it to a distributionally robust inventory control problem and a distributionally robust hydrothermal scheduling problem, and compare it with usual formulations and solution methods to highlight the superior performance of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Wentao Ma & Zhiping Chen, 2024. "Multi-stage distributionally robust convex stochastic optimization with Bayesian-type ambiguity sets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 100(2), pages 553-600, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:100:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00186-024-00872-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00186-024-00872-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00186-024-00872-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00186-024-00872-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Rebennack, 2022. "Data-driven stochastic optimization for distributional ambiguity with integrated confidence region," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 255-293, October.
    2. Angelos Georghiou & Angelos Tsoukalas & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "Robust Dual Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 813-830, May.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Shimrit Shtern & Bradley Sturt, 2023. "A Data-Driven Approach to Multistage Stochastic Linear Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 51-74, January.
    4. Vishal Gupta, 2019. "Near-Optimal Bayesian Ambiguity Sets for Distributionally Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4242-4260, September.
    5. Erick Delage & Shie Mannor, 2010. "Percentile Optimization for Markov Decision Processes with Parameter Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 203-213, February.
    6. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    7. Vitor L. de Matos & David P. Morton & Erlon C. Finardi, 2017. "Assessing policy quality in a multistage stochastic program for long-term hydrothermal scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(2), pages 713-731, June.
    8. Shapiro, Alexander, 2011. "Analysis of stochastic dual dynamic programming method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 63-72, February.
    9. Bart P. G. Van Parys & Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani & Daniel Kuhn, 2021. "From Data to Decisions: Distributionally Robust Optimization Is Optimal," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3387-3402, June.
    10. Suvrajeet Sen & Lihua Yu & Talat Genc, 2006. "A Stochastic Programming Approach to Power Portfolio Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 55-72, February.
    11. Xin, Linwei & Goldberg, David A., 2021. "Time (in)consistency of multistage distributionally robust inventory models with moment constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 1127-1141.
    12. Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2016. "Strong Formulations for Multistage Stochastic Self-Scheduling Unit Commitment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1482-1498, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Park, Jangho & Bayraksan, Güzin, 2023. "A multistage distributionally robust optimization approach to water allocation under climate uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 849-871.
    2. Zhiping Chen & Wentao Ma, 2024. "A Bayesian approach to data-driven multi-stage stochastic optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 401-428, October.
    3. Li Xia, 2020. "Risk‐Sensitive Markov Decision Processes with Combined Metrics of Mean and Variance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2808-2827, December.
    4. Raimund M. Kovacevic, 2019. "Valuation and pricing of electricity delivery contracts: the producer’s view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 421-460, April.
    5. Davi Valladão & Thuener Silva & Marcus Poggi, 2019. "Time-consistent risk-constrained dynamic portfolio optimization with transactional costs and time-dependent returns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 379-405, November.
    6. Rudloff, Birgit & Street, Alexandre & Valladão, Davi M., 2014. "Time consistency and risk averse dynamic decision models: Definition, interpretation and practical consequences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 743-750.
    7. A. B. Philpott & V. L. Matos & L. Kapelevich, 2018. "Distributionally robust SDDP," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 431-454, October.
    8. Kettunen, Janne & Bunn, Derek W., 2016. "Risk induced resource dependency in capacity investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 914-924.
    9. Murwan Siddig & Yongjia Song, 2022. "Adaptive partition-based SDDP algorithms for multistage stochastic linear programming with fixed recourse," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 201-250, January.
    10. Schur, Rouven & Gönsch, Jochen & Hassler, Michael, 2019. "Time-consistent, risk-averse dynamic pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 587-603.
    11. Kim, Seokwoo & Choi, Dong Gu, 2024. "A sample robust optimal bidding model for a virtual power plant," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1101-1113.
    12. Oscar Dowson & Lea Kapelevich, 2021. "SDDP.jl : A Julia Package for Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 27-33, January.
    13. Guigues, Vincent & Sagastizábal, Claudia, 2012. "The value of rolling-horizon policies for risk-averse hydro-thermal planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 129-140.
    14. Philpott, A.B. & de Matos, V.L., 2012. "Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 470-483.
    15. Roy H. Kwon & J. Scott Rogers & Sheena Yau, 2006. "Stochastic programming models for replication of electricity forward contracts for industry," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(7), pages 713-726, October.
    16. W. Ackooij & X. Warin, 2020. "On conditional cuts for stochastic dual dynamic programming," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(2), pages 173-199, June.
    17. Liu, Rui Peng & Shapiro, Alexander, 2020. "Risk neutral reformulation approach to risk averse stochastic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 21-31.
    18. Yıldıran, Uğur, 2023. "Robust multi-stage economic dispatch with renewable generation and storage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 890-909.
    19. Mahmutoğulları, Ali İrfan & Çavuş, Özlem & Aktürk, M. Selim, 2018. "Bounds on risk-averse mixed-integer multi-stage stochastic programming problems with mean-CVaR," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 595-608.
    20. Andy Philpott & Vitor de Matos & Erlon Finardi, 2013. "On Solving Multistage Stochastic Programs with Coherent Risk Measures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 957-970, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:100:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s00186-024-00872-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.